16126
Basketball / Re: Gray McNeeley
« on: April 18, 2011, 01:41:34 am »
he bugs me, never answers any of my questions.
he had some nice dunk vids/training vids though.
he had some nice dunk vids/training vids though.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Great jumps adarq... ur really making progress breh.
question - What do you think about rack pulls? they are like the equivalent of the half squat for the deadlift.
did you grow shorter or something?
srsly, I swear last two sets of stills had your feet WAY off the ground, but when you looked at arm/rim difference, its normal
![]()
That's very interesting. Could this unracking thing make you become more aware of the hips if that makes sense? (like the iso stim does).
You not using this ISO stim exercise any more Andrew?.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWnDOmi0Gvc













Last jump looks like a one-leg dunk attempt. You owe me a one legged dunk if you get under 150.
17 April 2011
ME jumps/dunks session
9'10'' rim , concrete
Bodyweight@session : ~196 , nice
Injuries/aches : none
Soreness : none
Stim : 3 teaspoons coffee + 1 redbull
- 10mins dynamic warmup
- bunch of low mid effort jumps
- SVJ : ~6'' above rim, ~29''. PR tie
- Dropstep : ~9'' above rim , ~32'' ( 0.5'' below PR )
- 1/2 steps DLRVJ : 11'' to 12'' above rim , ~34''-35''. Not sure , maybe, see pic below.
- 30 dunk attempts, sth like 7x4-5:
Some hard dunks there , definitely best 9'10'' dunk session ever.
Here is the best jump of the session:
3'' below wrist = 11'' above rim = 34''
4'' below wrist = 12'' above rim = 35''
Don't know what to claim , let's call it a 34,5'' PR tie?



idk. My bad i meant like how big it is. Like the size of muscle like the size 13 inch compared to 16 inch same length
does calf size really matter. Like if you have a short calf.
Yeah I think people need to find the proper variation to it in terms of time. I mean think about it - if you do 5s unracks that can't possibly "hurt" you (other than maybe if you get injured by using too much weight or something) but what I mean by hurt is having a negative influence on power/strength production. For such a small time window, it's gotta have only a stim effect for the CNS (like "hey, I just got fatter by 400 lbs, how about you give me some extra power to be able to survive" kind of effect).
If you do it often (that's to be discovered, what "often" should mean for anybody) over and over and over in time, then the CNS should be able to "accept" and "consider normal" such a level of sudden electrical output in the body. It's like a depth jump basically (but obviously different in terms of signal speed and amount of time that signal is maintained) but at the other part of the spectrum.
For a depth jump and especially depth drop where you hold the landing, there is a strong signal for a short time, but you have to take into account the shock on the joints/bones etc that's going to be detrimental to health over time.
For an unrack, there is a strong but weaker signal than in a depth drop (but still stronger than what you usually get in your normal life or even strength training) that lasts longer than in a depth drop. Sure, you have to take into account spinal load over time in here as well in terms of health, that's why I said you need to be smart and patient using this.
But, again, if you make the CNS adapt and be able to generate this signal "naturally" as in "at any point in time" then it might help getting the "normal" signal threshold that occurs during lifting and jumping at a higher point than if you were not to use this "system" of high frequency unracking.
Sometimes on tough squatting days I do this unrack thing and it helps.
Also, I always make my final warm up set heavier than my work set. If I'm doing sets of 8, then my final two warm up sets are heavier. The added weight definitely makes the bar feel lighter, thus giving me confidence, but also the fact that I'm repping them (only singles) primes me for the movement as well.
Sometimes, when it's really tough, I'll do something like this:
135x5
185x5
225x3
275x1
315x1
365x1
385x10sec unrack
345x5
345x5
345x5
But I've never thought of the idea of "high frequency unracking." I've only ever thought of it as a way to prime you right before your tough work set.
What's weird though, is how when I do a single at 355 or 365 it feels SOOOO heavy on my back, I cannot possibly imagine how I ever squatted 415. I feel like after a certain point, the feeling of heaviness on your back reaches a threshhold and it doesn't feel that much heaver. 275-->315, not much difference. 315-->365, huge difference in feeling. 365-->405, not much again.
yo adarq!! i'm new here and first wanna say how awesome this site is.
second i just want to ask you what the craziest results on vert/speed you've ever heard of are (real ones, not bullshit 14 inches in 1 month squatflex shit)
and what you think can be realistic for approximately 8 weeks in the summer of hard weight training, sled pushing, good sleep/nutrition, etc. peace.