Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Raptor

Pages: 1 ... 372 373 [374] 375 376 ... 494
5596
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: Hang Clean Form check please
« on: June 16, 2011, 04:36:42 am »
Trying to focus in what lance is teaching in his video.

Focus in JUMPING with the bar...

and I lift like this today:
 :strong:
http://vimeo.com/25169031

100x better man. good work.

Yeah it's actually looking really good in my opinion, especially as that is a dead hang clean and not a hang clean as far as I'm concerned.

5597
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: June 15, 2011, 06:02:52 pm »
Some of those jumps look 40+ by how high your arm is over the rim, is that 10'?

5598
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: beast
« on: June 15, 2011, 01:47:00 pm »
Randy Culpepper:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u8oNgbtSAo" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u8oNgbtSAo</a>

5599
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NHRD10DmCc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NHRD10DmCc</a>

5600
Very interesting. I'll start using my powerjumper again and see what happens. Will probably limit it's use to low box depth jumps and two-leg bounds and broad jumps, since in a one-leg bound, because one leg is flexed, it won't have any effect (or even worse - make the bound imbalanced).

5601
I started at 27 and have more than doubled my SVJ. Although to be fair I was almost intentionally de-training SVJ type qualities by running long distance (20km plus)  and being weak as fark (no strength training).

When I first read it I was like "oh man, this guy has a 54 inch vert!".

5602
Very unique physical traits? Wait, what?

5603
I don't think there's such a thing as a "typical" improvement, unless typical means "the guy reaches ~2.5x squat", since that's the squat value were more strength usually won't transfer too good to explosiveness. If you take a guy from a 0.7x squat and get him to 1.5x squat and he improves by 6 inches and stops his squat improvement to 1.5x instead of continuing to get it up to ~2.5, then how can you say that that's his near max ceiling of improvement?

So in reality you could say "your limit in terms of strength to SVJ improvement is probably a 2.5x squat" instead of throwing a number of inches or a % of the original SVJ around.

So if a guy has a 2.5x squat and jumps 26 inches, besides that he must be humongously unexplosive (and he should train that), then yes you could say that maybe the structure is very bad for jumping and therefore he doesn't have much ceiling to improvement.

But if you take formerly weak people, regardless of structure, with say a 1x untrained squat and get them to 2.5x, wouldn't you expect them to improve a lot? The only factor at that point becomes if they ARE ABLE to get to that ~2.5x number.

5604
Well those were the true athletes. Oh wait... :ninja:

I had a guy today see me do broad jumps and he was like "hey, what's your best broad jump?". So I said "2.60m". And he was like "mine's 3.60m".

As far as I know, the world record is ~3.50m.

5605
ADARQ & LanceSTS - Q&A / Re: Keeping gains in your vertical jumps
« on: June 13, 2011, 10:54:11 am »
Maybe you're becoming more efficient at utilizing your current strength and then when you back off you lose that efficiency and fall back into using a lower % of your strength to apply in your jumps.

So either increase strength or keep on jumping.

5606
Derails? Boy they have some old trains out there don't they?

i've never even seen a hint of a train track out here or heard anyone talk about trains. same thing with pakistan, which is funny because india is all about trains.

You mean - all about riding ON trains (on the roof of trains).

5607
So far:

Squat: 132 lbs x 5 to 435 lbs x 5
SVJ: ~27" to 36"

I got mine from ~20 inches to 30 while taking my squat from 80kgx5 (90 1RM) at 67 kg bodyweight to 120kgx5 (135 1RM) at 82 kg bodyweight. So as you can see that's a 10 inch increase in SVJ and I'm still under 2x in terms of squatting strength. Once and if I ever get to 2.5x I should have ~38-40.

So it's all a matter of strength, strength application and structure as the most important factors (if we're to ignore the factors I talked about in my previous post). So basically it depends IF you can increase your strength as far as a 2x-2.5x squat to reach your genetic limit more or less.

5608
How much have you increased your squat and SVJ with training? And starting from what squat and what SVJ?

5609
So your argument is that making estimations in life where the dependent variable is influenced by lots of factors is "stupid" and "launching numbers around"?

So I guess then that predicting the weather is stupid, predicting stock values is stupid, predicting demographic development is stupid, analyzing the intellectual potential of a child is stupid, etc.



What, you don't have an answer for what I said and you came up with this? :ninja:

GETTING BACK TO SQUATTING AND SVJ, what I said holds true. If anything, it's probably easier to increase the SVJ than it is to increase the running VJ if your RVJ technique is already at a high level for your particular structure because the SVJ responds better to strength work and strength is a more alterable quality than reactive stuff.

5610
I don't think there is a model. The only model I can see is that the closer you are to an elite value the harder it will be to improve (just like in anything else in life).

So if you have a 20 inch SVJ it would be easier than if you'd have a 35 inch SVJ. BUT - again - there are so many factors that govern this... if the athlete has sports experience, if the athlete lifted before, his structure, his CNS, his sleep, his nutrition, his endocrine system and so on and so forth.

Therefore I think it's stupid to launch numbers around. I can't understand why one would be limited in his training until he gets to a really good squat number to begin with. And even then he might get a higher VJ by reducing bodyfat or improving his explosiveness or even traditional "plyo" power (even though we talk about SVJ here).

In the end you're going only to be limited by your structure and some CNS characteristics in your SVJ, if you take care of all the other factors. The problem is - very few people do all this.

Pages: 1 ... 372 373 [374] 375 376 ... 494