Author Topic: Sprint Videos  (Read 58444 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mikey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • Respect: +2787
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/Mutumbo000?feature=mhee
    • Email
"IMO, It didn't happen if it's not on vid/official"- adarqui

It's easier to keep up than it is to catch up...

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #61 on: October 25, 2016, 01:52:49 pm »
+2
360 view of the 100m and 400m finals

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6zxRAAtTf4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6zxRAAtTf4</a>

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #62 on: November 05, 2016, 01:38:16 pm »
+2
mo farah 100m

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJMIwlQB-28" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJMIwlQB-28</a>

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #63 on: January 01, 2017, 02:36:56 am »
+2
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9riEiVRuDRs" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9riEiVRuDRs</a>

Mikey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • Respect: +2787
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/Mutumbo000?feature=mhee
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #64 on: February 22, 2017, 07:40:29 am »
+1
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQZTVD4Y9r4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQZTVD4Y9r4</a>

Good video but very interesting commentary. The commentator mentioned that the first time Andre De Grasse ran he ran 10.9 seconds with sneakers on. His wikipedia page says the same thing "De Grasse started racing in grade eleven. Wearing basketball shorts and Converse shoes and using no starting blocks, he secured second position in his first 100 m race with a time of 10.9 seconds.[6] He was spotted by future coach Tony Sharpe who noticed his potential because of this". It also said his mother was a sprinter.

http://speedacademy.ca/index.php/in-the-news/74-usc-sprinter-andre-de-grasse-makes-huge-strides-on-and-off-track

« Last Edit: February 22, 2017, 07:44:58 am by Mutumbo000 »
"IMO, It didn't happen if it's not on vid/official"- adarqui

It's easier to keep up than it is to catch up...

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #65 on: August 19, 2017, 01:17:03 am »
0
probably been posted before

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEIxpcYukqc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEIxpcYukqc</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b_KrJf9uic" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b_KrJf9uic</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLWejYWjANM" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLWejYWjANM</a>

seifullaah73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3933
  • Respect: +1741
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #66 on: August 24, 2017, 02:59:46 pm »
+1
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VX2gbN8pik" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VX2gbN8pik</a>
Warm up drills
   - a walk, b skip quick powerful switch (heel to hams focus), a runs, dribbles small to big to run, straight leg to runs (force, reflex, go up/forward). force to hit the ground before it hits the ground knee/hip is at 90 degrees.
   - acceleration: low heel recovery, shin angle low, drive legs back before hitting the ground and drive thighs/knee forward not up
-------------------------------------------------------------
Measuring reminder:
5 toe to heel steps = 148cm
------------------------------------------------------------------------

�Strength comes from the legs, Power comes from the torso and Speed comes from the arm.� � Al Vermeil
Arm also aids the legs in driving it down with power - seifullaah73

My Progress Log
A Journey to Running fast and Jumping High
http://www.adarq.org/progress-journals-experimental-routines/my-journey-to-hypertrophy/

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #67 on: August 24, 2017, 03:41:37 pm »
+1
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VX2gbN8pik" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VX2gbN8pik</a>

2.77 m per stride at 4.49 strides per second at Max V.

:o

that must feel amazing. nice vid.

seifullaah73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3933
  • Respect: +1741
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #68 on: August 31, 2017, 10:30:16 am »
+1
I'm soo jealous of his training. Makes me want to add some lol but will not.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sDMQyqNZi4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sDMQyqNZi4</a>
« Last Edit: August 31, 2017, 10:32:22 am by seifullaah73 »
Warm up drills
   - a walk, b skip quick powerful switch (heel to hams focus), a runs, dribbles small to big to run, straight leg to runs (force, reflex, go up/forward). force to hit the ground before it hits the ground knee/hip is at 90 degrees.
   - acceleration: low heel recovery, shin angle low, drive legs back before hitting the ground and drive thighs/knee forward not up
-------------------------------------------------------------
Measuring reminder:
5 toe to heel steps = 148cm
------------------------------------------------------------------------

�Strength comes from the legs, Power comes from the torso and Speed comes from the arm.� � Al Vermeil
Arm also aids the legs in driving it down with power - seifullaah73

My Progress Log
A Journey to Running fast and Jumping High
http://www.adarq.org/progress-journals-experimental-routines/my-journey-to-hypertrophy/

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #69 on: August 31, 2017, 04:12:12 pm »
+1
I'm soo jealous of his training. Makes me want to add some lol but will not.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sDMQyqNZi4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sDMQyqNZi4</a>

really nice vid, but, the intro has me suspect. so he does all of that stuff, then it comes down to SMFR? Instead, maybe he did too much "nonsense"? Maybe doing lots of that stuff with the de-oxygenation mask was completely useless?

I was actually going to create a thread a few weeks ago titled "There are too many damn exercises".

I've gone from a small set of exercise, to lots of different exercises, to a small set of exercises, to a very small set of exercises. Most people want to do cool fun things, or fun looking things, hard fun things, hard weird things .. how much of this is actually needed & how do you gauge the effectiveness of something when you have so much variety?

no idea of Blake's actual training & how it was composed, but it seems like we've been in a phase where monotony is no longer tolerated. We're also in a phase where "different stuff" gets more attention, more likes, more views, more respect etc: it's alot easier to do that with videos like you posted above.

I think the biggest "turning point" for me, was watching the *infestation* of "s&c coaches" in fight sports. That's what really started to really make me cringe. I watched it in person at ATT (American Top Team), I watched it on tv/online such as Brandon Rios doing a bunch of fancy lameness.. Instead of spending that time actually working on a counter, throwing more punches, working skill etc, these s&c coaches got fighters doing lame footwork drills on an agility latter then doing a few hops. IMHO, completely useless.. That kind of coaching permeates everything now.

When I did my second internship at Memorial Fitness/Rehab, there was this functional trainer there. Guy was "brilliant", knew his shit. Knew how everything fit together, anatomically/kinesiology/biomechanically. He was so impressive to most people. He's a good dude, but, the training I saw him provide athletes/elderly/out of shape people was just pure BS. He knew too much for his own good & carved out a niche, offering up sub-par training to individuals of all fitness/athletic levels.

I guess i'm just annoyed with the exercise variety out there. I'm subscribed to a few S&C IG's and every other day they are doing a new exercise, promoting some new ground breaking ISOMETRIC PAP lameness.

It's just interesting how some people approach training so scientifically, and can't coach/improve someone for shit. It's science right? All we have to do is <insert program here> because it worked before, and tweak a few variables. I think "the art" mixed with "some science" is far more effective. An example of "the art" is what I mentioned above, some seasoned boxing coach / track coach knowing pretty much what to do to get their athlete at their peak & address weaknesses for a specific event, who rely less on science & more on experience, instead of letting some S&C coach come in and try to act like a "human mechanic" and just screw everything up.

A really good example of that also, is "RJ" from way back. Dude was science to the max, seemed to ignore alot of people who had more "experience" (on elite track/charlie francis forum, db hammer forum etc) which contradicted things he'd learned in supertraining & evosport etc. Not to talk shit on him, but that's just potentially a good example. Not sure what happened to him, would be nuts if he's an olympic hopeful now or something, that'd be pure wreckage for me. lmfao. Searched him and found his book: http://xlathlete.com/xl/events/engineering-an-athlete.pdf .. it was awesome that he wrote a book but come on.. It's probably an amazing read, would probably derail my training completely and have me doing all kinds of crazy isometric awesomeness. On the other hand, it's probably poisonous. Stuff like that, without the proper experience, can fuck your brain up. However, if you believe in a training ideology so much, that's a very important thing. So believing in your training, no matter how mediocre or useless, is absolutely essential & can still improve performance. That belief coupled with brutal effort, can unlock things even if the training makes no sense - as long as you're still getting in enough of the event you're training for. If some extraordinary belief in sub-par training can unlock more confidence mentally & drive physically, that can definitely improve race/competition efforts & such. S&C is weird.

dno.. been thinking about stuff like that for a while now.

end tangent/rant. :D

seifullaah73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3933
  • Respect: +1741
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #70 on: August 31, 2017, 04:58:45 pm »
+1
I'm soo jealous of his training. Makes me want to add some lol but will not.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sDMQyqNZi4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sDMQyqNZi4</a>

really nice vid, but, the intro has me suspect. so he does all of that stuff, then it comes down to SMFR? Instead, maybe he did too much "nonsense"? Maybe doing lots of that stuff with the de-oxygenation mask was completely useless?

I was actually going to create a thread a few weeks ago titled "There are too many damn exercises".

I've gone from a small set of exercise, to lots of different exercises, to a small set of exercises, to a very small set of exercises. Most people want to do cool fun things, or fun looking things, hard fun things, hard weird things .. how much of this is actually needed & how do you gauge the effectiveness of something when you have so much variety?

no idea of Blake's actual training & how it was composed, but it seems like we've been in a phase where monotony is no longer tolerated. We're also in a phase where "different stuff" gets more attention, more likes, more views, more respect etc: it's alot easier to do that with videos like you posted above.

I think the biggest "turning point" for me, was watching the *infestation* of "s&c coaches" in fight sports. That's what really started to really make me cringe. I watched it in person at ATT (American Top Team), I watched it on tv/online such as Brandon Rios doing a bunch of fancy lameness.. Instead of spending that time actually working on a counter, throwing more punches, working skill etc, these s&c coaches got fighters doing lame footwork drills on an agility latter then doing a few hops. IMHO, completely useless.. That kind of coaching permeates everything now.

When I did my second internship at Memorial Fitness/Rehab, there was this functional trainer there. Guy was "brilliant", knew his shit. Knew how everything fit together, anatomically/kinesiology/biomechanically. He was so impressive to most people. He's a good dude, but, the training I saw him provide athletes/elderly/out of shape people was just pure BS. He knew too much for his own good & carved out a niche, offering up sub-par training to individuals of all fitness/athletic levels.

I guess i'm just annoyed with the exercise variety out there. I'm subscribed to a few S&C IG's and every other day they are doing a new exercise, promoting some new ground breaking ISOMETRIC PAP lameness.

It's just interesting how some people approach training so scientifically, and can't coach/improve someone for shit. It's science right? All we have to do is <insert program here> because it worked before, and tweak a few variables. I think "the art" mixed with "some science" is far more effective. An example of "the art" is what I mentioned above, some seasoned boxing coach / track coach knowing pretty much what to do to get their athlete at their peak & address weaknesses for a specific event, who rely less on science & more on experience, instead of letting some S&C coach come in and try to act like a "human mechanic" and just screw everything up.

A really good example of that also, is "RJ" from way back. Dude was science to the max, seemed to ignore alot of people who had more "experience" (on elite track/charlie francis forum, db hammer forum etc) which contradicted things he'd learned in supertraining & evosport etc. Not to talk shit on him, but that's just potentially a good example. Not sure what happened to him, would be nuts if he's an olympic hopeful now or something, that'd be pure wreckage for me. lmfao. Searched him and found his book: http://xlathlete.com/xl/events/engineering-an-athlete.pdf .. it was awesome that he wrote a book but come on.. It's probably an amazing read, would probably derail my training completely and have me doing all kinds of crazy isometric awesomeness. On the other hand, it's probably poisonous. Stuff like that, without the proper experience, can fuck your brain up. However, if you believe in a training ideology so much, that's a very important thing. So believing in your training, no matter how mediocre or useless, is absolutely essential & can still improve performance. That belief coupled with brutal effort, can unlock things even if the training makes no sense - as long as you're still getting in enough of the event you're training for. If some extraordinary belief in sub-par training can unlock more confidence mentally & drive physically, that can definitely improve race/competition efforts & such. S&C is weird.

dno.. been thinking about stuff like that for a while now.

end tangent/rant. :D

I didn't really listen to what the guy was saying and I don't think all that training is his entire training but it's bits of different training he did or does. I was seeing the different variety exercises he does, just damn.

Nice, thanks for that. I have also been thinking about this also. There are so many damn exercises that are available, some fancier than others and you can see where would get it from, but there is something about training that is a little more complex than just training that movement loaded like the thing blake does from kneeling to jumping up to squat position they look nice and everything, but they really confuse people who want to train and they see all these workouts and it just destroys them mentally with too much material me included thinking wow I do a little and they have all these varieties I am so far behind, but after reading what you wrote, this is all just unnecessary, complex is not better simplicity is.

I can't rant on any more don't have more knowledge to add lol. But good points.
Warm up drills
   - a walk, b skip quick powerful switch (heel to hams focus), a runs, dribbles small to big to run, straight leg to runs (force, reflex, go up/forward). force to hit the ground before it hits the ground knee/hip is at 90 degrees.
   - acceleration: low heel recovery, shin angle low, drive legs back before hitting the ground and drive thighs/knee forward not up
-------------------------------------------------------------
Measuring reminder:
5 toe to heel steps = 148cm
------------------------------------------------------------------------

�Strength comes from the legs, Power comes from the torso and Speed comes from the arm.� � Al Vermeil
Arm also aids the legs in driving it down with power - seifullaah73

My Progress Log
A Journey to Running fast and Jumping High
http://www.adarq.org/progress-journals-experimental-routines/my-journey-to-hypertrophy/

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #71 on: August 31, 2017, 10:57:26 pm »
+1
I'm soo jealous of his training. Makes me want to add some lol but will not.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sDMQyqNZi4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sDMQyqNZi4</a>

really nice vid, but, the intro has me suspect. so he does all of that stuff, then it comes down to SMFR? Instead, maybe he did too much "nonsense"? Maybe doing lots of that stuff with the de-oxygenation mask was completely useless?

I was actually going to create a thread a few weeks ago titled "There are too many damn exercises".

I've gone from a small set of exercise, to lots of different exercises, to a small set of exercises, to a very small set of exercises. Most people want to do cool fun things, or fun looking things, hard fun things, hard weird things .. how much of this is actually needed & how do you gauge the effectiveness of something when you have so much variety?

no idea of Blake's actual training & how it was composed, but it seems like we've been in a phase where monotony is no longer tolerated. We're also in a phase where "different stuff" gets more attention, more likes, more views, more respect etc: it's alot easier to do that with videos like you posted above.

I think the biggest "turning point" for me, was watching the *infestation* of "s&c coaches" in fight sports. That's what really started to really make me cringe. I watched it in person at ATT (American Top Team), I watched it on tv/online such as Brandon Rios doing a bunch of fancy lameness.. Instead of spending that time actually working on a counter, throwing more punches, working skill etc, these s&c coaches got fighters doing lame footwork drills on an agility latter then doing a few hops. IMHO, completely useless.. That kind of coaching permeates everything now.

When I did my second internship at Memorial Fitness/Rehab, there was this functional trainer there. Guy was "brilliant", knew his shit. Knew how everything fit together, anatomically/kinesiology/biomechanically. He was so impressive to most people. He's a good dude, but, the training I saw him provide athletes/elderly/out of shape people was just pure BS. He knew too much for his own good & carved out a niche, offering up sub-par training to individuals of all fitness/athletic levels.

I guess i'm just annoyed with the exercise variety out there. I'm subscribed to a few S&C IG's and every other day they are doing a new exercise, promoting some new ground breaking ISOMETRIC PAP lameness.

It's just interesting how some people approach training so scientifically, and can't coach/improve someone for shit. It's science right? All we have to do is <insert program here> because it worked before, and tweak a few variables. I think "the art" mixed with "some science" is far more effective. An example of "the art" is what I mentioned above, some seasoned boxing coach / track coach knowing pretty much what to do to get their athlete at their peak & address weaknesses for a specific event, who rely less on science & more on experience, instead of letting some S&C coach come in and try to act like a "human mechanic" and just screw everything up.

A really good example of that also, is "RJ" from way back. Dude was science to the max, seemed to ignore alot of people who had more "experience" (on elite track/charlie francis forum, db hammer forum etc) which contradicted things he'd learned in supertraining & evosport etc. Not to talk shit on him, but that's just potentially a good example. Not sure what happened to him, would be nuts if he's an olympic hopeful now or something, that'd be pure wreckage for me. lmfao. Searched him and found his book: http://xlathlete.com/xl/events/engineering-an-athlete.pdf .. it was awesome that he wrote a book but come on.. It's probably an amazing read, would probably derail my training completely and have me doing all kinds of crazy isometric awesomeness. On the other hand, it's probably poisonous. Stuff like that, without the proper experience, can fuck your brain up. However, if you believe in a training ideology so much, that's a very important thing. So believing in your training, no matter how mediocre or useless, is absolutely essential & can still improve performance. That belief coupled with brutal effort, can unlock things even if the training makes no sense - as long as you're still getting in enough of the event you're training for. If some extraordinary belief in sub-par training can unlock more confidence mentally & drive physically, that can definitely improve race/competition efforts & such. S&C is weird.

dno.. been thinking about stuff like that for a while now.

end tangent/rant. :D

I didn't really listen to what the guy was saying and I don't think all that training is his entire training but it's bits of different training he did or does. I was seeing the different variety exercises he does, just damn.

Nice, thanks for that. I have also been thinking about this also. There are so many damn exercises that are available, some fancier than others and you can see where would get it from, but there is something about training that is a little more complex than just training that movement loaded like the thing blake does from kneeling to jumping up to squat position they look nice and everything, but they really confuse people who want to train and they see all these workouts and it just destroys them mentally with too much material me included thinking wow I do a little and they have all these varieties I am so far behind, but after reading what you wrote, this is all just unnecessary, complex is not better simplicity is.

I can't rant on any more don't have more knowledge to add lol. But good points.

hah np. you basically triggered me. I could just picture you sitting there feeling briefly like your training is inadequate & you don't have access to some fancy stuff, but in reality, most of the stuff in that video is not needed & alot of it probably isn't too effective.

just think about the "beast" thread, what do we put in there? mostly raw lifts with impressive relative strength ratios.. so as far as lifting goes, i'd go with the basics & push those to the max rather than play around with all of the fancy stuff.

for you, the track is your #1 tool, weight room #2 .. and in the weight room, basics #1 :D

basics #1 regardless.. lmfao.

most people that push fancy stuff are also pushing themselves.. like mr Glute Guy and his barbell hip thrusts, best example I can think of. Contreras is cool, seems like a good dude, but he thought he found the magic potion & he pushed it to the limit. It's probably more effective than not, but probably far less effective than pushing up your squat.. Also now he's kind of admitted he fell victim to being creative. just an example.

pc!

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #72 on: September 02, 2017, 09:14:32 am »
+1
Great Usain Bolt footage from Mo Farah!!

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyWmxUMf50E" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyWmxUMf50E</a>

sick vid.

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #73 on: September 04, 2017, 01:17:58 am »
+1
this popped up in my yt feed, seems decent. also I like what he said about going 98% not 100% and keeping 100% (golden gear) for meets.. so seems more credible with that info :F

I kinda of do this technique naturally .. same for his 400m advice. Just seems like the natural way to run a 200m or 400m.. i'm sure there are several other strategies people employ, so will be fun messing with all of this on occasion.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_8cmScRf8I" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_8cmScRf8I</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9YemFMrI6c" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9YemFMrI6c</a>



his gf has a nice body @ 6:20 .. geet.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78Ve6Df66eE" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78Ve6Df66eE</a>


adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9110
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Sprint Videos
« Reply #74 on: October 20, 2017, 10:29:19 am »
+1
sick

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3G1pHEjgUt4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3G1pHEjgUt4</a>