Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AlexV

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
31
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: GHR soreness
« on: October 02, 2012, 09:09:08 pm »
yeah,
I've read bretts book and am quite familiar with their justification. if he had the machine for sale then maybe.  I also dont think they are needed.  but if people wanna do them no problem.  also my thighs are too big.  I would need someone to deadlit the bar on to me or set up a platform...  I guess that shows I attempted to try them...  see... too awkward

32
Boxing / Re: great boxing tonight - lots of beatdowns
« on: October 01, 2012, 08:06:31 pm »
there sure are a number of great fighters hovering around each others weight class

33
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: GHR soreness
« on: October 01, 2012, 06:57:47 pm »
I've never done them.  They may be great but I can be somewhat resistant to change.  I get tons of glute work during a proper RDL (provided your core is strong enough to stabilize your spine and pelvis).

IMO they seem like novelty for novelty's sake.

34
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: GHR soreness
« on: October 01, 2012, 04:54:45 pm »
you are correct although I have not jumped on the hip thrust bandwagon yet.

35
Boxing / Re: great boxing tonight - lots of beatdowns
« on: October 01, 2012, 02:47:45 pm »
good stuff.. that last fight on hbo was nuts.. dude's ear was bleeding (from internal?).. i can't believe he made it past the 1st round.. he was wrecked yet managed to survive until round 6 or so? each round he was getting destroyed but would fight back just enough for it not to get stopped.

wtf is up with marquez/pacquiao 4... i seriously would rather watch them fight other people at this point.

Agreed.  The fights were very entertaining.  The ear was an external cut around the ear lobe. 

I am with you on pac/mart 

How come we hear no rumblings of pac or mayweather vs sergio

36
its cause he is soo tall

37
if you are 200lbs then 3xbw is 600.  how many 600lb squatters are out there.  People on boards make reaching those levels seem easy.  Getting to 3xbw is tough.  I have had surgeries trying to get to that level.  If you are an athlete your surgeries should come from your sport and not the weight room.

Imagine how much of a toll squatting 570 for 3x3 would take on the body.  how much of your recovery ability would it sapp.  what toll would it take on the joints: hips and knees.  now all that recovery ability that should be spent recovering from practice is now spend adapting to the squat.  Also could you squat 570x3x3 and still play ball later that day.  Still go to practice and give it 100%  No way in hell.  Even if you did how much worse would your joints feel.  All that sprinting and landing in addition to that brutal squat workout.

Something has to give.  IMO when training an athlete I would rather have them play and practice over squatting big.  Afterall the sport is the goal, not the squat (unless PLing)

38
I love the ratios.

Here is my take (and I may be the source of the 2.5xbw squat making you slow)

2xBW is attainable by every male.  Now it may come easy for some and not so easy for others.  But everyone can do it.  The efforts in reaching this level should not interfere with your standard sport/jump training. 

2.5xbw is much harder to get too but can be done by some without interfering with your goals (why are we squatting in the first place)

Over 2.5xbw requires too much strength training specialization.  If this is your goal then fine.  I have squatted slightly over 3xbw and let me tell you it took years of dedicated strength training.  The effort required to do this, IMO, requires you to spend too much time away from your goal (jumping and sport right).  In other words to reach this goal you have become a strength athlete (PLer or OLYer) and are no longer an athlete (bball, jump, etc...). 

Dave tate said as much in his article today

If an OLineman can squat 600 (~2xBW) will increasing his squat to 700 improve his performance or should all the special exercise (time, energy, recovery ability) required to get there be better spent learning the play book, recognizing defenses, improving footwork and blocking technique?

In my experience our best jumpers squatted in the 2-2.5 bw area.  Our best jumper ever 42" squatted 2.5xbw.  He was really reactive.  like a pogo stick.  If this is you then the 2.5bw squat may be the prescription.  If not then 2xbw may be the right fit.  At over 2.5xbw we see less carry over.  Why?  IMO it takes too much specialization.  At that point you are a squatter and not a jumper.

So your squat should be on a continual upward path but it should compliment your goal, not be your ultimate goal (if you are an athlete)

how do you get there?

I like the starting strength model -> texas method (although not the GOMAD approach)

day 1
squat 3x5
Press 3x5
Clean/jump squat 5x3

Day 2
Squat 3x5
Bench 3x5
DL 1x5

then move to texas method...  I'll just show the squat

Day 1
Squat 5x5 using 90% of previous Fridays 1rm

Day 3
Squat 2x5 using 80% of mondays load

Day 5
Squat 1x5rm

Now monday is the training stimulus day, wed is active rest, friday is testing. 

If friday is not increasing you modify mondays workout. 

2 options:

If your 5rm stalls and you cannot  complete all 5x5 monday then you need to decrease mondays volume.  Maybe use same weight and do 3x5 or 6x3.

If your 5rm stalls and you are completing mondays 5x5 then monday is not hard enough.  Go heavier on monday and do 5x5 or you can go even heavier and do 6x3, etc...  you get the idea, make Mondays squat session suck even more. 

I like the approach because we are modifying the weights around your sport practice and not the other way around because we are athletes first and foremost.  That is why most of us are here.  Not for PLing but for jump and sport.

the Texas method should not interfere too much with your sport training as there is only really 1 shitty workout in the week: monday.

Now if you want to peak for testing your jump or the upcoming season it is also simple to modify: replace fridays 1x5rm with a DE day like so:

Day 1
Squat 5x5 using 90% of previous Fridays 1rm
Low-mod jumps

Day 3
Squat 2x5 using 80% of mondays load
Low-mod jumps

Day 5
Squat 50-70% x 8-10 x 2-3
Plus high intensity jumping

Then for a more advanced sport program add in the 1x5rm and replace 5x5 with DE method  Like:

Day 1
Squat 50-70% x 8-10 x 2-3
Hi int jumps

Day 3
Squat 2x5 using 80% of mondays load
Low- jumps

Day 5
Squat 1 x 5rm
Plus mod intensity jumping

Whew!

In long term planning I think this should make up the first 2-3 years.  Then when it stalls and the modifications stop working I would move more towards the russian style programming.

this should get people thinking a bit

39
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: GHR soreness
« on: October 01, 2012, 01:44:12 pm »
I agree with everyone  natural ghr are too tough on the hamstrings and knees.  If you have access to a real ghr they are a great exercise

40
Warm up with iyt and wall slides

LTNS.

hope everything is good man..

Things are going well.  Went through a year of hell, lost both parents and my dog so i didn't have time for the internet stuff.  Took all my energy to work   The dust has settled though so I should be around a bit more.

41
I agree with lance  if uou use the broomstick also look in a mirror.  You can maintain the 3 pts of contact an drop in to snterior pelvic tilt plus lordosis  which is what kance thinks your problem is

42
Warm up with iyt and wall slides

43
it is a good program and I use it in different phases to improve vertical jump.

44
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: lead by example
« on: August 21, 2011, 02:32:28 pm »
Gotta be ready for level 7

45
Also dont get obsessed about parallel.  Only go as low as you can properly.  Over time you should be able to get deeper and deeper.

Alex, I have never understood why you would recommend that to a guy, especially a beginner, over the internet. I can to a degree understand why in group coaching situations with team sport athletes you might not have the time to coach a full squat to everyone. But this person is trying to learn full squats, because they are a better exercise for a beginner, and needs to be introduced to correct form as long as the weights are light. I doubt that doing it wrong now will make it easier to do it correct later. In the process of doing squats high nothing is learned that helps doing squats low later, since in most cases technical problems are the reason for the inability of reaching good depth with reasonable form.

If he is spilling into his low back, quads , and hamstrings then he is not squatting correctly (if performance is your goal, squatting for OLY or PL is different).  He needs to be getting to his glutes. Depth has nothing to do with this, proper movement does.  So why not move properly.  The OP said he no longer gets his glutes going in squats and loads his erector spinae and hams during DL's, thus It seems safe to conclude he is losing position or form.

I recently saw a few McGill presentations in person and he echoed the same points.  Going to parallel for parallel's sake in the face of bad technique (not getting to the glutes) will lead to injury.  He also asked people "Why do you need to get to parallel?"   Everyone said the sme thing "P-chain..."  His response was that if that is the reasn you have never seen a properly conducted EMG study or have a very poor understanding of functional anatomy.  I sat there and wondered how many heads his presentation was fling over at that moment.

So in summary only do what you can do with perfect form and over time proper strength development may open up new ROM's

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6