For the latest ADARQ.org, click the dated links: *NEW* 08/22/2011, *NEW* 8/10/2011, 07/16/2011, 07/14/2011, MAY DUNK MIX 05/31/2011, 04/31/2011, 03/20/2011, 03/16/2011

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: depth jumps & depth drops  (Read 887 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
adarqui
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14979


im da bess mayne.


View Profile Email
« on: June 11, 2009, 09:11:13 pm »
0


Post anything related to true plyometrics.



1. Does plyometric training improve vertical jump height? A meta-analytical review

Quote
PT provides a statistically significant and practically relevant improvement in vertical jump height with the mean effect ranging from 4.7% (SJ and DJ), over 7.5% (CMJA) to 8.7% (CMJ). These results justify the application of PT for the purpose of development of vertical jump performance in healthy individuals.




2. A Comparison of Plyometric Training Techniques for Improving Vertical Jump Ability and Energy Production

Quote
The 12-week program
resulted in significant increases in vertical jump height
for both training groups. The depth jump group
significantly improved their vertical jump height in all 3
jumps. None of the training methods improved
utilization of elastic energy. In activities involving
dynamic stretch-shorten cycles, drop jump training was
superior to countermovement jump training due to
neuromuscular specificity. This study provides support
for the strength and conditioning professional to include
plyometric depth jump training as part of the athlete's
overall program for improving vertical jumping ability
and concentric contractile performance.



3. The Influence of Varied Rest Interval Lengths on Depth Jump Performance

Quote
After determining their op-
timal depth jump height, the subjects performed 3 sets of 10
depth jumps, each set with a different rest interval duration.
The 3 rest intervals between depth jumps were 15, 30, and
60 seconds and were counterbalanced for each subject. Max-
imal vertical jump height and vertical ground reaction forces
were calculated for each depth jump trial. The Peak Perfor-
mance Motion Measurement System was used to measure
vertical jump height and the Kistler force platform was used
to measure ground reaction forces. Two-way analyses of var-
iance revealed that rest interval length did not affect (p
0.05) vertical jump height or vertical ground reaction forces.
Therefore, this study demonstrated a 15-second rest interval
was sufficient for recovery during the performance of depth
jumps.



4. The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance.

Quote
The experimental group which trained with the load that maximized mechanical power achieved the best overall results in enhancing dynamic athletic performance recording statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvements on most test items and producing statistically superior results to the two other training modalities on the jumping and isokinetic tests.




5. Drop jumping. II. The influence of dropping height on the biomechanics of drop jumping.

Quote
The results of a biomechanical analysis show no difference between DJ20 and DJ40 in mechanical output about the joints during the push-off phase. Peak values of moment and power output about the ankles during the push-off phase were found to be smaller in DJ60 than in DJ40 (DJ20 = DJ60). The amplitude of joint reaction forces increased with dropping height. During DJ60, the net joint reaction forces showed a sharp peak on the instant that the heels came down on the ground. Based on the results, researchers are advised to limit dropping height to 20 or 40 cm when investigating training effects of the execution of bounce drop jumps.






6. A Biomechanical Analysis of the Vertical Jump and Three Modified Plyometric Depth Jumps.

Quote
Maximum moment and power values were calculated for each joint. ANOVAs were used to compare the selected variables from DJ to the corresponding variables in CMJ. All variables from the selected joints were greater with DJ, and 29 of the 33 comparisons were significantly different (p <= 0.05). The corresponding joint moments for ankle, knee, and hip depth jumps were significantly greater than for CMJ. The modified plyometric jumps were shown to enhance the contribution of the muscles that extend the ankle, knee, and hip.



7. Muscle Power and Fiber Characteristics Following 8 Weeks of Plyometric Training

Quote
Peak muscle power output, measured using a countermovement vertical jump, significantly increased from pretraining to posttraining for group 1 (PLYOMETRIC TRAINING) (2.8%) and group 2 (PLYOMETRIC + AEROBIC TRAINING) (2.5%). Each group demonstrated a significant increase in fiber area from pretraining to posttraining for type I (group 1, 4.4%; group 2, 6.1%) and type II (group 1, 7.8%; group 2, 6.8%) fibers, but there were no differences between the groups. Following plyometric training, there is an increased power output that may in part be related to muscle fiber size.



8. The effect of plyometric training on distance running performance

Quote
Following the training period, the E group (PLYOMETRICALLY TRAINED) significantly improved 3-km performance (2.7%) and RE at each of the tested velocities, while no changes in V˙O2max or Thla were recorded. CMJ height, 5BT, and MTS also increased significantly. No significant changes were observed in any measures for the C group. The results clearly demonstrated that a 6-week plyometric programme led to improvements in 3-km running performance. It is postulated that the increase in MTS resulted in improved RE. We speculate that the improved RE led to changes in 3-km running performance, as there were no corresponding alterations in V˙O2max or Thla.



9. Comparison of Dynamic Push-Up Training and Plyometric Push-Up Training on Upper-Body Power and Strength

Quote
The PPU (PLYOMETRIC PUSHUP)
group experienced significantly greater improvements than
the DPU (DYNAMIC PUSHUP) group on the medicine ball put (p
0.03). There
was no significant difference between groups for the chest
press, although the PPU group experienced greater increases




10. EFFICACY OF A MINI-TRAMPOLINE PROGRAM FOR IMPROVING
THE VERTICAL JUMP


Quote
The mini-trampoline appears to be an effective apparatus for
increasing the height of the vertical jump.  Also, the mini-trampoline
seems to elicit better technique from many individuals:  In terms of
balance, there was significantly less forward translation in the jump.
Range of motion, as indicated by knee flexion in the crouch, decreased
for most subjects.  And the coordination of the thigh and shank was
relatively simultaneous after the training program.



11. The effects of plyometric, weight and plyometric-weight training on anaerobic power and muscular strength

Quote
The results showed that all the training treatments elicited significant (P<0.05) improvement in all of the tested variables. However, the combination training group showed signs of improvement in the vertical jump performance, the 50 yard dash, and leg strength that was significantly greater than the improvement in the other 2 training groups (plyometric training and weight training). This study provides support for the use of a combination of traditional weight training and plyometric drills to improve the vertical jumping ability, explosive performance in general and leg strength.


12. Biomechanical analysis of drop and countermovement jumps

Quote
The results obtained for DJ appeared to depend on jumping style. In a subgroup of subjects making a movement of large amplitude (i. e. bending their hips and knees considerably before pushing off) the push-off phase of DJ closely resembled that of CMJ. In a subgroup of subjects making a movement of small amplitude, however, the duration of the push-off phase was shorter, values for moments and mean power output at the knees and ankles were larger, and the mean EMG activity of m. gastrocnemius was higher in DJ than in CMJ. The findings are attributed to the influences of the rapid pre-stretch of knee extensors and plantar flexors after touch-down in DJ. In both subgroups, larger peak resultant reaction forces were found at the knee and ankle joints, and larger peak forces were calculated for the Achilles tendon in DJ than in CMJ.




13. THE EFFECT OF PLYOMETRIC TRAINING ON STRENGTH-SPEED ABILITIES OF BASKETBALL PLAYERS

Quote
The results show a statistically significant increase in the basic mechanical parameters: the height of rise of body mass centre (Hmax) – 0.425±0.054m (I) and 0.464±0.047 m (II) (p<0.01), maximum jump velocity (Vmax)
– 2.829±0.185 m/s (I) and 2.979±0.160 m/s (II) (p<0.01), maximum force
– 1336.9±266.1 N (I) and 1437.5±213.8 N (II) (p<0.01), impulse of force (PF)
– 251.1±31.4 N•s (I) and 268.3±22.7 N•s (II) (p<0.01), maximum power
– 2814.4±615.4 W (I) and 2957.8± 579.8 W (II) (p<0.01), maximum relative
power – 32.6±5.4 W/kg (I) and 34.9±5.1 W/kg (II) (p<0.01), average power
– 1499.6±356.9 W (I) and 1624.4±329.5 W/kg (II) (p<0.01), relative average
power – 17.4±3.2 W/kg (I) and 19.2±3.0 W/kg (II) (p<0.01). No change was
observed in the take-off time – Tto (s), or countermovement depth – Gde (m).
Conclusions. The 8-week basketball training, including the plyometric training, resulted in considerable improvement in the mechanical parameters of the strengthspeed abilities of the players.






14. Does plyometric training improve vertical jump height? A meta-analytical review

Quote
The pooled estimate of the effect of PT on vertical jump height was 4.7% (95% CI 1.8 to 7.6%), 8.7% (95% CI 7.0 to 10.4%), 7.5% (95% CI 4.2 to 10.8%) and 4.7% (95% CI 0.8 to 8.6%) for the SJ, CMJ, CMJA and DJ, respectively. When expressed in standardised units (ie, effect sizes), the effect of PT on vertical jump height was 0.44 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.72), 0.88 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.11), 0.74 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.02) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.18 to 1.05) for the SJ, CMJ, CMJA and DJ, respectively. PT provides a statistically significant and practically relevant improvement in vertical jump height with the mean effect ranging from 4.7% (SJ and DJ), over 7.5% (CMJA) to 8.7% (CMJ). These results justify the application of PT for the purpose of development of vertical jump performance in healthy individuals.



15. The effect of two plyometric training techniques on muscular power and agility in youth soccer players.

Quote
Posttraining, both groups experienced improvements in vertical jump height (p < 0.05) and agility time (p < 0.05) and no change in sprint performance (p > 0.05). There were no differences between the treatment groups (p > 0.05). The study concludes that both DJ and CMJ plyometrics are worthwhile training activities for improving power and agility in youth soccer players.



16. Aquatic Plyometric Training Increases Vertical Jump in Female Volleyball Players.

Quote
Similar increases in VJ were observed in both groups after 4 wk (APT = 3.1%, CON = 4.9%; both P < 0.05); however, the APT (AQUATIC PLYOMETRIC TRAINING) group improved by an additional 8% (P < 0.05) from week 4 to week 6, whereas there was no further improvement in the CON group (-0.9%; P = NS). After 6 wk, both groups displayed significant improvements in concentric peak torque during knee extension and flexion at 60 and 180[degrees][middle dot]s-1 (all P < 0.05).



17. Kinematic Responses to Plyometric Exercises Conducted on Compliant and Noncompliant Surfaces

Quote
This study examined the effects of performing 2 different plyometric exercises, depth jump (DJ) and counter movement jump (CMJ), on noncompliant (ground) and compliant (mini-trampoline) surfaces. Male participants (N = 20; age = 21.8 ± 3.8 years; height = 184.6 ± 7.6 cm; mass = 83.6 ± 8.2 kg) randomly performed 10 CMJ and 10 DJ on compliant and noncompliant surfaces. Kinematic data were determined via 2-dimensional high-speed video. There were significant (p < 0.05) differences in DJ and CMJ joint and segment range of movement for ankle, knee, hip and trunk, indicating less crouch when the participants performed plyometric exercises on the compliant surface.



18. Effects of a plyometric program on vertical landing force and jumping performance in college women

Quote
Although not statistically significant, the mean absolute reduction in vertical ground reaction force in the training group is clinically meaningful. Eight of the 10 women in the training group reduced vertical ground reaction force by 17–18%; however, improvements in jumping performance were not observed. This indicates that programs aimed at enhancing performance must be designed differently from those aimed at reducing landing forces in recreationally athletic women.



19. Relationships between three potentiation effects of plyometric training and performance

Quote
Conclusions: Plyometric training specifically potentiated the normalized EMG, tendon stiffness and elastic energy utilization in the myotendinous complex of the triceps surae. Although these changes are possibly essential determinants, only increases of tendon stiffness were observed to correlate with performance improvements.



20. THE EFFECTS OF A 6-WEEK PLYOMETRIC TRAINING PROGRAM ON AGILITY

Quote
The plyometric training group reduced time on the ground on the posttest compared to the control group. The results of this study show that plyometric training can be an effective training technique to improve an athlete’s agility



21. THE EFFECT OF SHORT-TERM SQUAT VS DEPTH JUMP TRAINING ON VERTICAL JUMP

Quote
The primary results of this experiment indicate that vertical jump was not significantly improved with short-term plyometric or squat training using the design and volume in this study. However, a six-week periodized squat training program did increase 1RM strength. Strength coaches may have to design programs with greater volume or longer duration to elicit significant improvements in vertical jump.



22. Quantifying Plyometric Intensity via Rate of Force Development, Knee Joint, and Ground Reaction Forces

Quote
Results indicate that there are quantitative differences between plyometric exercises in the rate of force development during landing and the forces placed on the knee, though peak GRF forces associated with landing may not differ.



23. Comparative Effect of Three Modes of Plyometric Training on Leg Muscle Strength of University Male Students

Quote
Based on the findings, it was concluded that plyometrics exercises with depth jumping and rebound jumping characteristics are best used in developing muscle strength of the lower extremities.






24. Correlational Effects Of Plyometric Training On Leg Muscle Strength, Endurance And Power Characteristics Of Nigerian University Undergraduates

Quote
Correlation between all other variables was found not to be significant. Based on the finding of the study it was concluded that plyometrics training with repeated jumps horizontally and that which involves rebound jumping on the spot, are capable of improving leg muscle power in similar ways. Moreover, the study also concluded that, plyometrics training is capable of improving leg muscle strength and power significantly




25. The Effect of Drop Jump Starting Height and Contact Time on Power, Work Performed, and Moment of Force

Quote
The instructions given to the subjects were (a) “jump as high as you can” and (b) “jump high a little faster than your previous jump.” Jumps were performed at each height until the athlete could not achieve a shorter ground contact time. The data were divided into 5 groups where group 1 was made up of the longest ground contact times of each athlete and groups 2–4 were composed of progressively shorter contact times, with group 5 having the shortest contact times. The jumps of group 3 produced the highest maximum and mean mechanical power (p <0.05) during the positive phase of the drop jumps regardless of starting jump height. The vertical takeoff velocities for the first 3 groups did not show significant (p < 0.05) differences. These results indicate that the manipulation of jump technique plays larger role than jump height in the manipulation of important jump parameters.



26. A Multi-Test Assessment of Anaerobic Power in Male Athletes: Implications for Sport Specific Testing

Quote
The assessment of sport specific anaerobic power using various field and laboratory tests is often used to chart training progress and identify talent. PURPOSE: To determine if an extensive battery of anaerobic tests could successfully identify differing components of athletic power, predict short sprint performance, and distinguish between worst, average, and best performances. METHODS: 18 male college athletes (23 ± 7 yrs, Height 179 ± 5 cm, Body mass 85 ± 12 kg) performed 8 subclasses of tests to assess specific components of anaerobic power (1RM tests: Smith machine back squat, supine bench press, and barbell power clean; Jump tests: CMVJ, CMVJ + 20kg, CMVJ +40 kg, CONJ, 30cm depth jump, plyometric push up, and standing long jump; 10M sprint, 35M sprint; 10 second Quebec cycle test; 7.2kg overhead shot throw, 3.5kg seated shot throw). RESULTS: T-tests were used to assess any statistical differences between jump variables (Height (cm), Ppower (W), Ppower/kg (W/kg)) for the different jump conditions (CMVJ, CMVJ +20kg, CMVJ + 40kg, CONJ, 30cm depth jump). Correlation coefficients (r) and coefficients of determination (R squared) values were calculated between all test variables to assess commonality between tests. Correlations ranged from r = -0.85 (CD 72.4%) to r = 0.91 (CD 83%) Power produced during the depth jump condition was statistically greater (p ≤ 0.05) compared to all other jump conditions. Measure's corrected for body mass (Ppower/kg) produced stronger correlations when body mass was the primary resistance, and when maximal speed (10 m, 35 m sprints (s)), and height (CMVJ, CONJ) were the performance objectives. Regression analysis highlighted statistically significant groupings of variables, which could in part predict performance (10m sprint, 35m sprint (s), height CMVJ, CONJ (cm), Overhead shot distance (m), Plyopush up power (W)) outcomes. The best three groupings accounted for 65% to 85% of the performance outcomes during the performance tests. CONCLUSIONS: A combined multi-test approach of anerobic power is needed to assess varying force/velocity components of short sprint, jumping, and throwing performance with a greater degree of specificity. Care needs to be taken so that tests do not measure the same components of anaerobic power.







27. Calcium Sensitivity of Human Single Muscle Fibers following Plyometric Training.

Quote
Conclusion: Plyometric training increased single-fiber Ca2+ sensitivity, especially in type I fibers. These changes could not be explained by a modified TnT isoform expression pattern.




28. Use of an Overhead Goal Alters Vertical Jump Performance and Biomechanics

Quote
These results indicate that overhead goals may be incorporated during training and testing protocols to alter lower-extremity biomechanics and can increase performance.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2009, 10:56:23 am by adarqui » Logged

http://adarq.org/code/

"Now Cornell University neurobiologists, studying the adrenal glands of rats, have discovered how chronic stress cranks up the intensity of this adrenaline response. The key to this so-called molecular memory resides in a donut-shaped protein on the surface of cells that secrete adrenaline, the hormone also known as epinephrine."

PED's in drug free sports is cheating, unethical, and weak. Athletes and/or coaches who condone/display this behavior can get lost.


"But you have never felt the burn that you get in the hip flexors from pulling back on the pedal stroke, you have never done the exercise in your life. Squatting ain't doing shit for your hip flexors blu." -- sickenin vendetta.

QuickMix: Gulf Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PHyFdbJnrY&hd=1

The Promise Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed5VRE0lOXU&hd=1

Ballet Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI_c2dz0C_4&hd=1

BoingTerd Dunk Session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6mHaUoNpOg&hd=1

Dunk Films: dunk=surfing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAp_z9fVyMQ

May 2011 Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7MYrl716-k

May13-2011 Nice dunk session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73BhhFenp7o&feature=player_embedded

APRIL 2011 DUNK RECAP/MIX: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuPS1Sm10ds

Some hard freakin` dunks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nukAo_IizA , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU7URZQ3Y4U , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMQo64DzV70

WHO RUN IT DUNK MIX - PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xypWSL5YVEw

adarq.org commercial #2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBYlngDcxFY = if at first you don't succeed, AMP THE F UP & TRY AGAIN.

lion swag dunk mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhyqcL4fO-g

misc dunk footage from 2/20/2011, gettin` up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhF8F43z5Og

end of 2010 dunk session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2fwJ8e5Vs8

The "I think i'm dying dunk mix" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiXkdX5QLNo
adarqui
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14979


im da bess mayne.


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2009, 09:37:44 pm »
0


Does plyometric training improve vertical jump height? A meta-analytical review

The aim of this study was to determine the precise effect of plyometric training (PT) on vertical jump height in healthy individuals. Meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials that evaluated the effect of PT on four typical vertical jump height tests were carried out: squat jump (SJ); countermovement jump (CMJ); countermovement jump with the arm swing (CMJA); and drop jump (DJ). Studies were identified by computerised and manual searches of the literature. Data on changes in jump height for the plyometric and control groups were extracted and statistically pooled in a meta-analysis, separately for each type of jump. A total of 26 studies yielding 13 data points for SJ, 19 data points for CMJ, 14 data points for CMJA and 7 data points for DJ met the initial inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of the effect of PT on vertical jump height was 4.7% (95% CI 1.8 to 7.6%), 8.7% (95% CI 7.0 to 10.4%), 7.5% (95% CI 4.2 to 10.8%) and 4.7% (95% CI 0.8 to 8.6%) for the SJ, CMJ, CMJA and DJ, respectively. When expressed in standardised units (ie, effect sizes), the effect of PT on vertical jump height was 0.44 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.72), 0.88 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.11), 0.74 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.02) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.18 to 1.05) for the SJ, CMJ, CMJA and DJ, respectively. PT provides a statistically significant and practically relevant improvement in vertical jump height with the mean effect ranging from 4.7% (SJ and DJ), over 7.5% (CMJA) to 8.7% (CMJ). These results justify the application of PT for the purpose of development of vertical jump performance in healthy individuals.





Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 1998, 12(2), 85-89

A Comparison of Plyometric Training Techniques for Improving Vertical Jump Ability and Energy Production

This study was done to determine which plyometric
training technique is best for improving vertical jumping
ability, positive energy production, and elastic energy
utilization. Data were collected before and after 12
weeks of jump training and were analyzed by ANOVA.
Subjects (N = 28) performed jumps under 3 testing
conditions-squat jump, countermovement jump, and
depth jump-and were randomly assigned to 1 of 3
groups:
control,
depth
jump
training,
or
countermovement jump training. The 12-week program
resulted in significant increases in vertical jump height
for both training groups. The depth jump group
significantly improved their vertical jump height in all 3
jumps. None of the training methods improved
utilization of elastic energy. In activities involving
dynamic stretch-shorten cycles, drop jump training was
superior to countermovement jump training due to
neuromuscular specificity. This study provides support
for the strength and conditioning professional to include
plyometric depth jump training as part of the athlete's
overall program for improving vertical jumping ability
and concentric contractile performance.







The Influence of Varied Rest Interval Lengths on Depth Jump Performance

The purpose of this study was to measure the effects of var-
ied rest interval lengths on the vertical jump heights and
ground reaction forces during the execution of a depth jump
from a predetermined optimal height. The subjects were 12
men with a mean (SD) age of 25.08
2.43 years. Each sub-
ject’s optimal depth jump height was determined by execut-
ing depth jumps from 10–80 cm. After determining their op-
timal depth jump height, the subjects performed 3 sets of 10
depth jumps, each set with a different rest interval duration.
The 3 rest intervals between depth jumps were 15, 30, and
60 seconds and were counterbalanced for each subject. Max-
imal vertical jump height and vertical ground reaction forces
were calculated for each depth jump trial. The Peak Perfor-
mance Motion Measurement System was used to measure
vertical jump height and the Kistler force platform was used
to measure ground reaction forces. Two-way analyses of var-
iance revealed that rest interval length did not affect (p
0.05) vertical jump height or vertical ground reaction forces.
Therefore, this study demonstrated a 15-second rest interval
was sufficient for recovery during the performance of depth
jumps.





The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance.

APPLIED SCIENCES
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 25(11):1279-1286, November 1993.
WILSON, GREG J.; NEWTON, ROBERT U.; MURPHY, ARON J.; HUMPHRIES, BRENDAN J.

Abstract:
This study was performed to determine which of three theoretically optimal resistance training modalities resulted in the greatest enhancement in the performance of a series of dynamic athletic activities. The three training modalities included 1) traditional weight training, 2) plyometric training, and 3) explosive weight training at the load that maximized mechanical power output. Sixty-four previously trained subjects were randomly allocated to four groups that included the above three training modalities and a control group. The experimental groups trained for 10 wk performing either heavy squat lifts, depth jumps, or weighted squat jumps. All subjects were tested prior to training, after 5 wk of training and at the completion of the training period. The test items included 1) 30-m sprint, 2) vertical jumps performed with and without a countermovement, 3) maximal cycle test, 4) isokinetic leg extension test, and 5) a maximal isometric test. The experimental group which trained with the load that maximized mechanical power achieved the best overall results in enhancing dynamic athletic performance recording statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvements on most test items and producing statistically superior results to the two other training modalities on the jumping and isokinetic tests.





Drop jumping. II. The influence of dropping height on the biomechanics of drop jumping.

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 19(4):339-346, August 1987.
BOBBERT, MAARTEN F.; HUIJING, PETER A.; VAN INGEN SCHENAU, GERRIT JAN

Abstract:
BOBBERT, M. F., P. A. HUIJING, and G. J. VAN INGEN SCHENAU. Drop jumping. II. The influence of dropping height on the biomechanics of drop jumping. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 339-346, 1987. In the literature, athletes preparing for explosive activities are recommended to include drop jumping in their training programs. For the execution of drop jumps, different techniques and different dropping heights can be used. This study was designed to investigate for the performance of bounce drop jumps the influence of dropping height on the biomechanics of the jumps. Six subjects executed bounce drop jumps from heights of 20 cm (designated here as DJ20), 40 cm (designated here as DJ40), and 60 cm (designated here as DJ60). During jumping, they were filmed, and ground reaction forces were recorded.

The results of a biomechanical analysis show no difference between DJ20 and DJ40 in mechanical output about the joints during the push-off phase. Peak values of moment and power output about the ankles during the push-off phase were found to be smaller in DJ60 than in DJ40 (DJ20 = DJ60). The amplitude of joint reaction forces increased with dropping height. During DJ60, the net joint reaction forces showed a sharp peak on the instant that the heels came down on the ground. Based on the results, researchers are advised to limit dropping height to 20 or 40 cm when investigating training effects of the execution of bounce drop jumps.







    A Biomechanical Analysis of the Vertical Jump and Three Modified Plyometric Depth Jumps.

    Article
    Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 10(2):83-88, May 1996.
    Holcomb, William R. 1; Lander, Jeffrey E. 2; Rutland, Rodney M. 3; Wilson, G. Dennis 3

    Abstract:
    Plyometrics are recommended for increasing strength and power. The plyometric depth jump (DJ involves the hip extensors far less than the countermovement jump (CM), thus DJ may not adequately train the hip extensors. This research sought to develop a DJ that would demand more from the hip extensors. Specific jumps were also developed for the ankle and knee extensors. Subjects, 11 college-age men, performed CMJ and DJ from a height of 50 cm. Data were collected to determine net joint moments, power, and work about the joints. Variables were calculated during the down and up phases and for the entire jump. Maximum moment and power values were calculated for each joint. ANOVAs were used to compare the selected variables from DJ to the corresponding variables in CMJ. All variables from the selected joints were greater with DJ, and 29 of the 33 comparisons were significantly different (p <= 0.05). The corresponding joint moments for ankle, knee, and hip depth jumps were significantly greater than for CMJ. The modified plyometric jumps were shown to enhance the contribution of the muscles that extend the ankle, knee, and hip.






Muscle Power and Fiber Characteristics Following 8 Weeks of Plyometric Training

We examined changes in muscle power output and fiber characteristics following a 3 d·wk−1, 8-week plyometric and aerobic exercise program. Male subjects (n = 19) were randomly assigned to either group 1 (plyometric training) or group 2 (plyometric training and aerobic exercise). The plyometric training consisted of vertical jumping, bounding, and depth jumping. Aerobic exercise (at 70% maximum heart rate) was performed for 20 minutes immediately following the plyometric workouts. Muscle biopsy specimens were collected from the musculus vastus lateralis before and after training. Type I and type II fibers were identified and cross-sectional areas calculated. Peak muscle power output, measured using a countermovement vertical jump, significantly increased from pretraining to posttraining for group 1 (2.8%) and group 2 (2.5%). Each group demonstrated a significant increase in fiber area from pretraining to posttraining for type I (group 1, 4.4%; group 2, 6.1%) and type II (group 1, 7.8%; group 2, 6.8%) fibers, but there were no differences between the groups. Following plyometric training, there is an increased power output that may in part be related to muscle fiber size.







The effect of plyometric training on distance running performance

Previous research has reported that plyometric training improves running economy (RE) and ultimately distance-running performance, although the exact mechanism by which this occurs remains unclear. This study examined whether changes in running performance resulting from plyometric training were related to alterations in lower leg musculotendinous stiffness (MTS). Seventeen male runners were pre- and post-tested for lower leg MTS, maximum isometric force, rate of force development, 5-bound distance test (5BT), counter movement jump (CMJ) height , RE, V˙O2max, lactate threshold (Thla), and 3-km time. Subjects were randomly split into an experimental (E) group which completed 6 weeks of plyometric training in conjunction with their normal running training, and a control (C) group which trained as normal. Following the training period, the E group significantly improved 3-km performance (2.7%) and RE at each of the tested velocities, while no changes in V˙O2max or Thla were recorded. CMJ height, 5BT, and MTS also increased significantly. No significant changes were observed in any measures for the C group. The results clearly demonstrated that a 6-week plyometric programme led to improvements in 3-km running performance. It is postulated that the increase in MTS resulted in improved RE. We speculate that the improved RE led to changes in 3-km running performance, as there were no corresponding alterations in V˙O2max or Thla.





Comparison of Dynamic Push-Up Training and Plyometric Push-Up Training on Upper-Body Power and Strength

The purpose of this study was to compare dynamic push-
up (DPU) and plyometric push-up (PPU) training programs
on 2 criterion measures: (a) the distance achieved on a sit-
ting, 2-handed medicine ball put, and (b) the maximum
weight for 1 repetition of a sitting, 2-handed chest press.
Thirty-five healthy women completed 18 training sessions
over a 6-week period, with training time and repetitions
matched for the DPU (n
17) and PPU (n
18) groups.
Dynamic push-ups were completed from the knees, using a
2-second-up–2-second-down cadence. Plyometric push-ups
were also completed from the knees, with the subjects allow-
ing themselves to fall forward onto their hands and then
propelling themselves upward and back to the starting po-
sition, with 1 push-up completed every 4 seconds. The PPU
group experienced significantly greater improvements than
the DPU group on the medicine ball put (p
0.03). There
was no significant difference between groups for the chest
press, although the PPU group experienced greater increases







EFFICACY OF A MINI-TRAMPOLINE PROGRAM FOR IMPROVING
THE VERTICAL JUMP
Andrea L. Ross and Jackie L. Hudson
California State University, Chico, CA  USA

The mean increase of 3.3
cm in jump height was significant.  Thus, it appears that the mini-
trampoline program was effective for increasing the height of the
jump.  It is possible, however, that certain individuals may not benefit
from such a program.  For example, the subject who was considered
the most skillful jumper at the outset of the study did not change jump
height, and the subject with the highest jump decreased jump height
after the training program.  

CONCLUSIONS
     The mini-trampoline appears to be an effective apparatus for
increasing the height of the vertical jump.  Also, the mini-trampoline
seems to elicit better technique from many individuals:  In terms of
balance, there was significantly less forward translation in the jump.
Range of motion, as indicated by knee flexion in the crouch, decreased
for most subjects.  And the coordination of the thigh and shank was
relatively simultaneous after the training program.






 The effects of plyometric, weight and plyometric-weight training on anaerobic power and muscular strength

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 3 different training protocols-plyometric training, weight training, and their combination on the vertical jump performance, anaerobic power and muscular strength. Based on their training, forty-eight male college students were divided into 4 groups: a plyometric training group (n=13), a weight training group (n=11) a plyometric plus weight training group (n=14), and a control group (n=10). The vertical jump, the fifty-yard run and maximal leg strength were measured before and after a six-week training period. Subjects in each of the training groups trained 2 days per week, whereas control subjects did not participate in any training activity. The data was analyzed by a 1-way analysis of variance (repeated-measures design). The results showed that all the training treatments elicited significant (P<0.05) improvement in all of the tested variables. However, the combination training group showed signs of improvement in the vertical jump performance, the 50 yard dash, and leg strength that was significantly greater than the improvement in the other 2 training groups (plyometric training and weight training). This study provides support for the use of a combination of traditional weight training and plyometric drills to improve the vertical jumping ability, explosive performance in general and leg strength.







Biomechanical analysis of drop and countermovement jumps

Summary  For 13 subjects the performance of drop jumps from a height of 40 cm (DJ) and of countermovement jumps (CMJ) was analysed and compared. From force plate and cine data biomechanical variables including forces, moments, power output and amount of work done were calculated for hip, knee and ankle joints. In addition, electromyograms were recorded from five muscles in the lower extremity. The results obtained for DJ appeared to depend on jumping style. In a subgroup of subjects making a movement of large amplitude (i. e. bending their hips and knees considerably before pushing off) the push-off phase of DJ closely resembled that of CMJ. In a subgroup of subjects making a movement of small amplitude, however, the duration of the push-off phase was shorter, values for moments and mean power output at the knees and ankles were larger, and the mean EMG activity of m. gastrocnemius was higher in DJ than in CMJ. The findings are attributed to the influences of the rapid pre-stretch of knee extensors and plantar flexors after touch-down in DJ. In both subgroups, larger peak resultant reaction forces were found at the knee and ankle joints, and larger peak forces were calculated for the Achilles tendon in DJ than in CMJ.








THE EFFECT OF PLYOMETRIC TRAINING ON STRENGTH-SPEED ABILITIES OF BASKETBALL PLAYERS

Tomasz Boraczyński, Jerzy Urniaż
Research Yearbook 2008; 14(1):14-19
ICID: 879011
Article type: Original article
IC™ Value: 5.43
Abstract provided by Publisher     
 
Background. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of plyometric training on the strength-speed abilities of basketball players.
Material and methods. Fourteen players from a third league team participated in two study sessions, at the beginning of the preparation period and after 8 weeks of training. Between the examinations, the players took part in 84 training sessions, among which there were 25 plyometric training sessions.
Results. Biometric characteristics of the players: age 20.3±1.9 years old, body mass 84.4±8.1 kg (I session) and 83.5±7.7 kg (II session) (p<0.01), lean body mass – 73.5±7.3 kg (I) and 73.3± 7.1 kg (II), fat mass 11.0±1.9 kg (I) and 10.1±1.6 kg (II) (p<0.01). The strength-speed abilities were assessed with a test on a force plate, consisting of 10 vertical jumps (CMJ), separated by a 6 second break. The results show a statistically significant increase in the basic mechanical parameters: the height of rise of body mass centre (Hmax) – 0.425±0.054m (I) and 0.464±0.047 m (II) (p<0.01), maximum jump velocity (Vmax)
– 2.829±0.185 m/s (I) and 2.979±0.160 m/s (II) (p<0.01), maximum force
– 1336.9±266.1 N (I) and 1437.5±213.8 N (II) (p<0.01), impulse of force (PF)
– 251.1±31.4 N•s (I) and 268.3±22.7 N•s (II) (p<0.01), maximum power
– 2814.4±615.4 W (I) and 2957.8± 579.8 W (II) (p<0.01), maximum relative
power – 32.6±5.4 W/kg (I) and 34.9±5.1 W/kg (II) (p<0.01), average power
– 1499.6±356.9 W (I) and 1624.4±329.5 W/kg (II) (p<0.01), relative average
power – 17.4±3.2 W/kg (I) and 19.2±3.0 W/kg (II) (p<0.01). No change was
observed in the take-off time – Tto (s), or countermovement depth – Gde (m).
Conclusions. The 8-week basketball training, including the plyometric training, resulted in considerable improvement in the mechanical parameters of the strengthspeed abilities of the players.







« Last Edit: June 11, 2009, 10:44:12 pm by adarqui » Logged

http://adarq.org/code/

"Now Cornell University neurobiologists, studying the adrenal glands of rats, have discovered how chronic stress cranks up the intensity of this adrenaline response. The key to this so-called molecular memory resides in a donut-shaped protein on the surface of cells that secrete adrenaline, the hormone also known as epinephrine."

PED's in drug free sports is cheating, unethical, and weak. Athletes and/or coaches who condone/display this behavior can get lost.


"But you have never felt the burn that you get in the hip flexors from pulling back on the pedal stroke, you have never done the exercise in your life. Squatting ain't doing shit for your hip flexors blu." -- sickenin vendetta.

QuickMix: Gulf Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PHyFdbJnrY&hd=1

The Promise Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed5VRE0lOXU&hd=1

Ballet Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI_c2dz0C_4&hd=1

BoingTerd Dunk Session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6mHaUoNpOg&hd=1

Dunk Films: dunk=surfing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAp_z9fVyMQ

May 2011 Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7MYrl716-k

May13-2011 Nice dunk session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73BhhFenp7o&feature=player_embedded

APRIL 2011 DUNK RECAP/MIX: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuPS1Sm10ds

Some hard freakin` dunks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nukAo_IizA , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU7URZQ3Y4U , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMQo64DzV70

WHO RUN IT DUNK MIX - PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xypWSL5YVEw

adarq.org commercial #2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBYlngDcxFY = if at first you don't succeed, AMP THE F UP & TRY AGAIN.

lion swag dunk mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhyqcL4fO-g

misc dunk footage from 2/20/2011, gettin` up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhF8F43z5Og

end of 2010 dunk session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2fwJ8e5Vs8

The "I think i'm dying dunk mix" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiXkdX5QLNo
adarqui
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 14979


im da bess mayne.


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2009, 03:39:33 pm »
0


Does plyometric training improve vertical jump height? A meta-analytical review

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the precise effect of plyometric training (PT) on vertical jump height in healthy individuals. Meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials that evaluated the effect of PT on four typical vertical jump height tests were carried out: squat jump (SJ); countermovement jump (CMJ); countermovement jump with the arm swing (CMJA); and drop jump (DJ). Studies were identified by computerised and manual searches of the literature. Data on changes in jump height for the plyometric and control groups were extracted and statistically pooled in a meta-analysis, separately for each type of jump. A total of 26 studies yielding 13 data points for SJ, 19 data points for CMJ, 14 data points for CMJA and 7 data points for DJ met the initial inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate of the effect of PT on vertical jump height was 4.7% (95% CI 1.8 to 7.6%), 8.7% (95% CI 7.0 to 10.4%), 7.5% (95% CI 4.2 to 10.8%) and 4.7% (95% CI 0.8 to 8.6%) for the SJ, CMJ, CMJA and DJ, respectively. When expressed in standardised units (ie, effect sizes), the effect of PT on vertical jump height was 0.44 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.72), 0.88 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.11), 0.74 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.02) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.18 to 1.05) for the SJ, CMJ, CMJA and DJ, respectively. PT provides a statistically significant and practically relevant improvement in vertical jump height with the mean effect ranging from 4.7% (SJ and DJ), over 7.5% (CMJA) to 8.7% (CMJ). These results justify the application of PT for the purpose of development of vertical jump performance in healthy individuals.





The effect of two plyometric training techniques on muscular power and agility in youth soccer players.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two plyometric training techniques on power and agility in youth soccer players. Twelve males from a semiprofessional football club's academy (age = 17.3 +/- 0.4 years, stature = 177.9 +/- 5.1 cm, mass = 68.7 +/- 5.6 kg) were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of depth jump (DJ) or countermovement jump (CMJ) training twice weekly. Participants in the DJ group performed drop jumps with instructions to minimize ground-contact time while maximizing height. Participants in the CMJ group performed jumps from a standing start position with instructions to gain maximum jump height. Posttraining, both groups experienced improvements in vertical jump height (p < 0.05) and agility time (p < 0.05) and no change in sprint performance (p > 0.05). There were no differences between the treatment groups (p > 0.05). The study concludes that both DJ and CMJ plyometrics are worthwhile training activities for improving power and agility in youth soccer players.





Aquatic Plyometric Training Increases Vertical Jump in Female Volleyball Players.

Applied Sciences
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 37(10):1814-1819, October 2005.
MARTEL, GREGORY F.; HARMER, MATTHEW L.; LOGAN, JENNIFER M.; PARKER, CHRISTOPHER B.

Abstract:
Purpose: Numerous studies have reported that land-based plyometrics can improve muscular strength, joint stability, and vertical jump (VJ) in athletes; however, due to the intense nature of plyometric training, the potential for acute muscle soreness or even musculoskeletal injury exists. Performance of aquatic plyometric training (APT) could lead to similar benefits, but with reduced risks due to the buoyancy of water. Unfortunately, there is little information regarding the efficacy of APT. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of APT on VJ and muscular strength in volleyball players.

Methods: Nineteen female volleyball players (aged 15 +/- 1 yr) were randomly assigned to perform 6 wk of APT or flexibility exercises (CON) twice weekly, both in addition to traditional preseason volleyball training. Testing of leg strength was performed at baseline and after 6 wk, and VJ was measured at baseline and after 2, 4, and 6 wk.

Results: Similar increases in VJ were observed in both groups after 4 wk (APT = 3.1%, CON = 4.9%; both P < 0.05); however, the APT group improved by an additional 8% (P < 0.05) from week 4 to week 6, whereas there was no further improvement in the CON group (-0.9%; P = NS). After 6 wk, both groups displayed significant improvements in concentric peak torque during knee extension and flexion at 60 and 180[degrees][middle dot]s-1 (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The combination of APT and volleyball training resulted in larger improvements in VJ than in the CON group. Thus, given the likely reduction in muscle soreness with APT versus land-based plyometrics, APT appears to be a promising training option.






Kinematic Responses to Plyometric Exercises Conducted on Compliant and Noncompliant Surfaces

Crowther, R.G., W.L. Spinks, A.S. Leicht, and C.D. Spinks. Kinematic responses to plyometric exercises conducted on compliant and noncompliant surfaces. J. Strength Cond. Res. 21(2):460–465. 2007.—Jumping is an important performance component of many sporting activities. A number of training modalities have been used to enhance jumping performance including plyometrics. The positive effects of plyometric training on jumping performance are a function of the stretch-shortening cycle phenomenon. However, there has been little research on the effects of the surface on jumping performance. This study examined the effects of performing 2 different plyometric exercises, depth jump (DJ) and counter movement jump (CMJ), on noncompliant (ground) and compliant (mini-trampoline) surfaces. Male participants (N = 20; age = 21.8 ± 3.8 years; height = 184.6 ± 7.6 cm; mass = 83.6 ± 8.2 kg) randomly performed 10 CMJ and 10 DJ on compliant and noncompliant surfaces. Kinematic data were determined via 2-dimensional high-speed video. There were significant (p < 0.05) differences in DJ and CMJ joint and segment range of movement for ankle, knee, hip and trunk, indicating less crouch when the participants performed plyometric exercises on the compliant surface.








Effects of a plyometric program on vertical landing force and jumping performance in college women
Physical Therapy in Sport, Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 185-192
J. Vescovi, P. Canavan, S. Hasson

Abstract
Objectives

To examine the effects of a plyometric program on peak vertical ground reaction force as well as kinetic jumping characteristics in recreationally athletic college women.
Design

Six week prospective exercise intervention.
Setting

Division I university campus.
Participants

Twenty college females who competed recreationally in basketball were randomly assigned to a training (n=10) or control (n=10) group.
Main outcome measures

The absolute change values for vertical ground reaction force, countermovement jump height, peak and average jump power, and peak jump velocity. Comparisons were made using Mann–Whitney U tests.
Results

Vertical ground reaction force decreased in the intervention group (−222.8±610.9N), but was not statistically different (p=0.122) compared to the change observed in the control group (54.6±257.6N). There was no difference in the absolute change values between groups for countermovement jump height (1.0±2.8cm vs. −0.2±1.5cm, p=0.696) or any of the associated kinetic variables following the 6-week intervention.
Conclusions

Although not statistically significant, the mean absolute reduction in vertical ground reaction force in the training group is clinically meaningful. Eight of the 10 women in the training group reduced vertical ground reaction force by 17–18%; however, improvements in jumping performance were not observed. This indicates that programs aimed at enhancing performance must be designed differently from those aimed at reducing landing forces in recreationally athletic women.







Relationships between three potentiation effects of plyometric training and performance

This study measured the potentiation effects of plyometric training [normalized electromyography (EMG) in triceps surae, stiffness and elastic energy utilization of the Achilles tendon] and investigated the correlations between these effects and performances [voluntary electromechanical delay (EMD) and jump height]. Twenty-one subjects were randomly assigned either to the control group (10 subjects: age 22.3±1.6 years) or to a training group (11 subjects: age 22.1±1.6 years) that performed 8 weeks of plyometric training. Results: As compared with the performances before training, normalized EMG in the soleus were significantly (P≤0.001) increased after 4 and 8 weeks of training. Tendon stiffness, elastic energy storage, release and jump height determined after training were significantly increased (P<0.05), with a concomitantly reduced voluntary EMD (P=0.01). These variables also showed significant differences vs the control group (all P<0.05). The other variables remained unchanged. Correlations were observed between tendon stiffness and either voluntary EMD (r=−0. 77, P=0.014) or jump height (r=0.54, P=0.031). Conclusions: Plyometric training specifically potentiated the normalized EMG, tendon stiffness and elastic energy utilization in the myotendinous complex of the triceps surae. Although these changes are possibly essential determinants, only increases of tendon stiffness were observed to correlate with performance improvements.









THE EFFECTS OF A 6-WEEK PLYOMETRIC TRAINING
PROGRAM ON AGILITY

The purpose of the study was to determine if six weeks of plyometric training can improve an athlete’s
agility. Subjects were divided into two groups, a plyometric training and a control group. The plyometric
training group performed in a six week plyometric training program and the control group did not
perform any plyometric training techniques. All subjects participated in two agility tests: T-test and
Illinois Agility Test, and a force plate test for ground reaction times both pre and post testing. Univariate
ANCOVAs were conducted to analyze the change scores (post – pre) in the independent variables by
group (training or control) with pre scores as covariates. The Univariate ANCOVA revealed a significant
group effect F
2,26
= 25.42, p=0.0000 for the T-test agility measure. For the Illinois Agility test, a
significant group effect F
2,26
= 27.24, p = 0.000 was also found. The plyometric training group had
quicker posttest times compared to the control group for the agility tests. A significant group effect F
2,26
= 7.81, p = 0.002 was found for the Force Plate test. The plyometric training group reduced time on the
ground on the posttest compared to the control group. The results of this study show that plyometric
training can be an effective training technique to improve an athlete’s agility








THE EFFECT OF SHORT-TERM SQUAT VS DEPTH JUMP TRAINING ON VERTICAL JUMP

KL Bebernes, LE Brown FACSM, JW Coburn, B Beam, SM Zinder

Human Performance Laboratory. California State University, Fullerton. Fullerton, CA

A wide variety of sports rely on training techniques to enhance an athlete’s power output. Vertical jump is a reliable way to test for power; therefore the purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a short-term squat (S) training program or a depth jump (DJ) training program on vertical jump performance and one repetition maximum (1RM) strength. 30 male (n=16) and female (n=14) university students (age 24.03 ± 4.67 years, height 67.14 ± 3.38 cm, weight 169.40 ± 33.63 lb) were assigned to three groups: S, DJ or control (C). The subjects in the intervention groups participated in periodized training three days a week for a total of six weeks whereas the control group did not train. Vertical jump height, 1RM and ground reaction force (GRF) were tested before and after training and the alpha level was set at 0.05.  Three way ANOVA analysis of variance results demonstrated a significant (p = 0.007) increase in 1RM for the squat group of 15.05% (pre=254 ± 73.09; post=299 ± 81.73lb). Vertical jump increased in all three groups (DJ pre=19.85 ± 4.33 to 20.75 ± 4.30; S pre=20.55 ± 4.44 to 22.2 ± 4.11; C pre=19.43 ± 4.6 to 20.5 ± 4.56) but not significantly different from one another. GRF did not change from pre to post in any group. The primary results of this experiment indicate that vertical jump was not significantly improved with short-term plyometric or squat training using the design and volume in this study. However, a six-week periodized squat training program did increase 1RM strength. Strength coaches may have to design programs with greater volume or longer duration to elicit significant improvements in vertical jump.








Quantifying Plyometric Intensity via Rate of Force Development, Knee Joint, and Ground Reaction Forces

Randall L. Jensen1, 3 and William P. Ebben2

1. Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan 49855, 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Program in Exercise Science, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, 3. Address correspondence to Dr. Randall L. Jensen, E-mail: rajensen@nmu.edu

Options:

    * Create Reference
    * Email this Article
    * Add to MyArchive

Search Google Scholar for:

    * Randall L. Jensen
    * William P. Ebben

Jensen, R.L., and W.P. Ebben. Quantifying plyometric intensity via rate of force development, knee joint, and ground reaction forces. J. Strength Cond. Res. 21(3):763–767. 2007.—Because the intensity of plyometric exercises usually is based simply upon anecdotal recommendations rather than empirical evidence, this study sought to quantify a variety of these exercises based on forces placed upon the knee. Six National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes who routinely trained with plyometric exercises performed depth jumps from 46 and 61 cm, a pike jump, tuck jump, single-leg jump, countermovement jump, squat jump, and a squat jump holding dumbbells equal to 30% of 1 repetition maximum (RM). Ground reaction forces obtained via an AMTI force plate and video analysis of markers placed on the left hip, knee, lateral malleolus, and fifth metatarsal were used to estimate rate of eccentric force development (E-RFD), peak ground reaction forces (GRF), ground reaction forces relative to body weight (GRF/BW), knee joint reaction forces (K-JRF), and knee joint reaction forces relative to body weight (K-JRF/BW) for each plyometric exercise. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance indicated that E-RFD, K-JRF, and K-JRF/BW were different across the conditions (p < 0.05), but peak GRF and GRF/BW were not (p > 0.05). Results indicate that there are quantitative differences between plyometric exercises in the rate of force development during landing and the forces placed on the knee, though peak GRF forces associated with landing may not differ.






Comparative Effect of Three Modes of Plyometric Training on
Leg Muscle Strength of University Male Students
 
 
Ademola Olasupo Abass
Department of Human Kinetics and Health Education
Faculty Of Education, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
E-mail: dokidemo@yahoo.com
 
 
Abstract
 
This study determined the comparative effect of three modes of Plyometrics
training [depth jumping, rebound jumping and horizontal jumping] on leg muscle strength
of untrained University male students. Participants were forty untrained male University
students within the age range of 18-27 years. The randomized pretest-posttest control group
design was adopted. Subjects were randomly assigned to control group, and three
experimental groups based on the types of plyometrics training adopted for the study. The
training programme consisted of twelve weeks of interval training administered three times
a week. Data collected were analyzed using the mean score, standard deviation and range.
Analysis of Covariance [ANCOVA] was used to test for significant differences in the post-
test measures among the treatment and control groups using the pretest score variation as
covariates. Scheffe post hoc analysis was used to determine which of the means were
significantly different. All hypotheses for the study were tested at 0.05 critical level.
Findings revealed that only the depth jumping and rebound jumping training
significantly altered leg muscle strength of subjects (P<0.05). Based on the findings, it was
concluded that plyometrics exercises with depth jumping and rebound jumping
characteristics are best used in developing muscle strength of the lower extremities.










Correlational Effects Of Plyometric Training On Leg Muscle Strength, Endurance
And Power Characteristics Of Nigerian University Undergraduates
Ademola O. Abass
Department of Human Kinetics And Health Education
Faculty of Education
University of Ibadan, Ibadan
Nigeria.
E-mail: dokidemo@yahoo.com
Phone: +2348055436276
Abstract
This study focused on the relationship among strength, endurance and power performance
characteristics of untrained university undergraduates following three different modes of plyometric
training. Participants were 40 untrained volunteer male undergraduates, randomly assigned to
three experimental plyometric training groups of depth jumping, rebound jumping and horizontal
jumping over a distance, and a fourth group which served as the control. The three experimental
groups were made to go through a 12-week exercise programme based on plyometric training
procedures. Interval training method was adopted while the progressive resistance training principle
was considered to determine the duration and intensity of training. Data collected were analyzed
using the mean, standard deviation and range. Relationship between variables was determined
using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient. Results show that there were no
significant relationships among the groups in strength and endurance performance characteristics.
Significant correlations were recorded in power performance between horizontal jumping and
rebound jumping group [0.672; P= 0.033]. All other interactions among the groups on leg
power were not significant. On relationship among the three variables based on pooled data across
the groups, significant correlation was recorded only between muscle strength and power
[0.327;P= 0.039]. Correlation between all other variables was found not to be significant. Based
on the finding of the study it was concluded that plyometrics training with repeated jumps
horizontally and that which involves rebound jumping on the spot, are capable of improving leg
muscle power in similar ways. Moreover, the study also concluded that, plyometrics training is
capable of improving leg muscle strength and power significantly







The Effect of Drop Jump Starting Height and Contact Time on Power, Work Performed, and Moment of Force

Walsh, M., A. Arampatzis, F. Schade, and G.-P. Brüggemann. The effect of drop jump starting height and contact time on power, work performed, and moment of force. J. Strength Cond. Res. 18(3):561–566. 2004.—The purposes of this study are (a) to examine the effects of contact time manipulation on jump parameters and (b) to examine the interaction between starting height changes and contact time changes on important jump parameters. Fifteen male athletes performed a series of drop jumps from heights of 20, 40, and 60 cm. The instructions given to the subjects were (a) “jump as high as you can” and (b) “jump high a little faster than your previous jump.” Jumps were performed at each height until the athlete could not achieve a shorter ground contact time. The data were divided into 5 groups where group 1 was made up of the longest ground contact times of each athlete and groups 2–4 were composed of progressively shorter contact times, with group 5 having the shortest contact times. The jumps of group 3 produced the highest maximum and mean mechanical power (p <0.05) during the positive phase of the drop jumps regardless of starting jump height. The vertical takeoff velocities for the first 3 groups did not show significant (p < 0.05) differences. These results indicate that the manipulation of jump technique plays larger role than jump height in the manipulation of important jump parameters.











A Multi-Test Assessment of Anaerobic Power in Male Athletes: Implications for Sport Specific Testing.

The assessment of sport specific anaerobic power using various field and laboratory tests is often used to chart training progress and identify talent. PURPOSE: To determine if an extensive battery of anaerobic tests could successfully identify differing components of athletic power, predict short sprint performance, and distinguish between worst, average, and best performances. METHODS: 18 male college athletes (23 ± 7 yrs, Height 179 ± 5 cm, Body mass 85 ± 12 kg) performed 8 subclasses of tests to assess specific components of anaerobic power (1RM tests: Smith machine back squat, supine bench press, and barbell power clean; Jump tests: CMVJ, CMVJ + 20kg, CMVJ +40 kg, CONJ, 30cm depth jump, plyometric push up, and standing long jump; 10M sprint, 35M sprint; 10 second Quebec cycle test; 7.2kg overhead shot throw, 3.5kg seated shot throw). RESULTS: T-tests were used to assess any statistical differences between jump variables (Height (cm), Ppower (W), Ppower/kg (W/kg)) for the different jump conditions (CMVJ, CMVJ +20kg, CMVJ + 40kg, CONJ, 30cm depth jump). Correlation coefficients (r) and coefficients of determination (R squared) values were calculated between all test variables to assess commonality between tests. Correlations ranged from r = -0.85 (CD 72.4%) to r = 0.91 (CD 83%) Power produced during the depth jump condition was statistically greater (p ≤ 0.05) compared to all other jump conditions. Measure's corrected for body mass (Ppower/kg) produced stronger correlations when body mass was the primary resistance, and when maximal speed (10 m, 35 m sprints (s)), and height (CMVJ, CONJ) were the performance objectives. Regression analysis highlighted statistically significant groupings of variables, which could in part predict performance (10m sprint, 35m sprint (s), height CMVJ, CONJ (cm), Overhead shot distance (m), Plyopush up power (W)) outcomes. The best three groupings accounted for 65% to 85% of the performance outcomes during the performance tests. CONCLUSIONS: A combined multi-test approach of anerobic power is needed to assess varying force/velocity components of short sprint, jumping, and throwing performance with a greater degree of specificity. Care needs to be taken so that tests do not measure the same components of anaerobic power.












Calcium Sensitivity of Human Single Muscle Fibers following Plyometric Training.

BASIC SCIENCES
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 38(11):1901-1908, November 2006.
MALISOUX, LAURENT 1; FRANCAUX, MARC 1; NIELENS, HENRI 1; RENARD, PATRICIA 2; LEBACQ, JEAN 3; THEISEN, DANIEL 1

Abstract:
Purpose: To study the effect of plyometric training on Ca2+ sensitivity and the influence of troponin T (TnT) isoforms on Ca2+-activation properties in skinned human muscle fibers.

Methods: Biopsies were obtained from the vastus lateralis of eight men before and after the training period. Chemically skinned fibers were evaluated regarding their Ca2+-activation properties and were classified according to their myosin heavy chain (MHC) contents and analyzed regarding their slow and fast TnT isoforms.

Results: After training, significant improvements (P < 0.05) were found for static jump, countermovement jump, 6 x 5-m shuttle-run test, and leg-press performances. An 8% increase in the proportion of type IIa fibers (P < 0.05) was observed. Single-fiber diameters increased by 11% in type I (P < 0.01), 10% in type IIa (P < 0.001), and 15% in type IIa/IIx fibers (P < 0.001). Peak fiber force increased by 35% in type I (P < 0.001), 25% in type IIa (P < 0.001), and 57% in type IIa/IIx fibers (P < 0.01). The Ca2+-activation threshold was not altered by training, but the Ca2+ concentration required to elicit half-maximal activation showed a decreasing trend, with significant changes in type I fibers (P < 0.001). Cooperativity at low Ca2+ concentrations was increased in type I and type IIa/IIx fibers (P < 0.05). Type I fibers exclusively expressed slow TnT isoforms, and type II fibers were always associated with fast TnT isoforms, independent of training status. Therefore, changes in Ca2+ sensitivity after training could not be explained by differential fast or slow TnT isoform expression.

Conclusion: Plyometric training increased single-fiber Ca2+ sensitivity, especially in type I fibers. These changes could not be explained by a modified TnT isoform expression pattern.










The Effect of Short-Term VertiMax vs. Depth Jump Training on Vertical Jump Performance.

Original Research
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 22(2):321-325, March 2008.
McClenton, LaKeysha S; Brown, Lee E; Coburn, Jared W; Kersey, Robert D

Abstract:
The ability to generate lower body explosive power is considered an important factor in many athletic activities. Thirty-one men and women, recreationally trained volunteers, were randomly assigned to 3 different groups (control, n = 10; VertiMax, n = 11; and depth jump, n = 10). A Vertec measuring device was used to test vertical jump height pre- and post-training. All subjects trained twice weekly for 6 weeks, performing approximately 140 jumps. The VertiMax group increased elastic resistance and decreased volume each week, while the depth jump group increased both box height and volume each week. The depth jump group significantly increased their vertical jump height (pre: 20.5 +/- 3.98; post: 22.65 +/- 4.09), while the VertiMax (pre: 22.18 +/- 4.31; post: 23.36 +/- 4.06) and control groups (pre: 15.65 +/- 4.51; post: 15.85 +/- 4.17) did not change. These findings suggest that, within the volume and intensity constraints of this study, depth jump training twice weekly for 6 weeks is more beneficial than VertiMax jump training for increasing vertical jump height. Strength professionals should focus on depth jump exercises in the short term over commercially available devices to improve vertical jump performance.









Use of an Overhead Goal Alters Vertical Jump Performance and Biomechanics

Kevin R. Ford1, 4, Gregory D. Myer1, Rose L. Smith2, Robyn N. Byrnes2, Sara E. Dopirak2, and Timothy E. Hewett1, 3, 2

1. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center, and Human Performance Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, 2. University of Cincinnati, College of Allied Health Sciences, Physical Therapy Department, Cincinnati, Ohio, 3. University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics and Orthopaedic Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio, 4. Address correspondence to Kevin R. Ford, M.S., E-mail: Kevin.Ford@cchmc.org

Options:

* Create Reference
* Email this Article
* Add to MyArchive

Search Google Scholar for:

* Kevin R. Ford
* Gregory D. Myer
* Rose L. Smith
* Robyn N. Byrnes
* Sara E. Dopirak
* Timothy E. Hewett

Ford, K.R., G.D. Myer, R.L. Smith, R.N. Byrnes, S.E. Dopirak, and T.E. Hewett. Use of an overhead goal alters vertical jump performance and biomechanics. J. Strength Cond. Res. 19(2):394–399. 2005.—This study examined whether an extrinsic motivator, such as an overhead goal, during a plyometric jump may alter movement biomechanics. Our purpose was to examine the effects of an overhead goal on vertical jump height and lower-extremity biomechanics during a drop vertical jump and to compare the effects on female (N = 1Cool versus male (N = 17) athletes. Drop vertical jump was performed both with and without the use of an overhead goal. Greater vertical jump height (p = 0.002) and maximum takeoff external knee flexion (quadriceps) moment (p = 0.04) were attained with the overhead goal condition versus no overhead goal. Men had significantly greater vertical jump height (p < 0.001), maximum takeoff vertical force (p = 0.009), and maximum takeoff hip extensor moment (p = 0.02) compared with women. A significant gender × overhead goal interaction was found for stance time (p = 0.02) and maximum ankle (p = 0.04) and knee flexion angles (p = 0.04), with shorter stance times and lower angles in men during overhead goal time. These results indicate that overhead goals may be incorporated during training and testing protocols to alter lower-extremity biomechanics and can increase performance.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2009, 10:55:11 am by adarqui » Logged

http://adarq.org/code/

"Now Cornell University neurobiologists, studying the adrenal glands of rats, have discovered how chronic stress cranks up the intensity of this adrenaline response. The key to this so-called molecular memory resides in a donut-shaped protein on the surface of cells that secrete adrenaline, the hormone also known as epinephrine."

PED's in drug free sports is cheating, unethical, and weak. Athletes and/or coaches who condone/display this behavior can get lost.


"But you have never felt the burn that you get in the hip flexors from pulling back on the pedal stroke, you have never done the exercise in your life. Squatting ain't doing shit for your hip flexors blu." -- sickenin vendetta.

QuickMix: Gulf Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PHyFdbJnrY&hd=1

The Promise Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed5VRE0lOXU&hd=1

Ballet Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI_c2dz0C_4&hd=1

BoingTerd Dunk Session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6mHaUoNpOg&hd=1

Dunk Films: dunk=surfing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAp_z9fVyMQ

May 2011 Dunk Mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7MYrl716-k

May13-2011 Nice dunk session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73BhhFenp7o&feature=player_embedded

APRIL 2011 DUNK RECAP/MIX: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VuPS1Sm10ds

Some hard freakin` dunks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nukAo_IizA , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU7URZQ3Y4U , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMQo64DzV70

WHO RUN IT DUNK MIX - PART 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xypWSL5YVEw

adarq.org commercial #2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBYlngDcxFY = if at first you don't succeed, AMP THE F UP & TRY AGAIN.

lion swag dunk mix: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhyqcL4fO-g

misc dunk footage from 2/20/2011, gettin` up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhF8F43z5Og

end of 2010 dunk session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2fwJ8e5Vs8

The "I think i'm dying dunk mix" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiXkdX5QLNo
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

powered by TickerIt