Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dreyth

Pages: 1 ... 127 128 [129] 130
1921
Peer Reviewed Studies Discussion / Re: Vertical Jump
« on: February 02, 2011, 12:53:10 pm »
for example, say you squat 2xBW in 2s, well, if you become squat-obsessed and end up squatting 2.5xBW in 5-6 seconds, those gains in maximal strength past 2x probably won't transfer well to explosive movements

Agreed. However, consider this possibility:

Athlete A:

Squats 2.0xbw in 2s

Three months later

Squats 2.5xbw in 4s
Squats 2.0xbw in 1.75s

I think going from a 2xbw squat to a 2.5xbw squat is more effective in increasing the amount of time it takes to squat 2xbw (in terms of how long the rep takes) versus incorporating RFD work and not increasing to a 2.5xbw squat.
Not only that, but the RFD work may fade away over time once you switch to more strength oriented work, and you wouldn't be able to keep up with that 2xbw squatting speed.

I prefer strength work over RFD work pretty much all the time. Plyos, on the other hand, are a bit of a different story imo (yes I know they increase RFD as well).



1922
Article & Video Discussion / Re: Spot reduction may actually be possible?
« on: February 02, 2011, 12:44:26 pm »
Why not? I'm definitely a skeptic but I'm looking for faults in the article.  BUT PLEASE READ:

Spot reduction is definitely not possible in the way that we think it is (ONLY losing fat in ONE area), but what the author is saying is that we may have stubborn areas due to some certain causes, and if we help do away with some of those causes, those stubborn areas wont be stubborn... they'll just be like most other areas. regular. Which means at THAT point, the body will actually be closer to losing fat more evenly over different parts.

He's not saying that we can actually lose more fat in a "stubborn area" than any other area, he's saying that maybe we can get the level of fat loss in a "stubborn area" closer to the level that it occurs in the rest of the body, therefore allowing for a more even distribution of fat loss.

Don't get it wrong, "spot reduction" is just in the title (of this post and the article as well) just to grab attention. Please understand the philosophy.

1923
Article & Video Discussion / Spot reduction may actually be possible?
« on: February 02, 2011, 12:33:49 pm »
http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/spot_reduction_is_real_heres_how_to_do_it

I trust this article a bit more than the others because there's no product placement in it. Read up, sounds interesting and plausible.

1924
Pics, Videos, & Links / Squat 335x3
« on: January 26, 2011, 12:42:23 pm »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEAQIRL-aVI (unrack at :22)

The first set of 10x3 from smolov jr. 335 was my max before i started. I also recorded the last set, but the memory on the camera ran out and cut off the second two reps so I'm not uploading that.

I'll be sure to try recording a 335x5 and a 375 1RM later this week and early next week.

1925
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: January 24, 2011, 07:41:48 pm »
I used to love t-nation for their NO BULLSHIT attitude in their articles and it was a great source of information for putting on muscle. However, I can't stand how everyone there thinks if you're less than 200lbs at 6'0 YOU'RE A PUSSY. And that you need to gain more weight... for what? I asked a question about why the hell my left pec is so much bigger than my right and posted a pic, and the first comment I got was "go eat 5 steaks a day for a year and come back."

And it's not just the forum anymore, but I can't stand their whole Biotest bullshit, they market that thing like crazy. Like they find out some important breakthrough shit about nutrition and hey, whaddya know, this biotest product has had exactly that for 2 years now!

And the anaconda protocol? Are you fucking serious?

1926
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: January 24, 2011, 06:49:57 pm »
links to threads please!

1927
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Kingfish
« on: January 19, 2011, 08:12:58 am »
I think within 7 months you can be at a 2.5x bw squat. That's this summer man. Crazy.

1928
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: January 19, 2011, 08:10:26 am »
SLEEP SCHEDULE THE PREVIOUS NIGHT
01/11/2011: 6 hours (6:30am to 12:30pm)
01/12/2011: 9 hours sleep
01/13/2011: 9 hours sleep
01/14/2011: 8 hours sleep
01/15/2011: 10 hours sleep
01/16/2011: 9 hours sleep
01/17/2011: 8 hours sleep
01/18/2011: 8 hours sleep

Oh how I envy you... I average 5-6hrs sleep a night for about 3 years in a row now. Including summer vacation.

1929
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: January 18, 2011, 09:42:23 pm »
HAHAHA "if you want nudes."

1930
MUSiC anD SHeeT! / Re: I wish trance music was still like this
« on: January 17, 2011, 02:42:03 pm »
Blank and Jones! I remember them back in the day... I was like 10 years old when they were popular. I was probably the ONLY kid in my school who knew them because I lived in NYC so everyone was listening to nsync, backstreet boys and other gay shit.

And this makes me happy, a new trance track with a 2002 feel:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS8ZupLEvAs

1931
MUSiC anD SHeeT! / Re: I wish trance music was still like this
« on: January 08, 2011, 09:51:37 pm »
same song again http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1TkqoKIsDk

rank 1 - airwave (original mix)

1932
MUSiC anD SHeeT! / I wish trance music was still like this
« on: January 08, 2011, 09:50:46 pm »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP206h8JgQA#t=54s

Man I'd give anything for it to be 1997 right now and watch trance rise in popularity from the underground scene... WITH UNDERGROUND TRANCE, not popular mainstream trance!

1933
Article & Video Discussion / Re: jumpusa
« on: January 06, 2011, 09:58:28 pm »
Well in pretty much any kind of unilateral lowerbody movement you aren't truly using 0% of the non-trained leg... your other leg pushes off on the step up, stabalizes and even pushes a little on a lunge and bulgarian split squat... etc

But about the leg press, that does seem to isolate one leg. Can anyone find any reason why your legs will push more independently? What's the science behind that? The only thing I can think of is that maybe your leg is better positioned for producing/transferring force in the position you're in during a unilateral lift. Also, I forgot where, but I read a study where they proved that the "greater neural whatever" is not higher in a unilateral movement than bilateral. To clarify, it's not true that your right leg has more neural activity during a one legged squat on the right leg verses a two legged squat, even though you're more focused on that leg.

1934
Program Review / Re: Jump Manual
« on: December 31, 2010, 08:22:17 am »
I have never heard anyone bash him, ever.

he sucks

care to elaborate

he sucks ass


hahhaha man this is the funniest shit i've seen in a while. it's even funnier if you read all the posts one by one from the beginning.

yes, i quoted the first page.

1935
Nutrition & Supplementation / Re: Protein powder
« on: December 12, 2010, 12:24:01 pm »
Sorry to revive an old thread, but what do you guys think about BuyBulkWhey.com?

Pages: 1 ... 127 128 [129] 130