Author Topic: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??  (Read 7570 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« on: March 31, 2012, 02:09:33 am »
+1
what's up guys

got a PR standing vert of 1.5 inches , which is enormous for me

my concern isn't so much over the accuracy of the mat, but rather the way i jumped.  Previously when i tested my vert on the mat i would jump and just swing up both arms.  This time what i did was try to touch an object with 1 arm, while keeping the other relaxed.   I'm unsure if part of the PR height was  because i jumped and only reached up with one arm which made me land slightly leg bent, or if the jump was really legit and jumping while trying to touch an object really did help me jump significantly higher

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jy1_oyxkR2k" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jy1_oyxkR2k</a>

Mikey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • Respect: +2787
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/Mutumbo000?feature=mhee
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2012, 02:25:35 am »
0
Easy way to measure if it's accurate is just to measure the object that you touched. It looked like you touched the ceiling so measure how high that is and than deduct your standing reach from it. Impressive vertical!
"IMO, It didn't happen if it's not on vid/official"- adarqui

It's easier to keep up than it is to catch up...

nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2012, 02:35:25 am »
0
i measured the ceiling a couple weeks ago at 10 ft 8.

need to re measure my reach since haven't in a couple years last time it was about 7 ft 10-11

on the jump i touched the ceiling with a couple fingers, which means i got a little higher than 10 ft 8

Mikey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • Respect: +2787
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/Mutumbo000?feature=mhee
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2012, 03:08:18 am »
0
Well 3 feet is 36 inches and if you said you got a bit higher than that it seems the 36.9 would be legit. Take 2 inches off since the ceiling was 10'8 instead of 10'10 and it would be about 34.9. If your reach was 7'11 instead of 7'10 you'd still have 33.9, which is basically 34 anyway.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2012, 03:58:16 am by Mutumbo000 »
"IMO, It didn't happen if it's not on vid/official"- adarqui

It's easier to keep up than it is to catch up...

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6007
  • Respect: +3797
    • View Profile
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2012, 03:48:47 am »
0
Hey mike , you know i follow you and support you from the beginning!
As i told you in youtube , i think its 3-4'' off.
I remember you were 7'11'' like me , so 10'8'' = 33''. Give 1 inch for reach and 1 inch for getting a bit more than touching it , max 35'' if you ask me.
Think of it that way: if you were 37''/7'11'' you would be able to touch a 10'' rim 4'' below your wrist from SVJ.

I dont trust jumpmats and hangtimes etc , they give a good estimation but the only legit method is [highest touch - standing reach]

Btw , legit 33+ is still awesome for SVJ , your progress is amazing , keep it up!  :headbang:  :highfive:
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Kingfish

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2157
  • Respect: +1495
    • View Profile
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2012, 04:12:47 am »
+1
^ heres a 34" vid i took before. compare and see if he is any higher. my measured SVJs are very accurate to the inch  :headbang:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VWj-FXmox8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VWj-FXmox8</a>
5'10" | 210lbs | 39 yrs
reach - 7'8" (92") |paused full squat - 545x1| standing VJ - 40"|

absolute unit

Daily Squats Day 1 - Aug 30, 2011 and still going.

nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2012, 10:22:38 pm »
0
how can we tell from your vid, kingfish??

also, a previous thread on this fourm regarding the jump mat and vertec for vert testing

http://www.adarq.org/forum/strength-power-reactivity-speed-discussion/jump-mats/?action=printpage


as far as the mechanics of the jump go.  if you watch in slow mo i do land actually pretty straight legged, the only thing i see is that my left foot kind of hitches a little which could possibly start the timer early.  I don't think it would since the majority of my bodyweight is still on the mat, i'll play around with it next time though and see if it starts early if i do that


^ heres a 34" vid i took before. compare and see if he is any higher. my measured SVJs are very accurate to the inch  :headbang:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VWj-FXmox8" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VWj-FXmox8</a>
« Last Edit: March 31, 2012, 11:25:05 pm by nba8340 »

AGC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1623
  • Respect: +1194
    • View Profile
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2012, 08:31:34 am »
0
I played Kingfish's and your vid side-by-side and timed it so that you both started jumping at the same time and they're almost exactly the same, so I think it's closer to 34-35'' (which is nice by the way).

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2012, 01:49:49 pm »
0
props, nasty PRs still coming.

regardless of if or why it happened, jumping while reaching up for objects will lead to the highest jumps, more often than not. but ya changing the way you jump on the mat, will change the accuracy of your results slightly when comparing to other styles of jumps on the mat.

pC

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12851
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7957
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2012, 04:48:23 pm »
0
whatever, those jumps were high as shit.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

Harvey

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
  • Elevate
  • Respect: -83
    • MSN Messenger - Harvey@ChannelHQ.com
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2012, 11:59:36 pm »
-2
Just find a vertec dude.
RVJ: 32", only 18" to go!
RVJ: 35", only 15" to go!

TKXII

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1255
  • Respect: -12
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2012, 10:26:47 pm »
0
yeah probably.

I say so because today, I came across a jump mat. Without warming up (was mentally prepared and very recovere), I pulled a 31 in my dresspants and formal wear, tie.

It was very accurate and convinved me this stuff is good, because I know frm measuring rims with measuring tape for a whiel that I've been at 31-32 for a while. But that jumpmat is not the same as the one you're using but probably works ismilarly.

"Performance during stretch-shortening cycle exercise is influenced by the visco-elastic properties of the muscle-tendon units. During stretching of an activated muscle, mechanical energy is absorbed in the tendon structures (tendon and aponeurosis) and this energy can subsequently be re-utilized if shortening of the muscle immediately follows the stretching. According to Biscotti (2000), 72% of the elastic energy restitution action comes from tendons, 28% - from contractile elements of muscles.

http://www.verkhoshansky.com/Portals/0/Presentations/Shock%20Method%20Plyometrics.pdf

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2012, 11:12:28 pm »
+1
i had a jump mat, it was pretty accurate.. maybe 1" off on avg.. landing knees real bent, 2-3" off.. but as long you're landing stiff, it will be a pretty good measure.

vertec isn't necessarily any better than jump mat, i mean some people or some jumps, your timing may be off/arm slightly further away than optimal which could lead to lower measures.. the only good thing is it doesn't really over-inflated vert unless you cheat your reach..

timing/form can definitely be an issue with each jump.

nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2012, 01:53:26 am »
0
yea i think its pretty close.

my max standing reach arm completely outstretched in shoes is 7 ft 10

TKXII

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1255
  • Respect: -12
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: is my 36.9 standing vert legit ??
« Reply #14 on: June 06, 2012, 09:51:54 am »
0
Wow you were in Kelly Baggett's latest article! http://www.higher-faster-sports.com/HowMuchCanVertBeImproved.html

Didn't know you were working with him.

Anyway after reading that, I was thinking that you (Ori) still haven't had all the improvement possible on movement efficiency. Your run up looks different than what most high leapers do. ANd your penultimate looks really small. I don't know if the large penultimate is the way for everyone, but certainly yours is smaller than I'd expect for a 40+ jumper and furthermore, your depth is pretty high during your RVJ in your dunk vid. Baggett didn't mention that though so I was a bit confused I guess. And I'm sure you've already thought about this.

What do you think?

edit: not all great leapers have a deep depth during their RVJ, but most do. Maybe you have more FT fibers so you take a shorter stepped more reactive run up
« Last Edit: June 06, 2012, 09:53:59 am by Avishek »
"Performance during stretch-shortening cycle exercise is influenced by the visco-elastic properties of the muscle-tendon units. During stretching of an activated muscle, mechanical energy is absorbed in the tendon structures (tendon and aponeurosis) and this energy can subsequently be re-utilized if shortening of the muscle immediately follows the stretching. According to Biscotti (2000), 72% of the elastic energy restitution action comes from tendons, 28% - from contractile elements of muscles.

http://www.verkhoshansky.com/Portals/0/Presentations/Shock%20Method%20Plyometrics.pdf