Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LBSS

Pages: 1 ... 579 580 [581] 582 583 ... 686
8701
Sports Discussion / Re: Ultimate frisbee
« on: May 13, 2011, 10:15:40 am »
sweet trick shots by one of the best recent college players: http://devour.com/video/frisbee-trick-shots/

8702
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Dancing
« on: May 12, 2011, 03:41:15 pm »
That's a good point... makes them "think less". Maybe more right side of the brain into it.

The more you think about movement, the worse it usually gets.

That's what I'm getting at. Dropping thought and just going with the flow doesn't always come natural to people who are used to actively engaging their concious brain in everything.  Alcohol can help temper down an overactive frontal cortex which tends to make movement singular and mechanical. The hindbrain (instinctual brain) is where you want to be for bodily movement . A few years back LBS's hero Lyle Mcdonald would even drink Vodka before he skated with the goal of taming his overactive frontal brain so he could become less mechanical on the ice. 

that's funny about lyle, didn't know that. only came to nutswinging on the tail end of his speed skating days so i missed most of what he wrote about his own training. closest thing i could find in a quick look around his forum was a joking suggestion to add "russian"-style events to speed skating meets, where you'd take a shot of vodka between every lap. would love to see where he actually talked about drinking while training, that would be funny.

you're still wrong, though. overactive frontal cortex* does not equal "intelligence"**. and anyway, you didn't contradict what i said. lowered inhibition and reduced overthinking are close to the same thing in my experience, especially when it comes to dancing. what does any of this have to do with "intelligence"?

back to your original question, though, and even taking "intelligence" at face value, where on earth did you get the idea that more-intelligent people tend to be worse dancers than less-intelligent people? that doesn't make sense and is not at all true in my experience.

petey0109, since when are "people that go with the flow" less "intelligent" than "overthinkers" or "overthinkers" necessarily more "intelligent" than everyone else?

also, since when did the bar for "good dancer" get set at "not being really jerky"? i can move in time to music, even sober. my movements get looser when i'm drunk, i think, but that doesn't make me a good dancer. in fact, trying to do any kind of coordinated dance gets HARDER when i'm drunk. i do care less that i'm not good at it, though. so there's that.

*relative to what? what's a normal level of cortical activity? what's subnormal and supernormal? why do those states exist? do they exist to a greater degree or more frequently in some people than others? why? how many people fall into each category? what effect do those differences have on movement? honest questions for which i'd be very curious to see answers.

**"intelligence" doesn't exist as a singular trait that you can isolate and measure, so is completely meaningless for any kind of comparative purpose. what do you mean by it?

8703
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Dancing
« on: May 12, 2011, 10:37:51 am »
what is an oscillatory iso.

8704
Woot. Nice PR's.

:highfive:  :headbang:  :wowthatwasnutswtf:  :ibjumping:


Thanks! Nice to make some progress after a few shitty workouts in a row. The key: sleep. It's a "duh" point but even when I don't feel tired, I'm usually underslept. There is a wide gulf between low fatigue and no fatigue.

Also, as adarq, pointed out in the PR thread, someone talking to me about my jumping and giving me some cue or other usually means I PR or close to it on the next jump. No idea why that would be. But I AM getting better at concentrating and jumping with other people around, as long as they're not also using the basket.

On the down side, I found out I'm going back to Afghanistan and Pakistan for a few weeks starting around mid-June. Should be cool trips but I'm not happy about three more weeks without normal gym facilities. Oh well, will try to make the best of it. In Pakistan I'll at least have access to the nice gym. Not sure about Afghanistan. Might try to finagle some nights at the nice hotel in Kabul, which has an okay gym. At the very least the ceilings are high enough there to make ME jumps/depth jumps a possibility. The fancy hotels are lonely as shit, though. Much prefer guest houses.

Just means I have to squeeze as much as possible out of the next month.

8705
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: funny / horrible training videos
« on: May 12, 2011, 09:47:28 am »
Wasn't that bad^^^

it's an example of a "functional" exercise that makes no physical sense. gravity points down.

8706
Program Review / Re: frank yang "40 inch vertical program"
« on: May 12, 2011, 09:44:10 am »
Nobody has something to say about it?  :ninja:

why don't YOU say something about it?

8707
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Dancing
« on: May 11, 2011, 09:20:05 pm »
good athletes are good athletes because they practice. good dancers are good dancers because they practice. what the fuck does any of this have to do with intelligence.

if you grew up around with black people you notice that the smarter the person is, in most cases the worse they are as a dancer even if they practice.

this is one of the dumbest fucking things i've ever read in my life.

Quote
it is true that practice has something to do with it, but how can you explain little kids who are naturally just drastically quicker but not neceessarily faster than their friends.

maybe they're naturally more talented, or maybe they spend more time running around and changing direction, so they get better at it. i don't know. probably a mix of talent and practice. just like dancing.

neither has any correlation with "intelligence," whatever the fuck that means. jesus christ.

8709
BW = ???
SORENESS = none
ACHES/INJURIES = none
FATIGUE = none

session 1: volume

- warmup

- sprint warmup

- sprints : 10-20's
2 @ 80%, 4 @ 90%

- dj (18-24") : 4 x 5 (24") or 4 x 8 (18")


subbed jumps. good idea cause... :personal-record: :ibjumping: :personal-record: :ibjumping: :personal-record: :highfive: :headbang: :strong:

- DLRVJ x ~15
mostly very good, one ~33" PR! right after a friend of mine said i was slowing down on the penultimate step. got hyped and loose, accelerated all the way to the plant, jumped high, grabbed rim hard. laughed out loud on the way down.

- squat : 3 x 5
275,275,275 == good

- BSS : 3 x 5 each
170,170,170 == hard

- light calf raise: 4 x 5
skipped, don't care

- core
Pallof press 3 x 10e x 80,50(paused),50(paused)

- stretch

8710
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Dancing
« on: May 11, 2011, 05:14:49 pm »
good athletes are good athletes because they practice. good dancers are good dancers because they practice. what the fuck does any of this have to do with intelligence.

8711
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: Age vs Vertical
« on: May 11, 2011, 02:37:34 pm »
nice!

not enough warm up before you started? could be the reason you were feeling sluggish.

8712
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Dancing
« on: May 11, 2011, 12:02:59 pm »
alcohol helps some people dance because it lowers inhibitions. people who are naturally stiff tend to relax, their movements get freer and they dance better. or at least, perceive that they dance better, because alcohol also skews perception.

so...you're saying that intelligent people are more inhibited than less-intelligent people?

8713
Basketball / Re: How good are NBA players?
« on: May 11, 2011, 09:19:09 am »
Imagine the best player you've ever played against, add athleticism, add 6 inches, add arm length.

then multiply by 100.

Edit: see this story. http://www.adarq.org/forum/progress-journals-experimental-routines/walking-lunges-vs-box-step-up/msg16242/#msg16242

That's how good.

8714
last night

BW = ???
SORENESS = none
ACHES/INJURIES = none
FATIGUE = moderate

- shoot around x 25 mins
went harder than usual, chasing down rebounds fast instead of lackadaisical, some ME layups, etc. worked up a good sweat

- foam roller x 30 mins

- stretch x 30 mins

8715
How are these guys so fast with hardly any muscle mass to speak of.  Is it soley based on their reactive abiltiy and leg and tendon lengths? I can see how they would have good top speed after 50meters or so....but what about the first 50?   

They have to be running  slower 40 times compared to NFL defensive backs who pack a good amount of muscle on them.  Am I right?

The fastest NFL guys might get close over short distances, but comparing NFL times and sprint times is a bit difficult  impossible and/or a complete joke because the timing is so different. Track times the clock starts and the athlete has to react (adds 0.1-0.2s) whereas for NFL combine times the clock is started by someone who pushes a button when he sees the athlete set off (removes 0.2-0.3 seconds).

Wells was 6'0 190lbs which isn't really that skinny. I think he was pretty strong over short distances too so he was probably pretty strong.

Fixed.

Also: Wells was very fast. Therefore, he was very strong in the way he needed to be strong. The end.

Pages: 1 ... 579 580 [581] 582 583 ... 686