Author Topic: beast  (Read 342808 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kingfish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2157
  • Respect: +1495
    • View Profile
Re: beast
« Reply #735 on: May 06, 2013, 10:16:11 am »
0
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7ZDSaHysko" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7ZDSaHysko</a>


looking at that vid again for some squat form cues to improve mine, i just noticed that he let go of the valsalva / relaxed at the bottom. WTF! :wowthatwasnutswtf:

5'10" | 210lbs | 39 yrs
reach - 7'8" (92") |paused full squat - 545x1| standing VJ - 40"|

absolute unit

Daily Squats Day 1 - Aug 30, 2011 and still going.

LanceSTS

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
  • Respect: +550
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/LanceSTS
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #736 on: May 06, 2013, 11:38:09 am »
0

Right, which is why I said GOOD GENES/STRUCTURE FOR STRENGTH.  His olympic lifts are also very far from what a typical "genetic freak" would have even with poor technique if they had his squat strength.

Ah, I see.   So much confusion for me as to how people from different backgrounds use words; in a lifting context strength is defined by squatting and power defined by the pulls?   In sprinting strength refers almost exclusively to speed endurance; we would say a miler has endurance, a great 400m runner has to have a lot of strength while a 100m runner has power.   I guess we are perhaps the most wrong from a physical standpoint.

 Yeah Todday I think we are saying the same basic thing, you can have a good structure/proportions for one strength event and not be a  "genetic freak" in all power/speed activities across the spectrum.   Max squat to max power snatch is a general way in olympic lifting to tell how much on the "speed" end someone generally is.  Not always, most the time though, the guys with a smaller difference in the two tend to be the most genetically "gifted" athletes.
Relax.

LanceSTS

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
  • Respect: +550
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/LanceSTS
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #737 on: May 06, 2013, 11:42:38 am »
0
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7ZDSaHysko" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7ZDSaHysko</a>


looking at that vid again for some squat form cues to improve mine, i just noticed that he let go of the valsalva / relaxed at the bottom. WTF! :wowthatwasnutswtf:


He lets some air out for sure, just not all of it.  You can still maintain abdominal tightness while going through breathing cycles though, think of heavy weighted planks held for ~1min.  Definitely not something for beginners to try though.
Relax.

Flander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2706
  • One beast coming up
  • Respect: +312
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #738 on: May 07, 2013, 05:01:23 am »
0

Right, which is why I said GOOD GENES/STRUCTURE FOR STRENGTH.  His olympic lifts are also very far from what a typical "genetic freak" would have even with poor technique if they had his squat strength.

Ah, I see.   So much confusion for me as to how people from different backgrounds use words; in a lifting context strength is defined by squatting and power defined by the pulls?   In sprinting strength refers almost exclusively to speed endurance; we would say a miler has endurance, a great 400m runner has to have a lot of strength while a 100m runner has power.   I guess we are perhaps the most wrong from a physical standpoint.

 Yeah Todday I think we are saying the same basic thing, you can have a good structure/proportions for one strength event and not be a  "genetic freak" in all power/speed activities across the spectrum.   Max squat to max power snatch is a general way in olympic lifting to tell how much on the "speed" end someone generally is.  Not always, most the time though, the guys with a smaller difference in the two tend to be the most genetically "gifted" athletes.

What are the best squat to power snatch ratios youve heard of Lance?

TKXII

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1255
  • Respect: -12
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #739 on: May 11, 2013, 05:55:41 pm »
0
no one posted this...? when is this guy gonna start dunking again..

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALehwPQtNv4" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALehwPQtNv4</a>
"Performance during stretch-shortening cycle exercise is influenced by the visco-elastic properties of the muscle-tendon units. During stretching of an activated muscle, mechanical energy is absorbed in the tendon structures (tendon and aponeurosis) and this energy can subsequently be re-utilized if shortening of the muscle immediately follows the stretching. According to Biscotti (2000), 72% of the elastic energy restitution action comes from tendons, 28% - from contractile elements of muscles.

http://www.verkhoshansky.com/Portals/0/Presentations/Shock%20Method%20Plyometrics.pdf

ChrisM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1880
  • Respect: +1370
    • View Profile
Re: beast
« Reply #740 on: May 11, 2013, 06:25:08 pm »
0
Damn, that is impressive. Has he tested his vert? I know about his dunks vids and he definitely gets up.

Insert motivational quote here...

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14563
  • Respect: +2483
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #741 on: May 11, 2013, 07:19:20 pm »
0
I wonder what his halfsquat is, if he has a 3x squat.

LanceSTS

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
  • Respect: +550
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/LanceSTS
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #742 on: May 14, 2013, 01:28:03 pm »
0

Right, which is why I said GOOD GENES/STRUCTURE FOR STRENGTH.  His olympic lifts are also very far from what a typical "genetic freak" would have even with poor technique if they had his squat strength.

Ah, I see.   So much confusion for me as to how people from different backgrounds use words; in a lifting context strength is defined by squatting and power defined by the pulls?   In sprinting strength refers almost exclusively to speed endurance; we would say a miler has endurance, a great 400m runner has to have a lot of strength while a 100m runner has power.   I guess we are perhaps the most wrong from a physical standpoint.

 Yeah Todday I think we are saying the same basic thing, you can have a good structure/proportions for one strength event and not be a  "genetic freak" in all power/speed activities across the spectrum.   Max squat to max power snatch is a general way in olympic lifting to tell how much on the "speed" end someone generally is.  Not always, most the time though, the guys with a smaller difference in the two tend to be the most genetically "gifted" athletes.

What are the best squat to power snatch ratios youve heard of Lance?

315 squat , 225 power snatch
Relax.

LanceSTS

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
  • Respect: +550
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/LanceSTS
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #743 on: May 14, 2013, 01:28:51 pm »
+7
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbiPdJbNaI0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbiPdJbNaI0</a>
Relax.

ChrisM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1880
  • Respect: +1370
    • View Profile
Re: beast
« Reply #744 on: May 14, 2013, 01:35:48 pm »
+2
Good god. Insane quads!
Insert motivational quote here...

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12851
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7957
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #745 on: May 14, 2013, 03:07:00 pm »
0
jesus christ.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6007
  • Respect: +3797
    • View Profile
Re: beast
« Reply #746 on: May 14, 2013, 03:26:08 pm »
+1
3.27*BW, raw and not spotted?

Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Flander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2706
  • One beast coming up
  • Respect: +312
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #747 on: May 14, 2013, 03:49:11 pm »
0

Right, which is why I said GOOD GENES/STRUCTURE FOR STRENGTH.  His olympic lifts are also very far from what a typical "genetic freak" would have even with poor technique if they had his squat strength.

Ah, I see.   So much confusion for me as to how people from different backgrounds use words; in a lifting context strength is defined by squatting and power defined by the pulls?   In sprinting strength refers almost exclusively to speed endurance; we would say a miler has endurance, a great 400m runner has to have a lot of strength while a 100m runner has power.   I guess we are perhaps the most wrong from a physical standpoint.

 Yeah Todday I think we are saying the same basic thing, you can have a good structure/proportions for one strength event and not be a  "genetic freak" in all power/speed activities across the spectrum.   Max squat to max power snatch is a general way in olympic lifting to tell how much on the "speed" end someone generally is.  Not always, most the time though, the guys with a smaller difference in the two tend to be the most genetically "gifted" athletes.

What are the best squat to power snatch ratios youve heard of Lance?

315 squat , 225 power snatch

Nasty.

Flander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2706
  • One beast coming up
  • Respect: +312
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #748 on: May 14, 2013, 03:51:47 pm »
0
I want his quads. Damn they look nasty good.

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12851
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7957
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: beast
« Reply #749 on: May 14, 2013, 04:30:48 pm »
+2
more of that dude:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ2mwtjEsoU" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ2mwtjEsoU</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG4L29o8phM" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG4L29o8phM</a>

 :ffffffuuuuuu:
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter