Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - adarqui

Pages: 1 ... 478 479 [480] 481 482 ... 1504
7186
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: December 06, 2017, 11:05:38 am »
race night!!

eating good up until ~1 PM or so, warming up around 6:30 PM, race @ 7:15 PM.


12/06/2017

bw = 140
bw before bed last night = 147
soreness = calves barely
aches/injuries = none
cramping = none
morning quad flexibility = loose
morning hamstring flexibility = loose
morning calf flexibility = left tight / right loose
feel = good

wakeup = 9 AM

log:
09:30 AM: food: sautee'd yam in olive oil/pink sea salt, almond milk, sweet green tea
01:00 PM: food: 4 x small pieces of tomato basil mozzarella pizza, 5 chicken wings, black tea
04:00 PM: food: small glass of almond milk, water
06:00 PM: food: some sweet green tea
06:30 PM: workout: warmup + race: 5.03 official ( :personal-record:), 1km estimated = 3.01 :personal-record:, 2nd age group for 30-39
07:30 PM: food: pizza, sprite, gatorade
08:30 PM: workout: 2.5 mile cooldown
09:00 PM: food: mixed nuts, white chocolate covered raisins, coconut water
10:30 PM: food: 4 x chicken wings, coconut water

stretch:
icing:
self massage:
leg drain:
contrast showers:
naps:





workout: warmup + race: 5.03 official ( :personal-record:), 1km estimated = 3.01 :personal-record:, 2nd age group for 30-39
- https://www.strava.com/activities/1305181503
- http://accuchip.racetecresults.com/Results.aspx?CId=16337&RId=193

had alot more in me.. didn't know where the finish was, the race moved up a bit this year. note to self: when I start wondering where the finish line is, it means it's somewhat close, so gun it.. such a moron. it's around a slight bend so you can't really see it come up on you.
































conservative start turned out to be very fast.. which is incredible, because i didn't push it at all and it felt pretty comfortable. adrenaline. I wasn't to far from the lead pack when I clicked my watch for the first lap, but they had a really good jump on me.. being in the 2nd row at the start of this race, is brutal. got boxed in even though we were going fast, and got elbow'd several and all kinds of shit. Next year i'm starting in the first row that's for sure.




Monthly Tracker: 2017

December (12) 2017

TODO:

Bodyweight: [(01,138),(04,139),(05,141),(06,140)]
- FORMAT: (day, weight in lbs)

Total Jumps per leg: []
- FORMAT: (day, # of jumps per leg)
- per leg total:

Max SLRVJ Touch: []
- FORMAT: (day, touch height in ft'inches")
- L-SLRVJ:
- R-SLRVJ:

Total speed interval distance: []
- FORMAT: (day, total speed interval distance in meters)
- total:

Max run speed (mph)/pace (min/mi): [(04,16.3,3:4X?)]
- FORMAT: (day, mph max, pace max in minutes per mile)

Resting HR: []
- FORMAT: (day, minutes for this test, average hr, minimum hr)

PR's: [(04,"alone mile 5:11, alone 1km 3:04")]

Races: [(02,1mile,5:16,5:13)]
- FORMAT: (day, distance, official, watch)

Soreness: [(01,"hamstrings barely, quads barely"),(04,"quads slightly (left moderate), hamstrings slightly (left moderate)"),(05,"calves slightly, quads slightly",(06,"calves barely"))]
- FORMAT: (day, overall soreness, specifics)

Aches/Injuries: [(01,"none"),(04,"none"),(05,"none"),(06,"none")]
- FORMAT: (day, specifics)

Morning Quad Flexibility: [(01,"loose"),(04,"loose"),(05,"loose"),(06,"loose")]
- FORMAT: (day, general flexibility)

Morning Hamstring Flexibility: [(01,"loose"),(04,"loose"),(05,"loose"),(06,"loose")]
- FORMAT: (day, general flexibility)

Morning Calf Flexibility: [(01,"loose"),(04,"loose"),(05,"tight"),(06," left tight / right loose")]
- FORMAT: (day, general flexibility)

Self Massage: []
- FORMAT: (day, area)

Cramping: []
- FORMAT: (day, symptom)

Wakeup: [(01,08:30AM,9),(04,07:00AM,6),(05,07:45AM,6.45),(06,09:00AM,7)]
- FORMAT: (day, wakeup time, hours slept)

7187
800m+ Running and/or Conditioning / Re: The Misc Running News Thread
« on: December 06, 2017, 11:00:10 am »


Quote
Performance of the week: SONDRE MOEN - EUROPEAN MARATHON RECORD
🇳🇴
On Sunday in Japan at the Fukuoka International Marathon, Norway’s Sondre Moen took the tape in 2.05:48 and became the first European to run a 2.05 Marathon.
🇳🇴
Moen’s race win and European Record is our performance of the week.
🇳🇴
Moen has been in fantastic shape in recent months having run a sub 28minute road 10k in September followed by a Norwegian record over Half Marathon in October in Valencia when he ran under the 1hour barrier clocking 59:48.
🇳🇴
He is a favourite of ours at The Kenya Experience as he completes much of his training in Iten, under the tutelage of Renato Canova, so we were delighted to see this breakthrough performance.
🇳🇴
The race on Sunday morning followed the planned 3’00”/km pace throughout the first 30km which was reached right on 3minute average pace. At that point pre race favourite Bedan Karoki of Kenya made a move and increased the pace into the mid 2’50’s. Moen went with him and it ended up being he, rather than the Kenyan who continued to push the pace in the latter stages of the race.
🇳🇴
Running the 29:16 for the 10km from 30-40 was more than enough to do irreparable damage to Karoki, who faded and was passed by Uganda’s 2012 Olympic Champion Stephen Kiprotich and Japan’s Suguru Osako in the latter stages of the race, and set Moen up for the win. The question then became how fast could the Norwegian man go, and in running the final 2.2k in 6:24 he ensured his name is now forever in the record books as the first European athlete to break the 2:06 barrier.
🇳🇴
Race Results:
1 Sondre Nordstad Moen (NOR) 2:05:48
2 Stephen Kiprotich (UGA) 2:07:10
3 Suguru Osako (JPN) 2:07:19
4 Bedan Karoki (KEN) 2:08:44
5 Ammanuel Mesel (ERI) 2:09:22
6 Daisuke Uekado (JPN) 2:09:27
7 Yoshiki Takenouchi (JPN) 2:10:01
8 Michael Githae (KEN) 2:10:46
9 Yuki Kawauchi (JPN) 2:10:53
10 Takuya Fukatsu (JPN) 2:12:04

7188
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: 116
« on: December 06, 2017, 10:57:30 am »
BW: 90.7kg
Activity:
Misc:
Diet Compliance: 1/1
Mobility:
Skill work:

Starting over dietwise. Recovery lower & upper training today.

one day isn't a problem tho, seems like you needed it.

jelly of that ice cream snickers thing tho.. think I know what you're talking about.. has caramel inside right? lol.

7189
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Party's Over!
« on: December 06, 2017, 10:55:40 am »
FWIW I mentioned the PR train in the other thread, b4 seeing you mention it.. lmao!

yup, this is great stuff.

how did those sprints feel a few days ago? you feeling any differences lately, in part due to your PR's?

also, sprints before bench is pretty solid.

Over the 40m I'm feeling more powerful so I might have improved my 40m a bit but I haven't been timing any of my ME sprints. The 100m is a different story for two main reasons.

Firstly I haven't been doing any speed work or speed endurance so I'm physically just not trained to be in the state to run a fast 100m. Secondly and arguably just as, if not more importantly, I'm carrying too much body fat. My weight is only around 83kg but my body fat is probably about 15% mainly due to poor diet. Furthermore, for me personally I run faster when I'm leaner but also when I'm lighter. I've always said for me to run at my peak I need to be weighing around 75kg (165lbs) at <10% bodyfat.

It's kind of like running backs v wide receivers. Generally there isn't a hell of a lot of difference between the 40 times of running backs compared to wide receivers. Sometimes there are running backs that will even run faster 40's than the wide receivers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/40-yard_dash

"According to a five-year NFL combine report, wide receivers and cornerbacks had the fastest average times at 4.55, followed by running backs at 4.59. The following average times were measured between 2008 and 2012 at the NFL combine".

Position           Time
Wide receiver   4.55
Cornerback   4.55
Running back   4.59
Safety           4.62
Outside LB           4.74
Tight end           4.77
Fullback           4.80
Inside LB           4.80

As you can see there is virtually very little difference between the 40 yard speeds of wide receivers and running backs. Take it out to a 100m though and besides the freaky running backs (Chris Johnson 10.38 but he is on the small side for a running back at only 200lbs) the difference is light and day and the wide receivers smoke the running backs over that distance. To put it in comparison there have been lots of wide receivers & corner backs that have ran low 10.0s to combat Chris Johnson example e.g. Jacoby Ford.

nice thanks for the reply! Sounds good, just don't rush the body comp stuff that's for sure.. take the slow approach (nothing drastic) and allow everything to adjust over a longer period of time. Sound like that's what you're doing though. It looks like everything is coming together, your focus is incredible right now.

Yup, RB's would probably be more competitive on average through 60m in track. Not having the length hurts for them because they don't specialize in 100m usually, so they don't have those more natural advantages passed 60-70m. If they specialized though, i'd imagine they could be just as competitive with the WR's who have more length. Traditionally, successful 100m sprinters are built more like corner backs IMHO, not taller like WR's, so if running backs lost some mass and specialized more in 100m, I think they'd be more of a traditional 100m build. All of that is changing with Bolt though, I imagine we'll see tons of tall 100m sprinters in the future. I mean, most coaches would have probably laughed Bolt off the track if he talked about wanting to be a gold medalist 100m sprinter - he's just too tall and massive, no way he can recover from the first 60m. He proved everyone wrong though.. and now we'll see taller kids believing they can be the next "Bolt" in 100m. I'm expecting taller 100m guys in the 2028, 2032+ olympics etc.

Also, those numbers you listed are just the averages of course.. The outliers are absolutely mind blowing, ie when we see Linebackers running 4.4x-4.5x, offensive linemen running 4.7x etc.. Just insane. NFL athleticism is still the most impressive to me, out of all sports.

peace!

7190


Quote
Something in human nature causes us to start slacking off at our moment of greatest accomplishment. As you become successful, you will need a great deal of self-discipline not to lose your sense of balance, humility, and commitment

great quote IMHO. don't hear that often.. slacking at the moment of greatest accomplishment.

7191
800m+ Running and/or Conditioning / Re: Misc Running Photos
« on: December 06, 2017, 10:02:49 am »
photo on the account of the guy who ran that 4.17 in the antarctic.


7192
400m Sprinting or Shorter / Re: The Sprinter Physique Thread
« on: December 06, 2017, 09:40:39 am »
my b i was talking about Henricho Bruintjies

hah, my fault too.

Ya Bruintjies looks jacked af. He has some sick physique photos & some great posts in general, he's putting in some work that's for sure.

Tons of heavy but explosive quarter squat videos too:




7193
400m Sprinting or Shorter / Re: The Misc Sprint Thread
« on: December 06, 2017, 09:29:37 am »
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=2ZupBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=the+speed+encyclopedia+sprinters+max+squats&source=bl&ots=a9PF-Qocgn&sig=2kKJkbB-Hxmz6-VWJEUSB4s1B_0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwinm-6JnvXXAhVHTLwKHUeABtEQ6AEIODAC#v=onepage&q=the%20speed%20encyclopedia%20sprinters%20max%20squats&f=false

Page 36 of 'The Speed Encyclopedia' features elite sprinters and elite NFL players bodyweights, max squats, squat to bodyweight ratio, 40 yards and 100m times.

nice find!

i bet there's some serious squat form/depth variation going on in that list though, especially with the sprinters (higher depth squats).


7194
Basketball / Re: Dunk League
« on: December 06, 2017, 12:43:05 am »
e3 = epic

https://www.go90.com/videos/6COTLyYCtA7

man, doug anderson murders rims.. love seeing people's reactions when he crushes it.. so brutal.

Guy came out lethal.

CJ is one of my favorite dunkers to watch.. his slow mo's are epic. He does all kinds of extra stuff in the air, dude is so legit. Also, he had the best dunk in ep3 so far.. his first dunk in the freestyle, his signature, is just incredible.

JClark's dwight howard variation was amazing too.. 2nd best dunk of ep3.

They need to show the dunks better, my only gripe with it.. hate when it's "over edited".. but overall, very enjoyable series.

7195
Basketball / Re: Dunk League
« on: December 06, 2017, 12:33:11 am »
o sh*t... wildcard dunker = <spoiler>.. epic.

7196
- run 4.01 km in 19:17
janky run. normal route cut off because they'd shut down all access on the main road to the cricket ground. odd. someone important must have been planning to go that way in the next few minutes. self-important, i mean. the most popular politician in the country barely has guards. i ran into him the other week while getting groceries.

hah. i'd never have suspected that (barely has guards), just getting groceries like it's nothing.

Quote
anyway. work went late again tonight and i'm tired so i didn't want to go super long. i'm also frustrated so i turned around and just picked up the pace. ended up going reasonably hard for the first 2.75 km and then shut it down. splits were 4:49, 4:27, 4:37 (with 0.25km slow), 5:17. first three are quick for the road.

humbling to realize what 4:00 feels like to me right now. i touched sub-4:00 a couple of times when i was going down hill and consciously running. 19:59 5k is a long way off. patience.

- stretch

good stuff with the 4:XX's.





- run 4.5 km in 21:16

- walk/jog 0.7 km

- stretch

another janky-ass run. did the first 2 km in 9:00 on the nose, which is just under the pace i'll need to hit for the december goal of sub-23 5k. slowed down a bit and did the next 2 km in 9:48, which is closer to my natural track pace. then did a slow lap and change with gf at the end to cool down.

sleep schedule matters.

ya it does. same with dunking/vert etc. being properly rested, can be a huge difference maker.

7197
Boxing / Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeux
« on: December 05, 2017, 10:56:28 pm »
I got Rigo in 12 .. but i'm not confident about it.

rigo in 12 is a risky pick because he's just not as active as Loma .. but i'm basing my pick on him shutting Loma down. His counter punching & defense should slow Loma down for the first time in his career.. based on that, I pick Rigo.

7198
Boxing / Re: Lomachenko vs Rigondeux
« on: December 05, 2017, 10:55:23 pm »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6M6DHgFk3w" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6M6DHgFk3w</a>

7199
Boxing / Lomachenko vs Rigondeux
« on: December 05, 2017, 10:55:14 pm »
12/9

...

 :wowthatwasnutswtf:

7200
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: December 05, 2017, 08:32:42 pm »
some pre-race stuff.

last year's boca mile race:
- https://www.strava.com/activities/796527806
- http://www.adarq.org/progress-journals-experimental-routines/adarq's-journal/msg127427/#msg127427
- 5:20 official, 5:18 watch
- ~800m = 2:23
- 1km = 3:03

set estimated PR's for 400m, 800m, and 1km. Was completely dead after 1km.. More like dead at 800-900m lmao.



Same strategy as Saturday's race: override inhibition, do not resort to safe mode, and keep up with the lead guys for as long as possible, kicking it into overdrive at some point - not letting them separate from me without a real fight.. so, at least a very hard 1km or so. But, do not lead. DO NOT LEAD. Stay behind the lead guys and just adapt to what they are doing. Maybe only lead for a little when shooting it into overdrive as i'm emptying the tank, but inevitably they will pass me, these are 4.3x guys again.

Eventually that strategy will become: keep up with the lead guys and beat them.. so until then, it's keep up with the lead guys for as long as possible.

This is a straight course, no u-turns or hard turns. No u-turn excuses available etc.

Calves feel a bit beat up/dead today, should feel fine tomorrow though.

Pages: 1 ... 478 479 [480] 481 482 ... 1504