Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Raptor

Pages: 1 ... 236 237 [238] 239 240 ... 500
3556
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Kingfush
« on: December 25, 2012, 04:59:20 am »
You shouldn't go that high. The calves aren't really fast twitch to begin with (although the only hypertrophy in muscles in general is fast twitch to begin with) but you should go 8-12 reps with the calves. Keeps you safe and helps with both hypertrophy and strength.

I go as low as 8 reps personally with calf raises (bilaterally) and it works pretty well. No need to risk that much just for the sake of using 214324 tons.

You could also go eccentric one leg / concentric two legs. Also a lower weight.

3557
If you're a guy who's thinking long-term, continue strength training dispite being fat and think to the future.

IMO even in that long term scenario ( bulk till you cant gain more strength , then cut ) he would have much better success if he first cut down to at least 15%, so the bulk would be better ( more LBM , less fat ). Bodyfat is not just extra weight, it affects food partitioning heavily.

+1.

The other thing is, suppose you bulk starting from 17-20%. Then when you're done bulking and you top out somewhere between say 20-30% you have a very very long cut ahead of you. It's hard to maintain motivation, strength, muscle and discipline for THAT long when you've got 6-8 months of dieting ahead of you. You might gain extra strength by fat bulking past 15% but can you keep those gains in the face of a long cut? Probably not. Better to keep your cuts short (3 months max) which means keeping your end-of-bulk bodyfat around 15% and then you have a better chance of keeping your gains post bulk.

Completely agree.

3558
Should i continue full squats and do some half/qtr squats? 
Yes. Squat, whether it's full, half, front, BSS or whatever you like and you're good at.

Quote
and should i worry about the body fat ~25% after i get stronger.  my current full squat is 310. 
Yes.

Best thing anyone can do for their athleticism is to reduce their bodyfat down to their essential bodyfat (thanks t0dday). Which means ~10% bodyfat. Most people have no idea how much weight they'd actually need to lose to get down to a legit 10%. Especially for those over 15%, they're probably underestimating big time. If you're 25% then you're too heavy to be athletic and that would be a priority for you if you care about athleticism. I'd even say that  dialing in your kitchen game is going to do more for your athleticism than anything you do in the gym.


Yup^^^

Also it depends on what kind of "jumping guy" you are. If you want immediate results, start cutting now and trying to maintain strength. Once you get to 10-12% bodyfat start getting stronger again. You should see your vert going up. If you're a guy who's thinking long-term, continue strength training dispite being fat and think to the future.

If I remember right Kelly was saying it's better to cut now and THEN start gaining strength if you're a fatass. That makes it safer to use plyos as well.

By the way - you're going to improve plyometrically cutting fat but make sure you get your calves stronger in the meantime.

3559
Here is my advice... spend $80 on them, and then when you get them, take a pair of scissors and cut them up and make yourself a nice deadlifting glove.

Creative! +1

3560
Basketball / Re: A WHOLE BUNCH OF DUNKS AND SHIT.
« on: December 23, 2012, 12:43:23 pm »
That's because he ended up squatting 410 by doing ab workouts.

3561
Hip thrust and RDL eh? Good to see.

3562
Meh... try doing barbell calf raises... there will be some balance issues but if I can manage them, you can too.

3563
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: December 21, 2012, 10:27:38 am »
I'd really freak out if I saw Jesus dunking.

3564
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: December 21, 2012, 08:29:10 am »
Being light helps eh?

3565
Well consecutive ankle bounces, and anything that is consecutive and quick (2-leg bounds, 1-leg bounds, hurdle jumps, depth jumps, quick depth jumps etc) is a good indicator of "bounciness" or "good feet".

In terms of the glutes it's more of a structural thing I guess, where they are excited better with a drop-step plant vs. a SVJ plant due to better leverage.

3566
325x5 is pretty good... you need to keep that up. When is the last time you've hit your calves with a huge volume (for example, my volume for the calf day is around 30,000 lbs)?

3567
When people talk about reactivity they should in reality talk about good or bad calf strength and good or bad glute strength.

Someone with bad calf strength will not be reactive. Someone with bad glute strength will not be reactive. Someone with huge quad dominance will not be reactive. Then obviously it's also a matter of structure (where even if the guy is weak, the alignment of his limbs does or does not overload certain weak areas).

3568
Bios / Re: Animals
« on: December 20, 2012, 05:00:44 am »
Quote
Both the eagle and the kid were created in 3D animation and integrated in to the film afterwards.

Then it makes sense.

3569
Basketball / Re: kobe's a beast
« on: December 20, 2012, 04:20:16 am »
atg or gtfo

Tell that to adarqui. Or to a 6'7 guy.

3570
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: December 20, 2012, 04:18:55 am »
aite so how about this, once ive got 6x60 for both legs, i keep the stronger leg on 60 while progressing the weaker leg to say 70. Then progress them both from there at the same rate

 :derp:

No. You use the same weight for both legs, with the weak leg first. This way the weak leg gets to his maximum number of repetitions while the strong leg gets "some" training effect since it still does work but it doesn't go to failure like the weak leg does.

thinking out aloud .. what is the bss? it's a kind of unilateral exercise but not really since it's not a true single leg exercise that is kind of a squat but not really because it's not below parallel. so for it to be an effective leg exercise you kind of need to be lifting a weight >> 1/2*FS_max. Why? because being a partial squat, by giving up depth we use more weight. and by giving up true unilateralism we can use more weight than 1/2 the bilateral weight. so i should be looking at building up to say 100x6 on BSS to get something out of the exercise. hows my logik?

You think too much... you shouldn't worry about correlating exercises. You shouldn't think "If I front squat 100 kg does that mean that I can do the same work back squatting 120 kg or BSS-ing with 50 kg dumbbells?"

Too many parameters to correlate these exercises. You just need to worry about improving whatever lift you're aiming to improve. If you're improving then you're getting closer to your objective of improving athleticism.

Pages: 1 ... 236 237 [238] 239 240 ... 500