Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Raptor

Pages: 1 ... 131 132 [133] 134 135 ... 499
1981
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Kingfush
« on: March 22, 2014, 02:54:13 pm »
how does your svj compare @ 365/405 vs 455+?

Yeah it would be very interesting to know

1982
What about these:

http://www.eastbay.com/product/model:209161/sku:35578600/nike-kobe-venomenon-mens/red/maroon/?cm=kobeshoes_search_redesign

I can't find Kobe 8s on eastbay... only these ^^^

There is only one entry of Kobe 8 and if you click on it it redirects you to the main eastbay.com page.

1983
I only wear low tops. I want my ankle to have all the freedom in the world. I don't want all these forces breaking up at the knee because of the restricted ankle.

And yeah, I have Kobe 6 but they have completely worn out... I even did a craddle dunk off one in them at 9'8. But I have NEW Kobe 7s which suck SOOOOOOOO bad... and some other very old shoes like the Nike VC 5 and Nike Uptempo and crap like that. Useless for proper movement on the court.

When I wear these shoes I feel my feet are completely disconnected from the floor and I can barely move at all.

1984
Any ideas of good RESPONSIVE basketball shoes? With a non-rigid sole, closer to running shoes?

1985
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJDiDZ-5w40" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJDiDZ-5w40</a>

1986
Well you can have the strongest hips and quads in the world, if the calves give out and the tibia collapses forward when you apply all that upperleg power into the ground, you're going to lose all that power and furthermore, that power will be translated into your knees since they are collapsing forward.

1988
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: March 20, 2014, 07:32:19 am »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4GTFWrXPcc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4GTFWrXPcc</a>

1989
In my opinion, it definitely will. Doing all that running will make you reactive, meaning - you'll be better at controlling your bodyweight and you'll have better eccentric control and return.

1990
Article & Video Discussion / Re: The low bar squat is not an exercise
« on: March 19, 2014, 10:21:23 am »
Well I see your point, and was expecting it... but again - even with me improving low bar squat 1RM by 20 kg or so... my high bar squat 1RM has remained at a the same grinding 140 kg if I'm lucky. And I feel like whenever I jump, off one leg or two legs, the amount of tension I get in those jumps at the knee level is the same tension I feel when I do high bar squats - they seem so specifically "connected" to each other. Oh, and it's the same tension or OVERLOAD should I say that I feel when I do half squats.

It's like I want to express the posterior chain strength that I have but I can't, because once that power reaches the knee level the quads can't stop it from going forward and collapsing. Combine that with my heavy bodyweight and calf weakness (as of late) - and you get useless posterior chain because it's like pushing in sand - the quads and calves give out and you lose all your "potential" power that the posterior chain is able to generate.

It's like pushing a ton of power on a pole in a pole vault but the pole is very weak at the middle and bends like crazy with no return of force... basically no stiffness whatsoever.

So despite the video that you put - I don't feel like my quads are doing substantial work out there at all - I just sink and control the descent in that squat using my glutes and hamstrings, where the quads are just pretty much isometrically "kinda" contracting.

I know how that sounds but that's what I feel. Can't describe it otherwise.

Again, to sum it up - the same overload I feel in the plant of a jump, regardless of technique, is the same overload I feel when I high bar squat. If I could work it out with the slower movement, which is the high bar squat - to make myself used to control that collapse that wants to happen - then that should translate into the jumps as well.

In the past I thought that maybe I'm just too quad dominant and training with the high bar squat is something that will make me even MORE quad dominant, and that the low bar squat would make sense in that situation - but now I'm starting to think otherwise.

If you look at any great two foot jumper - they all have their knees go way past the toes and the quad contribution in their jumps is tremendous. It doesn't mean I should be the same, but what it does mean is that I shouldn't have a problem getting in that position without collapsing. If I do, like I do now, then I just have sucky quads and they need to be improved.

1991
Basketball / Re: A WHOLE BUNCH OF DUNKS AND SHIT.
« on: March 19, 2014, 10:10:03 am »
gerald green: better dunker than VC in his prime?

It depends what you mean by "better dunker".

I think possibly higher jumper (although Vince never really did try to MAXIMALLY jump to the best of my knowledge... never seen him in that position where I thought "that was his maximum jump").

Maybe here:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHEQQ-KDqlc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHEQQ-KDqlc</a>

But otherwise, Vince has better power, better body control and is just more creative/looks cooler. But the main thing is the difference in actual power in the dunks.

1992
You can just look at this as a learning experience, no need to stress too much about it.

1993
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: March 19, 2014, 06:15:35 am »
Wait... could you guys repeat the whole intensity-volume debate? I don't understand exactly what you mean.

1994
Article & Video Discussion / Re: The low bar squat is not an exercise
« on: March 19, 2014, 06:13:40 am »
I know what Lance said but I disagree. If that was the case, then two different squat styles would not even exist and the difference in poundages between the high and the low bar squat wouldn't exist either.

The thing with the low bar squat is it really depends MUCH more on the posterior chain, and the tibias travel far less forward (and thus requires much less ankle dorsiflexion to be available) and thus the quads get a much less loading effect.

Which is bad if that's the only thing you do for the quads.

If you were able to front squat and also do low bar squats, maybe it would make sense. But for someone in my position who can't do front squats, then a high bar squat makes more sense in my opinion.

1995
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: March 19, 2014, 06:10:28 am »
I've had a friend who was 6'7 and could dunk, he could even dunk a 5 kg medicine ball at 10'2 (3.10m) off SVJ... but off a running jump, of any kind, he would suck so badly.

And no matter what I tried to do with him he was always like this.

Pages: 1 ... 131 132 [133] 134 135 ... 499