What I meant by Lance's method was to choose a weight (say 100 kg) and start doing reps with that, for 3 sets, as many as I can with good form and good bar speed.
So I could get 100x9, 100x7, 100x5. Once I get a total set1+set2+set3 of 20+ I can increase the weight. If I keep the rest periods low, then the body can't help but reach for maximal MU recruitment, since it's needed because the other motor units that you use regularly are fatigued so the body needs to taper into the reserves to get the job done.
I'm basing this on his recent article on myoreps, like here:
For example:
Quote:
I've implemented a fatigue-stop method akin to Mike T in his RTS system (he uses a % table) where you use RPE and rep speed to determine how to continue the set. So for example:
10 reps (activation) + 10sec rest, 3 reps + 10 sec rest, 3 reps (third rep slow and grindy) this is Fatigue Stop 1 (FS1)
now... + 20sec rest, 2 reps (so - longer rest and less reps) + 20sec rest, 2 reps etc until 2nd rep slow and grindy - you've reached Fatigue Stop 2 (FS2) so STOP.
At heavier loads, you switch to lighter loads at FS1, as mentioned.
This will auto-regulate your volume, moreso limiting it when your recuperative abilities are limited as I do not recommend going beyond a pre-determined volume by more than 40-50%.
Heavier loads require fewer reps after the activation set because you are close to maximum fiber recruitment from the first rep. Lighter loads require more reps, because the actual tension per fiber unit is lower, and you must let the load "work" on the muscle longer to compensate. At the same time you must consider that it will be beneficial to get more recovery early in the training phase so that you'll be able to push heavy in the end, so you should aim to keep the number of reps after the activation set pretty much in the same area throughout the whole training phase.
What's your opinion on this kind of training at my current level adarqui and Lance? I'm not trying to overcomplicate or anything, I really am not, but this could work well if I really have good untapped strength (especially explosive) potential like I believe I do.
Should I go with myoreps or should I stick to a more fundamental approach. If I go with fundamental, what's the volume that you think I should start with? Do you think plyo work earlier in the day and then squats 5x5 for 2 days per week is cool enough?
If I do good plyos early in the day and squats later at night (like I do at the moment, at ~21:45 hour, then I'll probably use a small weight (say 100 kg) in my squats workouts if I do such a high volume (5x5 work sets across)). If that's true, then that's a small stimulus. Instead I could go with 3x5x110 for using a heavier weight with less volume.
What would you choose? (I know, there are so many posibilities exposed in here)
1) Plyos + Lance's method
2) Plyos + Myoreps
3) Plyos + 3x5 with a heavier weight (more intense, less volume)
4) Plyos + 5x5 with a lighter weight (less intense, more volume)