586
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Kingfush
« on: August 14, 2017, 06:09:23 am »
^ and theres totally nothing wrong with that. makes the heavy compound lift more impressive than it really is.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Kingfish i think u r boss of site. All my squat i have try to replicate urs.
I also think u could eventually hit 315 405 455. have u thought about doing reverse flys and chest supported rows eventually to hit the upper back. Thatd be beast mode since u already have beast mid back
Hey King, I don't want to clog up your journal so I'll delete this soon, but what would you do if you were in my situation;
Obviously I'm working a bit against age as I'm not a young pup anymore. I was really massaging and releasing tension in outer thigh of quads and might have over massaged by smashing a kettlebell against it, but this was like 2 weeks ago. It has been very tender ever since and I feel it a lot of times on squats esp front squats.
Should I take a break from squatting? Thanks!
315 x 5 daily is some nice tonnage.
I worked out back religiously beginning of the year. The chest supported pulls adds some crazy thickness, and also the DB rows are nice, i like them better than pendlay rows bc of ROM.
315 5x4 Nice that's some sick volume to add to your already steady routine![]()
What do you think about alternating 2/3 squats with full squats on the same set, in an effort to train our body/mind not to rely so much on the comfort of stopping with ease at the bottom.
So for example, I would do full pause, followed by 2/3 squat, followed by full pause, followed by 2/3; on a 4 rep set. Obviously on full squats we don't want to just free fall to the bottom.
I think this may help that struggle that full squats have on a PR attempt right after exploding out then where the back has to sort of take over.
225 x 10 seems a bit light for you to use to build your legs. How come you don't go heavier like 275 x 8, or at least go 225 x 15 or 20 to build legs for that 455 x 1
huge back is huge.
cardio walking ftw. underrated & effective. you don't seem to put in alot of volume with your walks, but I guess with that much muscle mass you don't necessarily need to. I wonder what would happen if your cardio/walk sessions were an hour each time. You'd probably just get ridiculously shredded. The thing I love about cardio/walking is it's not taxing at all, to me at least. So you can burn mostly fat kcal and feel very fresh.
I can walk for ~3 hours and barely lose anything, mostly lots of water weight because of my long sleeve shirt. It does add up though and the fat lbs always drop off if I stay consistent with it. I think I get leaner doing long walks than I do with long runs .. Long runs just make me want to eat everything in sight.




King, I have a few questions: 1) Any chance that parallel squats maybe more beneficial (to speed/vertical) than full paused squats? 2) Do you think incorporating interval cardio (such as a slow pace pickup bball game) in my routine once in awhile can help lose fat yet not be detrimental to my squat progression?