Adarq.org

Performance Area => Article & Video Discussion => Topic started by: Joel Smith on July 27, 2012, 03:03:07 pm

Title: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Joel Smith on July 27, 2012, 03:03:07 pm
Hey everyone,

I just finished a great article on the science of Kettlebell swings which you can find below

http://www.just-fly-sports.com/1/post/2012/07/eccentric-overloading-methods-for-jumpers-kettlebell-swings-part-i.html#.UBK9vrRQ6Ag (http://www.just-fly-sports.com/1/post/2012/07/eccentric-overloading-methods-for-jumpers-kettlebell-swings-part-i.html#.UBK9vrRQ6Ag)

With studies out there that have shown kettlebell snatches to be 3x as effective as plyometrics and anecdotal experiences of 3" vertical gains in 45 minutes, this is a great topic and a great read.

I would love to hear your comments, questions or experiences with this type of work.  It has added a great new element to my own training this summer.

Joel
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Raptor on July 27, 2012, 04:10:29 pm
Excellent article, as usual.

The swing does so many things... it's probably one of the top exercises ever in terms of how many things it does at the same time.

My question would be - how to choose the "best" weight for your kettlebell. Is it a matter of "choose the heaviest KB that allows you to perform the movement correctly" or is it something more than that?

What if I can do them correctly for 5 reps with a 40 kg kettlebell and 20 reps with a 24 kg kettlebell? What if I can use more speed with the 24? And so on.

These are important questions but I think they aren't "essential" to be answered. The fact of the matter is that whether you choose a very heavy or a lighter kettlebell you'll still get a heck of a workout for your hips.

It also helps for hip flexor flexibility in my opinion, since you're basically doing a ton of hip hyperextensions at a pretty high speed so you're basically doing hip flexor dynamic stretching. Helpful if you're in anterior pelvic tilt.

As a side note, I personally found out that keeping the chin tucked down a bit helps you hip hyperextend better in the swings.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Joel Smith on July 27, 2012, 04:14:08 pm
Raptor,

I'll cover the weight and technique a bit more in part II>  As for the weight, Brandon Hetzler who does the force plate research recommends 1/3 of bodyweight for maximal results.  Heavier than that and you are losing velocity.  For snatches the weight has to be very light.... I am tempted to start experimenting with the swing using wrist wraps... seems like it would be a lot better in terms of preventing loss of energy transfer to the hips. 

Joel
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Raptor on July 27, 2012, 04:23:06 pm
Yeah I know you said there will be part two, but I had to remind you of that chin down stuff in this comment :P

Interesting... 1/3 huh? Well 1/3 of my bodyweight would be 27 kg (so a 28 kg kettlebell) and I have a 24 kg KB but 1/3 really sounds like an arbitrary number that doesn't take into account the athlete's strength...

Don't tell me the same 1/3 recommendation is the same for a guy with a 1x squat and for a guy with a 3x squat as well.

That's like saying "you should snatch with 0.4x bodyweight". Um... no, not really. You should snatch at your individual strength level and with a weight that gives you the best training effect in regards to YOUR strenght level.

So I'm not really ready to buy the 1/3 recommendation.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Joel Smith on July 27, 2012, 04:30:58 pm
Raptor,

Without trying to put words in Brandon's mouth, I feel that the 1/3 recommendation is due to the swing almost being more of a plyometric/low inertia training modality, rather than a "lift".  Obviously an athlete who is incredibly strong can use more weight, but the book "easy strength" where I found a lot of my original material talks about many athletes who have found great results without heavy bells.  Donnie Thompson, who has the WR in powerlifting in the superheavy and squats well over 1,000lbs "only" uses a 100lb bell for his training.... which is just under 1/3 of his bodyweight I believe. 

Obviously the 1/3 bodyweight bell is a general recommendation, but I would imagine for the majority of trained athletes who squat around 1.5-2.0x bodyweight and SVJ 25-35" it is a solid solution.  Not to mention, even if you are incredibly strong, the swing is all about speed!  Even if you squat 3x bw, you can't turn that strength on quickly enough to reverse the bell faster than someone who squat 2.5x or 2.0x bodyweight.... providing it is a light bell.

An anecdote was given in the book about a guy who was 5'9 and had a 2.5x bw squat... maybe more, who went from grabbing rim to dunking by using a 50lb bell I believe?  The weight doesn't have to be high... of course, stronger people can use a bit more weight... maybe 1/2 maximum I would say, while weaker athletes would probably want to go more around 1/4... but I think the 1/3 range is where most athletes can benefit the most. 

Finally, that weight... 1/3 was the "sweet spot" where most athletes could produce the highest force on the force plate. 

Joel
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Raptor on July 27, 2012, 04:37:00 pm
Have you tried walking swings? Like, LR or RL "plant" swings where you take a step forward with say your left leg, swing the bell and as your bell reaches the top of the movement you take your other step (with your right leg in this case).

I think it's the most specific swing exercise for a LR plant in a jump for example. You can also do variations on this (like swinging the bell without taking any steps and while the bell reaches the top you do both steps while there (it will be less tension on your legs though)).

I learned about these variations in the Encyclopedia of Kettlebell lifting by Steve Cotter.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Raptor on July 27, 2012, 05:01:31 pm
By the way - what do you think about replacing badly executed power cleans (I do them using the back instead of the hips - I feel a lot of "lowerback pull" when doing them) with KB swings which are much easier to execute correctly?
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Joel Smith on July 30, 2012, 09:35:27 am
Raptor,

The walking things seem like an interesting concept, I'll try them out and get back to you on that. 

I think that KB swings are the ultimate solution for olympic lifting in athletes with contraindications.  If athlete struggle with the Oly lifts, or have an injury that make them difficult to perform, go for KB swings!  KB snatches are great too! 

In Verkhoshansky's programs, particularly those in his special strength manual for coaches, there are three main exercises in his vertical jump programs: Squats, Depth Jumps and Kettlebell Jumps (not swings... but rather jumps with the feet on two blocks and a kettlebell held below, jumping reps).  Anyhow, I can imagine that a simple program of squats, depth jumps and swings would be equally if not more awesome.

Joel
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: pelham32 on July 30, 2012, 10:13:17 am
I've used these before in Christian thibadaues 6 weeks to superhero program. I used around a 75 lb kettlebell plus banded (got that idea from Joe Defranco) I have to say the banded kb swing was my favorite exercise through out the whole program. I also noticed my running jumps were higher and it made my jumping smoother or look more effortlessly so to speak. I agree that the kb swing teaches heavy eccentric loading and having to turning and turn off tension. I would want to start incorporating these again, but what would a good set and rep scheme be like for banded swings?
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Raptor on July 30, 2012, 03:21:38 pm
I hate banded swings because so many people do them wrong... it teaches them to use so much more arm strength because the tension increases towards the top and the hip snap has already happened somewhere at the bottom so they try to use the shoulders/shrug etc using the arms more.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Nightfly on July 30, 2012, 04:59:42 pm
Great article. I like kb swings a lot. I think i'm gonna buy myself one soon.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Joel Smith on August 02, 2012, 12:02:16 am
Best rep range for the banded swings would be under 10 reps.  They are shown being done horrendously incorrectly on many pages.  You can do them well, but you need to really work hard on "hike passing" the bell between your legs.  You should feel the bell tickle your ball hairs, it needs to be that close!  Well, not really, but I thought it was a funny analogy.  Many people make the mistake of taking the bell between their knees on the swings, but this f@#ks the exercise all up.

I'll have part II up soon where I talk about how to do the swing with more material on incorporating it in a workout program... but simply.. you can do swings every day, they aren't all that taxing... just awesome!

Vlad, let me know how the KB training helps you in your upcoming dunk contests!

Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Raptor on August 02, 2012, 03:55:28 am
I know^^^

I completely agree.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: pelham32 on August 06, 2012, 11:09:33 pm
For those who don't have access to kettlebells, Ross Enamait on Ross training has a good video tutorial of how to make a homemade kettlebell he uses for swings. Hes on video swinging I think up to 175 lbs....  Great article Joel, I just reread it. Part 2 coming soon?
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Joel Smith on August 08, 2012, 09:13:01 am
I need to check out that home-made kettlebell article.  The second part of the article is up!

http://www.just-fly-sports.com/1/post/2012/08/maximizing-the-performance-of-the-kettlebell-swing.html#.UCJjY038u8A (http://www.just-fly-sports.com/1/post/2012/08/maximizing-the-performance-of-the-kettlebell-swing.html#.UCJjY038u8A)

Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: LBSS on August 08, 2012, 10:49:38 am
I need to check out that home-made kettlebell article.  The second part of the article is up!

http://www.just-fly-sports.com/1/post/2012/08/maximizing-the-performance-of-the-kettlebell-swing.html#.UCJjY038u8A (http://www.just-fly-sports.com/1/post/2012/08/maximizing-the-performance-of-the-kettlebell-swing.html#.UCJjY038u8A)



fyi, this is the design ross uses: http://www.davedraper.com/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=PmWiki.T-Handle
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: pelham32 on August 09, 2012, 06:14:09 pm
Good link, I've made one from Ross's video. It's very useful for swings but is a no go for snatches... Im planning to shorten the handles though as they can scrape the inside of the thighs a little bit.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: entropy on August 12, 2012, 04:35:33 am
Along the lines of makeshift training, could you get the same benefit by hip hinging and throwing up a medicine ball high up in the air (or over the head behind you) as explosively as possible? And the other way around you could drive the ball into the ground or thru and behind your legs. Would that 'work' and how would it compare with using kettlebells? I don't have a horse in the race just found myself wondering.

Also I have handle holes in my weight plates. Was thinking of running a band thru one hole and using the other one as a handle to do banded cleans like you would with a kettlebell. Not sure if it would work either (i havent tried).

(http://s8.postimage.org/46tfpa6fp/B9d_ZB0w_CWk_KGr_Hq_EOKjc_Ez_Bed_ETHBM53g_P8oj_35.jpg)

edit, ok I tried banded plate swings and it works quite well. It's a lot of fun and it gives a nice little conditioning workout, I did like 11 reps in under 20 seconds with a 5kg plate. Overall did about 5-6 sets. Awersome. 10kg plate worked too and I didnt try bigger plates than that. I'm definitely gonna do these regularly now, I needed a quick hip exercise in my training - this is it!!!

I have a question tho - I can definitely see how it helps train hip explosion, but it's almost entirely leaving out the function of the quads. So can this really be sufficient to make one jump higher or would you need to additionally train the legs using a different exercise like front squats or highbar squats? OP said he just did swings and saw increases in his vertical, perhaps he already had adequate leg strength from his past training though. Just a guess.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: Raptor on August 12, 2012, 07:34:57 am
If you use plates for swings I'd suggest plates no bigger than 10 kg since the diamater increases too much and it becomes a pain to do it (you have to be careful not to hit the ground with the plate etc).

I'd just patch together 2x10g and use them like that instead of using a 20kg plate.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: entropy on August 12, 2012, 07:43:58 am
Yeah I was thinking it might be a problem with the 20s, will see how it goes, I think the 15s might be ok since they're only a little bigger than my 10s and I found them fine.
Title: Re: Kettlebell Swing Science
Post by: LBSS on August 13, 2012, 11:48:48 am
i know a lot of people are fans of overhead throws with medicine balls. t0ddday, for one. charlie francis was, too. obviously, they're different from kb swings because you can only do one at a time -- i gather they're more to train maximum single-effort explosiveness.