Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LBSS

Pages: 1 ... 268 269 [270] 271 272 ... 677
4037
had to go to richmond yesterday at the last minute -- family business -- so could not make it to the gym. got back this afternoon.

WEIGHT: 189.2 (173.0)
SORENESS: none
ACHES/INJURIES: right knee a little, on a couple of jumps
MENTAL STATE: low motivation, otherwise fine

- warm up

Jumps:

- skater jump x 20

- one-step RVJ x 10

- DLRVJ x 5,5,5,5,5
knee bugging a little when form go away from me. if i lead with the left and don't collapse over my right foot i'm okay. as soon as my right knee starts traveling forward on the plant i'm screwed.

- bound-bound-jump x 3,3,3,3,3

Strength:

- paused speed squat 275 x 5,5
challenging but solid, getting close to the heaviest weights i ever did paused so that's good

- deficit DL 315 x 5
low back announcing itself, decided against second set. used straps.

- hip thrust 315 x 15,15

- DB push press 55s x 10,7

- pull up x 1,2,3,4,3,2,1

- decline sit up x 10,10,10
no BB, low back was feeling it a bit so played it cautious

- stretch

ended up being a good workout.

LATER IN THE EVENING

Daily routine. Knees started bothering me a little but not too bad.

4038
LAST NIGHT

Right knee bugging too much to do pistols, shrimp squats, or jumps. Did the open-chain and ab stuff and doubled the volume.

TONIGHT

Daily routine. Right knee not 100% by any means but was able to do all the exercises. First set of pistols with right I did concentric-only, second set felt better.

4039
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Dreyth's New Journal
« on: March 04, 2016, 11:12:01 am »
for bench: more volume.

4040
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: chasing athleticism
« on: March 04, 2016, 11:10:36 am »
my envy, it knows no bounds. two-handed tomahawk off a couple of steps.

4041
dunno just seems like using partial variants as the main focus is suboptimal. why not do full lifts?

4042
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:35:18 am »
cherry-picking one study -- one that admits its own weakness, no less! -- to make dietary decisions for yourself is idiotic, and to make dietary decisions for others is even more idiotic.

4043
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: March 03, 2016, 10:26:59 am »
Stop with all the dairy brah. I used consume a shit ton of it as well, until I was made aware of studies like this (100,000 people sample size):
http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g6015

"A high intake of milk might, however, have undesirable effects, because milk is the main dietary source of D-galactose. Experimental evidence in several animal species indicates that chronic exposure to D-galactose is deleterious to health and the addition of D-galactose by injections or in the diet is an established animal model of aging. Even a low dose of D-galactose induces changes that resemble natural aging in animals, including shortened life span caused by oxidative stress damage, chronic inflammation, neurodegeneration, decreased immune response, and gene transcriptional changes. A subcutaneous dose of 100 mg/kg D-galactose accelerates senescence (aging) in mice. This is equivalent to 6-10 g in humans, corresponding to 1-2 glasses of milk..."

so?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26378576

Quote
Results from epidemiological studies of milk consumption and mortality are inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies assessing the association of non-fermented and fermented milk consumption with mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. PubMed was searched until August 2015. A two-stage, random-effects, dose-response meta-analysis was used to combine study-specific results. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed with the I² statistic. During follow-up periods ranging from 4.1 to 25 years, 70,743 deaths occurred among 367,505 participants. The range of non-fermented and fermented milk consumption and the shape of the associations between milk consumption and mortality differed considerably between studies. There was substantial heterogeneity among studies of non-fermented milk consumption in relation to mortality from all causes (12 studies; I² = 94%), cardiovascular disease (five studies; I² = 93%), and cancer (four studies; I² = 75%) as well as among studies of fermented milk consumption and all-cause mortality (seven studies; I² = 88%). Thus, estimating pooled hazard ratios was not appropriate. Heterogeneity among studies was observed in most subgroups defined by sex, country, and study quality. In conclusion, we observed no consistent association between milk consumption and all-cause or cause-specific mortality.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25327185

Quote
CONCLUSIONS:
Drinking milk at least 1-2 times a month was associated with lower all-cause mortality in men compared to never drinking milk. An inverse association was also found between drinking milk and mortality from both cardiovascular diseases and cancer. However, lower all-cause mortality in women was found only in those who drank milk 3-4 times/week.

4044
nah it's not below my kneecap. more above and behind, so maybe quad tendon? going vestless today to give knees a rest.

also, a post in coges's journal made me think of something. i've started training my mom and dad once a week. it's been really fascinating working with both of them, and it's rekindled my interest in training and PT in a way that hasn't been true for a few years. everyone on here is a young man with at least a little bit of training under his belt. some are stronger or faster than others, of course, but in general we're a fairly homogeneous group. i love following the journals, chipping in with my $0.02 when i feel like i have something to contribute, etc. but i haven't had the fire to go out and read a bunch of new stuff and try to learn in a while.

my mom is weak and immobile by comparison. that is not a surprise, of course. she's a 61-year-old woman. but the degree to which i'm stronger, more mobile, and better balanced than she is is eye-opening. apart from just not being very muscular, her muscles don't fire right. she is, for lack of a better word, disorganized when it comes to movements in the gym. she is a good athlete -- three-sport varsity in high school, swam across the chesapeake bay to celebrate her 50th birthday, does sprint triathlons -- so she learns pretty quickly. but she has a hard time making her glutes fire, for example, or hinging at her hips for an RDL. her thoracic spine and shoulders are very stiff and her posture is poor.

initially i wanted her to be doing a lot of unilateral leg stuff because balance is a priority. but given her difficulty with SL RDLs, i've decided that she needs to spend some dedicated time just working on activation. prone leg raises and glute kickbacks, and x-band walks. lunges, which she can do well enough now. bent-knee hollow position leg raises. and a lot of very gentle shoulder and t-spine mobility work, and band pull-aparts.

so coges, what i'm saying is you have the same problem as my mother and should do more activation stuff for your ass.  :-*

4045
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: FP's log
« on: March 03, 2016, 09:23:33 am »
you have a lot of hamstring issues and there is some good evidence for the preventative benefits of assisted natural GHRs. can you integrate them into your lifting? start with a couple of sets of 8 after you squat, for example.

4046
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Kingfush
« on: March 03, 2016, 09:21:17 am »
preach.

4047
It makes logical sense, yeah. I'm just not sure it makes training sense. But then again I am not an expert, so do your thing.  :-*

4048
YESTERDAY: 3/1/16

Daily routine. Not gonna log, same thing every time. Did the whole thing.

TODAY

WEIGHT: 187.8 (171.8)
SORENESS: none
ACHES/INJURIES: knees as soon as i started jumping
MENTAL STATE: good

Daily routine.

Then:

- MB OH throws x 5

- skater jumps x 20,20

- DLRVJ x 5,5,(5,5)
knees really bothering me after the second set, especially right. took vest off and toughed out two more sets but  form was deteriorating and height with it. bagged rest of workout. fuck.

 >:(

4049
sorry meant to respond the other day. if part of the goal is to compete, why are you (1) not doing full lifts as opposed to power and (2) only doing each lift once per week (well, power cleans twice but jerks only once).

4050
also, PR: got 25% raise today. retroactive to october. next paycheck is gonna be more money than i've ever gotten at once in my whole life.

sick  :headbang:

also, PR: got 25% raise today. retroactive to october. next paycheck is gonna be more money than i've ever gotten at once in my whole life.

that is awesome. never heard of a retroactive raise before! Also that's a large % raise  :headbang:

thanks bros! dreyth, i've been doing the job i'm getting the raise for since october, but the new CEO wanted to wait until he'd gotten through this whole organizational restructuring process he's doing before he made adjustments. so the salary bump acknowledges that i really got promoted back then and have been underpaid since. my friend got a 20% bump for the same reason.

Pages: 1 ... 268 269 [270] 271 272 ... 677