Adarq.org

That malik monk guy can flat out score.... future espn top 10 for getting 50s maybe even 60s in the nba.

50's or 60's? lool chill.

I actually really like De'Aaron Fox alot, almost more impressed with him. He's so damn fast & skilled. They are an NBA backcourt in college, that's for sure. Both will be legit threats in the NBA.

got my old notes code working -> rebuilt my old purescript code.. soooo happy.

going to get a happy wonderful sleep because of it.

OMFGGGGG

 

today so far:


03/25/2017

Bio: Morning

last night's sleep: 7.5 hours
last night fell asleep: 7 AM
wakeup = 2:30 PM
- 
bw = 156
morning resting heart rate = didn't measure
soreness = quads slightly, hamstrings slightly
aches = left hamstring tendon slightly
injuries = none
quad stretches throughout the day = none
standing desk (when on computer): no
feel = ok
water = alot
mosquito bites: 0



Session: Evening

5 PM

calisthenics/BW

partials at the top: neutral grip pullups: BW x 30
partials at the top: dips: BW x 60

OMFG

 

man Kansas seems really strong..

Quote from: LBSS on March 16, 2017, 12:31:52 am

Quote from: Final Phenom on March 15, 2017, 03:24:55 pm

I love throwing in some weight on pullups. It's cool to be able to regulate the intensity of such a great movement and in my experience helps me improve faster. People definitely don't do that enough.

What do you think is a good way to attach the weight? I usually just use a lifting belt and chain free weights on between the knees.

never seen a better way than this.

I have no idea about the better-ness of this technique, but Lu Xiaojun double belts the weights so that they're behind him.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=autejMlg2wY" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=autejMlg2wY</a>

I guess for dips it helps keep you more upright so the loads is on delts/tris?

damn that's weird, never done weighted dips like that. also, oly lifters always have such impressive backs, ridic.

I was wishing for a nice language to script in too lately but I dont think you're gna do much better than modern ECMAscript.

well ya, ecmascript would make my life easier in many ways.. mostly from the stability/environment side of things. The environment side especially -> the javascript world is a mess, but it's simple to get things setup with bower/npm/browserify/whatever .. there's millions of solutions. These languages i'm playing with are just too young. Purescript is pretty stable.. much more  stable than GHCJS. They just have so any changes between major releases, that my code has drifted so far, that it's just perhaps too much effort right now getting it all to work.

after failing with ghcjs all day .. i might go the ecmascript route.

the thing is, i really dislike webdev.. so, i'm not actually trying to spend lots of time doing it. I just want to get something up  & working at this point, so i can get back to studying using my notes system... the forum project is still on hold.. with that, i'd still love to go the full stack route -> but i don't want to re-write my backend in another language.. so right now, that's full stack haskell. The main reason why I want to go full stack (haskell), is because when I write the forum UI for the browser, I also want to write a console/text client for myself, so I can use that primarily.. the way I have things structured right now, that was entirely a possibility.. because the UI and any other interfaces, share this same core I wrote.

i'm going to still just hold off on finishing the forum project for a while.. it's too stressful even thinking about how much of a failure that has been. i'd be done by now if I didn't run into problems with purescript or ghcjs, and that's really annoying to think about.. HEH.

edit: i'm about to get a small riotjs app going, to give me a simple ui for my notes app.

pc!