Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dreyth

Pages: 1 ... 47 48 [49] 50 51 ... 130
721
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: March 01, 2016, 04:29:28 pm »
The de-load version of your previous workout could be:

SUPERSET 1 - SQUAT ++ OHP:
6@85kg ++ 8@42.5kg
6@85kg ++ 8@42.5kg

SUPERSET 2 - BSS ++ PULLUPS:
8 each leg @ 40kg ++ 8 + 2
8 each leg @ 40kg ++ 6 + 4

SUPERSET 3 - RDL ++ LEG RAISE:
10@95kg ++ 20
5@115kg ++ 20

In other words, just slash the sets in half. If you really need it, you could also extend your rest periods by a minute. For the RDLs, I included the two of your heavier sets. For me, this keeps my strength higher than the other option since it doesn't allow the weights to feel heavier next workout. And if the weights feel heavier... it means the CNS isn't as tuned for it (loss of neural strength due to whatever).

I've experimented before with cutting reps in half versus cutting sets in half for my de-loads. I like cutting the sets in half better and keeping the reps the same because I feel I actually get a training effect that way. I am at least doing one set to near exhaustion and stimulating some kind of muscle growth/strength gain.

Think of it this way. Say you are capable of 4x10@100kg for some lift. What would keep your strength better:
- A year of doing 2x10@100kg, never more
- A year of doing 4x5@100kg, never more
I would say the first option would. So that's what I choose for the de-load.

722
also, PR: got 25% raise today. retroactive to october. next paycheck is gonna be more money than i've ever gotten at once in my whole life.

that is awesome. never heard of a retroactive raise before! Also that's a large % raise  :headbang:

723
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Dreyth's New Journal
« on: March 01, 2016, 11:23:47 am »
"Hip impingement" which is not really an issue but it doesn't feel comfortable with ATG style squats (I still go below parallel though) and my ankle mobility is lacking eventhough I've been working on it for months now and it has gotten definitely a lot better already.

Interesting, you've probably already tried a bunch of different things but you can: vary stance width, vary outward angle of feet, vary outward angle of knees.

you can squat with a narrow stance, toes pointed forward, but knees tracking way outside. who knows. maybe something will work.



good form.  ;D

eat more and lift 200kg.  :strong:

Projected max is ~440lbs already! And i'm looking to cut to 195lbs to put me at 2.25xbw  :P

Back when i squatted 365x3, i maxed at 405lbs the next session. My 3RM seems to be 90% of my max.
405x3 puts me at 450lbs but that seems out of reach even if the planets align.

440lbs sounds about right on a rested and hyped up day.

---

Woke up at 196.6lbs this morning

724
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Dreyth's New Journal
« on: March 01, 2016, 08:31:22 am »
Beautiful squats once again! I don't know if I'll ever be able to go that deep safely with my squats.

 :ibsquatting: :ibsquatting: :ibsquatting:

Do you have any issues?

725
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Dreyth's New Journal
« on: February 29, 2016, 09:21:17 pm »
Week 101
Quote
Monday - 02/29/16
197.8lbs

-= Workout Log =-

ATG Squat
135 x 8                                >> 2min rest.
135 x 8                                >> The de-load last Thursday served me well! Scheduled for 400x3 but did 405x3 instead.
185 x 5                                >> I don't think I'll be able to repeat this on Thursday. We'll see. I was nervous today = adrenaline.
185 x 3                                >> I've done 325x8 before, but since an even heavier set came before it it's a PR this time too.
225 x 3                                >> Slightly cutting back on the volume of these.
275 x 1
315 x 1
365 x 1
405 x 3
325 x 8 PR

Bench Press
45 x 15                               >> 3min rests.
95 x 8                                 >> Switched to good ol' 3x5 with 3min rests since I was stalling.
135 x 5                               >> Did not expect 5 reps, let alone two sets of it. Nice.
185 x 3
225 x 1
235 x 5 PR
235 x 5 PR
235 x 4 PR

Romanian Deadlift
225 x 5                           
275 x 3                 >> Previous PR was 385x8 on these. Working back up slowly.
315 x 1                 >> Hope I don't get crazy sore from these, so I can do them again Thursday.
365 x 5

Incline DB Bench Press
75's x 12                     >> 2min rest.
75's x 8                       >> Upped the rest on these. May also add in a set later on. Not sure yet.

Calf Raise Machine
420 x 5                            >> 60sec rests.
480 x 12 PR                       >> Machine maxes out at 495, which is one pin away from 480!
480 x 10 PR
480 x 8 PR

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfUDOVuYFZw" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfUDOVuYFZw</a>

726
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Dreyth's New Journal
« on: February 26, 2016, 10:27:56 pm »
Damn dude, awesome post on the knee up top and strong as hell squats! Started following your youtube channel....beast.

Thanks! I want to record my squat workouts from now on since I've started hitting PR's recently. They may slow to a stop soon. May also record RDL's but from the angle I usually record at, you'll just see a whole lot of my ass and not much else. I'll see what else I can record. I feel like there isn't many spots to put my phone down.

727
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Dreyth's New Journal
« on: February 26, 2016, 10:26:57 pm »
Week 100
Quote
Friday - 02/26/16

-= Workout Log =-

Cable Rows
160 x 5                          >> 60sec rests.
180 x 3                          >> Eh...
200 x 10
200 x 8
180 x 8
180 x 6
180 x 3

Lateral Raises
35's x 5                             >> 60sec rests.
40's x 2                             >> Woohoo!
45's x 1
50's x 1
45's x 9 PR
45's x 5
40's x 8 PR
40's x 6 PR
35's x 5 PR

Pull ups
BW x 15                   >> 60sec rests.
BW x 8
BW x 3
BW x 4
BW x 4

Ab Pulldowns
95 x 5                >> 60sec rests.
155 x 12 PR
155 x 8 PR
155 x 4 PR
 130 x 4 PR
  105 x 4 PR

Incline Rear Delt W Flyes
25's x 5                  >> 60sec rests.
30's x 1
35's x 11 PR
35's x 6 PR
35's x 5 PR

Great workout overall. Progress has been very slow lately. I still have no explanation for how my squat exploded from 365x3 to 395x3 in just a couple weeks (this happened like 6 weeks ago?). I'm still PR'ing inch by inch since then. It's also harder now since I'm cutting. Not logging my food though; it's just a ~5lb cut.

728
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: February 26, 2016, 10:45:26 am »
How have you de-loaded in the past? Do you drop the intensity, volume, density, etc? Did it work okay?

Just saying that every time i've de-loaded by lowering the weight, i've lost strength when I come back in and it takes some time to get it back (CNS). I have found de-loading to be more effective if i just cut all the sets in half, and rest a tiny bit longer between sets.

Another way i've found is very effective for me is to take an extra rest day or two. I don't mean skip workouts! I mean push the workouts back by a day. So if you lift mon-wed-fri, after lifting on mon-wed do sat-tue- and then push back again, fri-mon-wed-fri. You'll be back on schedule like that. This may not be feasible depending on your non-gym schedule though.

BUT if lowering the weights has worked for you in the past for just a week, go for it! Usually if de-loads don't work for me, I do a reset where i just lower the weights on all lifts by 10% and i slowly work back up to where i was and hopefully surpass my PR's after that. But i'll never do a de-load week where i lower weights by 20% or whatever just for that week. I always regret it.

729
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Dreyth's New Journal
« on: February 26, 2016, 10:36:00 am »
196.0lbs this morning, saving for later cuz i'll forget

730
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Dreyth's New Journal
« on: February 25, 2016, 08:56:22 pm »
Week 100
Quote
Thursday - 02/25/16
196.6lbs

-= Workout Log =-
De-load

ATG Squat
135 x 8                                >> 2min rest.
135 x 5                                >> No emotional arousal but still...knees caved on last TWO repts of 395 this time.
185 x 5                                >> Probably had only 5-6 of the 325 in me today.
185 x 3
225 x 3
275 x 1
315 x 1
365 x 1
395 x 3
325 x 3

Romanian Deadlift
225 x 5                 >> Hamstrings still sore when I do these... forgot to log it but I did this Tuesday too.

Bench Press
45 x 15                               >> 2min rest.
95 x 8
135 x 5
185 x 3
225 x 1
245 x 3
205 x 8

Calf Raise Machine
465 x 15

I needed this de-load. Maybe I'm weak because I'm glycogen depleted? Already dropped about 3lbs in just a couple days from restricting calories and carbs. I don't consciously restrict carbs -- i just try to get a lot more protein when i'm cutting, so it happens by itself.

Eyes on the goal I set earlier this year: June 1st, 405x3 consistent, 195lbs bw or less.

731
Article & Video Discussion / Re: New muscle found in quad
« on: February 25, 2016, 03:08:22 pm »
^^ We're back to the regular quad then  :'(

732
What's your weight? Target weight?
What's your target calories and target deficit?
Ever try intermittent fasting?

733
Article & Video Discussion / New muscle found in quad
« on: February 25, 2016, 03:00:58 pm »
We don't have quads. We have quints.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732825

Quote
The quadriceps femoris is traditionally described as a muscle group composed of the rectus femoris and the three vasti. However, clinical experience and investigations of anatomical specimens are not consistent with the textbook description. We have found a second tensor-like muscle between the vastus lateralis (VL) and the vastus intermedius (VI), hereafter named the tensor VI (TVI). The aim of this study was to clarify whether this intervening muscle was a variation of the VL or the VI, or a separate head of the extensor apparatus. Twenty-six cadaveric lower limbs were investigated. The architecture of the quadriceps femoris was examined with special attention to innervation and vascularization patterns. All muscle components were traced from origin to insertion and their affiliations were determined. A TVI was found in all dissections. It was supplied by independent muscular and vascular branches of the femoral nerve and lateral circumflex femoral artery. Further distally, the TVI combined with an aponeurosis merging separately into the quadriceps tendon and inserting on the medial aspect of the patella. Four morphological types of TVI were distinguished: Independent-type (11/26), VI-type (6/26), VL-type (5/26), and Common-type (4/26). This study demonstrated that the quadriceps femoris is architecturally different from previous descriptions: there is an additional muscle belly between the VI and VL, which cannot be clearly assigned to the former or the latter. Distal exposure shows that this muscle belly becomes its own aponeurosis, which continues distally as part of the quadriceps tendon. Clin. Anat. 29:256-263, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

734
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: February 25, 2016, 11:38:59 am »
Pretty cool. I think it's a good way to increase GPP, and it's nice that the supersets don't interfere with each other. Only cardio would interfere with the second of the supersetted exercises I guess, but you get better at that. I was thinking I wanted to try something like that in my training to cut workout times. How long do your workouts typically last?

735
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: February 25, 2016, 09:56:31 am »
vag how long do you generally rest between sets of squats and the other lifts? wondering how you do it with supersets.

Pages: 1 ... 47 48 [49] 50 51 ... 130