Author Topic: ADARQ's journal  (Read 1667130 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4920 on: October 14, 2012, 03:18:04 am »
0
complete relaxation today.. took notes on some stuff, did a small amount of forum coding.

the weather right now in Florida is perfect.

tmw = run, {squat/db ohp/db sa row/calf raise} + [curlz}

low back is still fatigued unfortunately..

pc

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12859
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7966
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4921 on: October 14, 2012, 02:57:23 pm »
0
why not allowing weaker limb to dictate reps per set and total reps? my impression has always been that it's better to use the weaker limb as the equalizer, to prevent exacerbation of the imbalance.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4922 on: October 14, 2012, 03:53:19 pm »
0
why not allowing weaker limb to dictate reps per set and total reps? my impression has always been that it's better to use the weaker limb as the equalizer, to prevent exacerbation of the imbalance.

right, i kind of look at it a little differently. studies show that strength training one limb only, can yield improvements in the opposite limb.. so, if i notoriously have issues with a weaker limb (left), i might as well go as hard as possible on the stronger limb because it may in fact transfer over.. it may be working, not sure though.. because I am going as hard as possible with each arm.

it's not that big of an issue though because, the only real huge disparity in strength, is with overhead pressing.. other than that, my left doesn't lag too far behind my right in single arm bench or row.. but ya i'd rather push each one to it's 'limit' so that I get those extra possible benefits for non-dominant from strength increases in my dominant limb.

don't know what's up with my left arm and overhead pressing... it really is much weaker than my right.

peace

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4923 on: October 14, 2012, 06:30:27 pm »
0
10/14/2012

BW = 173
SORENESS = back
ACHES/INJURIES = back (low/mid/lats) = tight/fatigued
FATIGUE = low

SESSION:

S1: single arm DB overhead press: 50 lb @ (R=12,L=5), (R=12,L=7), 40 lb @ (R=20,L=12)
S1: SSBAR deep squat: worked up to 205 x 5
S1: Chinups: BW @ 3 x 8

2: single arm DB hammer curl: 30 lb @ (R=12,L=15), (R=10,L=12)
3: single arm DB curl: 30 lb @ (R=15,L=16)

4: dead hang pullup holds, twist, etc.. to loosen up my back/lats

done


happy about the 50 lb single arm o.h.p

was going to try 70 lb db bench but said F it, i might do it on tuesday.

peace!

UMThrower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 761
  • Respect: +72
    • View Profile
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4924 on: October 14, 2012, 08:01:49 pm »
0
Here's my two cents with regards to the imbalance overhead pressing. You might have some weakness in the smaller muscles that keep the shoulder socket intact. If they're working in overdrive to keep the integrity of the socket while pressing, you're probably gonna see a drop off in strength in that shoulder. I don't know specific anatomy stuff for the shoulder to know what muscles would be causing that so obviously can't help you there. But could be something to look into if you really care about getting even strength in your shoulders.
6'3"
230lbs
35lb Weight: 17.46m
16lb Hammer: 57.36m
2k Discus: 46.16m

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4925 on: October 16, 2012, 01:53:06 am »
0
Here's my two cents with regards to the imbalance overhead pressing. You might have some weakness in the smaller muscles that keep the shoulder socket intact. If they're working in overdrive to keep the integrity of the socket while pressing, you're probably gonna see a drop off in strength in that shoulder. I don't know specific anatomy stuff for the shoulder to know what muscles would be causing that so obviously can't help you there. But could be something to look into if you really care about getting even strength in your shoulders.

right i need to do more direct shoulder work, for sure.

nothing i do is going to catch it up completely to my right though, it's more of a motor learning issue over years and years.. right will always be stronger, sure it could catch up a bit more though.





right hip bugging me a bit tonight.. tweaked it doing something completely unrelated to training/athletics/etc.. just stepping around something all weird, felt the muscle (tfl or something) spaz out real quick.


10/15/2012

BW = 175
SORENESS = none
ACHES/INJURIES = right hip via the dumbest shit, not from training
FATIGUE = crazy low

SESSION: quick

S1: neutral grip pullups: BW @ 3 x 8
S1: SSBAR deep squat: 125 @ 3 x 20
S1: single arm DB bench press: 50 lb @ W, 60 lb @ (R=15,L=10), (R=14,L=10)

2: single arm DB curl: 40 lb @ (R=9,L=10)




stupid hip crap.. so annoying, tfl just spazzed now it's all achy.

lifts felt great, 20 rep squats felt great, didnt bug me as i did them.


pC!#!@#

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4926 on: October 17, 2012, 01:48:47 am »
0
i won't be forum'ing as much for the next two weeks because i have lots of studying to do.. studying plus some other stuff.

i'l still be on but just not all day like i've been lately.. after 2 weeks, should be back to normal.




10/16/2012

bw = 178
soreness = none, feel great
aches/injuries = only right hip from that dumb tweak
fatigue = moderate

SESSION:

S1: single arm DB row: 70 lb @ 3 x 12
S1: SSBAR deep squat: 145 @ 3 x 20

tired@!$

peace

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4927 on: October 17, 2012, 07:49:33 am »
0
lul 181 this morning.

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14567
  • Respect: +2493
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4928 on: October 17, 2012, 10:58:42 am »
-1
lul 181 this morning.

Huh!?

From your "normal" 150 lbs? What happened to reversehypetrophy?

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12859
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7966
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4929 on: October 17, 2012, 12:03:51 pm »
+2
lul 181 this morning.

Huh!?

From your "normal" 150 lbs? What happened to reversehypetrophy?

god damn it, raptor, when will you learn to read the goddamn log before asking questions that are answered IN THE LOG.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14567
  • Respect: +2493
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4930 on: October 17, 2012, 12:23:33 pm »
-3
lul 181 this morning.

Huh!?

From your "normal" 150 lbs? What happened to reversehypetrophy?

god damn it, raptor, when will you learn to read the goddamn log before asking questions that are answered IN THE LOG.

Never, it would take too much time to search around for stuff.
October 17, 2012, 12:23:33 pm - Hidden. Show this post.

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6010
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4931 on: October 17, 2012, 12:27:22 pm »
+1
^Guilty as charged!!!  :pissed:
Most of the times the answer is in the same page , a few posts above.
Many other times you ask something you have asked again.

Not that this will make you change, just saying...  :P
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14567
  • Respect: +2493
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4932 on: October 17, 2012, 02:25:55 pm »
-1
Now now, don't remind me the time you posted what I posted a few posts above.

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6010
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4933 on: October 17, 2012, 02:49:28 pm »
+1
Now now, don't remind me the time you posted what I posted a few posts above.

LOL, a glorious moment indeed , well played!
Still can't even compare to your numerous and spectacular reading-the-log-before-you-reply fails , you are the rightful and undoubted king of the forum at that!
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14567
  • Respect: +2493
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: ADARQ's journal
« Reply #4934 on: October 17, 2012, 03:46:11 pm »
0
I'm not going to reply back until you tell me who the king of the forum at reading-the-log-before-you-reply at fails is. And don't tell me to read one post before!