Author Topic: Age vs VO2max  (Read 984683 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

entropy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1684
  • b00m!
  • Respect: +276
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2310 on: August 06, 2014, 10:32:41 pm »
+1
Vag if your legs are lean and your upper back hasn't got much fat left that's one thing. Men pattern fat storage is back (upper and lower) and belly. So you prob have typical male storage unless you have typical woman storage. I have bitch storage, my ass is still fat lols. My point was be like spielberg, cut cut cut, till there in no doubt you are at an athletic bodyfat of 10%. Then clean bulk and keep a tight watch on bodyweight.
Goals: Cutting to 6-8% bodyfat

Coges

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3107
  • Respect: +2267
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2311 on: August 06, 2014, 11:23:38 pm »
0
Interesting discussion and a complete mind fuck for anyone who has has ever been skinny and has tried to add muscle. I know I sound like a fanboy but I like this article when talking about how low you need to go bf% wise.

http://anthonymychal.com/2013/02/clean-bulk-fail-6-you-dont-understand-the-solid-base/

This link is in the article too but has some more varied pictures on different bodyfat levels.

http://anthonymychal.com/chaos-bodyfat/

In my personal experience I've been guilty of swinging too much on this. I've been around the 12% and wanted to cut further and then the next week when I'm cutting and losing strength and muscle I freak out and start going back the other way. It's a great recipe for going round in circles.
"Train as hard as possible, as often as possible, while staying as fresh as possible"
- Zatsiorsky

entropy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1684
  • b00m!
  • Respect: +276
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2312 on: August 06, 2014, 11:35:06 pm »
0
In my personal experience I've been guilty of swinging too much on this. I've been around the 12% and wanted to cut further and then the next week when I'm cutting and losing strength and muscle I freak out and start going back the other way. It's a great recipe for going round in circles.

Easy to explain this coges. The first thing is when you're cutting serously you'll eventually start to burn off IMTG fat. This is the good fat that sits inside muscle, intramuscular triglyceride. This makes muscles look flat, lifeless and empty. So you think oh noes, im losing muscle, better panic and stop cutting. No, that's just an overreaction. The 2nd thing is, prolonged dieting will eventually fuck you up in terms of over-training. So being smart about it, knowing when to layoff the cardio (which for some reason we always wanna do on a cut but it might not be necessary on a decent caloric deficit). Training  2x a week might be the sweet spot. Train hard, but reduce frequency.  Give your body enough days to rest between sessions. 
Goals: Cutting to 6-8% bodyfat

Coges

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3107
  • Respect: +2267
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2313 on: August 06, 2014, 11:54:10 pm »
0
In my personal experience I've been guilty of swinging too much on this. I've been around the 12% and wanted to cut further and then the next week when I'm cutting and losing strength and muscle I freak out and start going back the other way. It's a great recipe for going round in circles.

Easy to explain this coges. The first thing is when you're cutting serously you'll eventually start to burn off IMTG fat. This is the good fat that sits inside muscle, intramuscular triglyceride. This makes muscles look flat, lifeless and empty. So you think oh noes, im losing muscle, better panic and stop cutting. No, that's just an overreaction. The 2nd thing is, prolonged dieting will eventually fuck you up in terms of over-training. So being smart about it, knowing when to layoff the cardio (which for some reason we always wanna do on a cut but it might not be necessary on a decent caloric deficit). Training  2x a week might be the sweet spot. Train hard, but reduce frequency.  Give your body enough days to rest between sessions.

Oh yeah in my case it's all mental in terms of feeling too lean like I'm losing size and wanting to swing back the other way too quickly. I have not had consistency of diet or training in the past so that's my biggest hurdle. I've got the training going along nicely atm, just need to bring the diet in too.
I don't think I've ever been overtrained though and personally wouldn't be too concerned about that. When I don't exercise frequently I'm far worse with my eating so for me personally that would be horrible.

My main point, and that of the article, is that people overestimate how low they need to go bf% wise before doing the clean bulk. As you mentioned the prolonged cut is an overall mind fuck and not great for strength, muscle mass, hormone balance, etc. 
« Last Edit: August 07, 2014, 12:01:09 am by Coges »
"Train as hard as possible, as often as possible, while staying as fresh as possible"
- Zatsiorsky

entropy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1684
  • b00m!
  • Respect: +276
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2314 on: August 07, 2014, 12:38:32 am »
0
What i was getting at is that we sometimes think we're getting weaker but all it is, is a lack of adequate rest. This is especially the case while dieting because we can't train the same as we're used to. Coupled with not looking like you lift when you are cutting (carb depleted muscles, loss of IMTG etc) you can easily convince yourself you've got to stop cutting because you're losing muscle/strength when these are just illusions.

I dont think it's realistic that most people overestimate their cutting duration. If anything most are likely  to say, im too skinny now, better stop cutting, even those those are just artefacts of diets that you will look and feel small/weak especially on the tail end of a longer cut. For example, i'd love to tell myself, damn, i'm 78kg, better stop cutting, im probably at least 10% bodyfat now! But in reality i know i have enough cutting ahead of me that it would be a mistake to end cutting. It's okay and good to take breaks between stints of dieting. Last time i made the mistake of cutting too long - this time i'm taking a much more cavalier approach, bigger deficits to get thing out of the way asap. I'll be taking diet breaks in between to avoid problems with prolonged dieting (mood, hormones, etc).
Goals: Cutting to 6-8% bodyfat

Coges

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3107
  • Respect: +2267
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2315 on: August 07, 2014, 01:50:08 am »
0
What i was getting at is that we sometimes think we're getting weaker but all it is, is a lack of adequate rest. This is especially the case while dieting because we can't train the same as we're used to. Coupled with not looking like you lift when you are cutting (carb depleted muscles, loss of IMTG etc) you can easily convince yourself you've got to stop cutting because you're losing muscle/strength when these are just illusions.

Good point. I haven't been on a cut like you're doing. When I was -500cal I never experienced any real issues though.

I dont think it's realistic that most people overestimate their cutting duration. If anything most are likely  to say, im too skinny now, better stop cutting, even those those are just artefacts of diets that you will look and feel small/weak especially on the tail end of a longer cut. For example, i'd love to tell myself, damn, i'm 78kg, better stop cutting, im probably at least 10% bodyfat now! But in reality i know i have enough cutting ahead of me that it would be a mistake to end cutting. It's okay and good to take breaks between stints of dieting. Last time i made the mistake of cutting too long - this time i'm taking a much more cavalier approach, bigger deficits to get thing out of the way asap. I'll be taking diet breaks in between to avoid problems with prolonged dieting (mood, hormones, etc).

I think most people stop for the wrong reasons (losing size) but still believe they need to go further which fucks up the whole process.
I admire your dedication but couldn't do what you're doing myself. I would near kill myself if I got down that low in weight.
"Train as hard as possible, as often as possible, while staying as fresh as possible"
- Zatsiorsky

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2316 on: August 07, 2014, 05:34:27 am »
0
But how exactly do you cut if you don't want to count calories?

And how come you don't pass out or freak out due to not supplying sugars/glucose etc if you do a one day fast or whatever?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2317 on: August 07, 2014, 08:59:05 am »
+1
@chisM, coges, entropy:
Good points and discussion. The key to all this is ( imho ) don't obsess and over analyze.  Keep it simple, study the basic principles, follow a well structured plan that includes those principles, let it all fall in place.

@raptor:
I know you hate counting kcals, but you can't cut if you don't count. It doesn't have to be a decimal point precision count though.
Go roughly. You are 185/85kg, you burn around 2000 without working out, so eat around 1500-1800 on rest days, 1800-2000 on workout days. Google 'food-name plate calories' for your ordinary menu choices and you will find about how much each thing has. And that is all to it.
EDIT: Hm, you can do it in another way. Don't count shit. Reduce the portions you eat. Don't reduce the protein sources, only the carbs/sugars/fat. For example when eating meat with rice, eat half the rice of the normal portion. When you attack nutella, eat half the box instead of all. Try to have a consistent plan ( same foods each week ) so you can have the same caloric income every week. Keep this for 2-3 weeks, see what happens to weight, readjust ( eat a bit more if you lost too much, eat some less if you didn't lose enough ). You'll find a nice balance fast and easy that way and never count shit.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2014, 09:09:17 am by vag »
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

entropy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1684
  • b00m!
  • Respect: +276
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2318 on: August 07, 2014, 09:09:49 am »
0
@chisM, coges, entropy:
Good points and discussion.

It was really insightful for me too. I finally realised why i have had a 4pac for so long even though im so overweight - like even 15-20kg overweight my abs were popping thru. It's a symptom of  having female fat storage pattern, means i will have a sixpac long before im done cutting - becuase the stubborn fat is around hips, buttocks and thighs. Never realised that til now but now it makes so much sense. Its the same problem female bbs have - they'll have ripped upper body and abs but still be fat below the waist.
Goals: Cutting to 6-8% bodyfat

Coges

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3107
  • Respect: +2267
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2319 on: August 07, 2014, 09:13:25 am »
0
@chisM, coges, entropy:
Good points and discussion. The key to all this is ( imho ) don't obsess and over analyze.  Keep it simple, study the basic principles, follow a well structured plan that includes those principles, let it all fall in place.

V true.

@raptor:
I know you hate counting kcals, but you can't cut if you don't count. It doesn't have to be a decimal point precision count though.
Go roughly. You are 185/85kg, you burn around 2000 without working out, so eat around 1500-1800 on rest days, 1800-2000 on workout days.
Google 'food-name plate calories' for your ordinary menu choices and you will find about how much each thing has. And that is all to it.

You need to count to begin with but once you have an idea of what foods equal what you can pretty much eat around what you know. I have a base amount of food I eat pretty much every day and then just vary the carbs and fats depending on whether I train or not. Makes eating pretty simple.
"Train as hard as possible, as often as possible, while staying as fresh as possible"
- Zatsiorsky

Coges

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3107
  • Respect: +2267
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2320 on: August 07, 2014, 08:13:42 pm »
0
And how come you don't pass out or freak out due to not supplying sugars/glucose etc if you do a one day fast or whatever?

Try it and see.
If you're still having carbs then your glycogen stores will be sufficient to see you through a 24 hr fast easily. Even if you're exercising in a fasted state you'll still do ok.
"Train as hard as possible, as often as possible, while staying as fresh as possible"
- Zatsiorsky

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2321 on: August 11, 2014, 09:50:24 am »
+1
Body composition measurements:

Net morning weight : 82.4kg / 181.6lbs , same with last time, ties season low!!!
Waist : 86cm / 33.85'' ,  new all time  :personal-record: , broke the 34'' barrier  :wowthatwasnutswtf:

Online bodyfat estimation : 15%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : n/a
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : n/a

Previous:
Net morning weight : 82.4kg / 181.6lbs
Waist : 86.5cm / 34.05'' ,  new all time  :personal-record:

Online bodyfat estimation : 15.4%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : n/a
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : n/a

Woah, it is working.
Same weight but smaller waist. Maybe water ( or whatever ) retention because i cant see how my bodyfat dropped and my weight is the same, you don't add muscle while sitting on your butt and dieting every day.
I look leaner too. Abs are now 2-and-a-half-pack in the morning, cuts more visible in shoulder muscles, bicep veins a bit more visible, vmos and back kinda more toned too.
Still, gonna go entropy style and say that to be truly lean ( not 10% or anything close to that, just typical lean looking, legit 13-14 ) i should be below 80, probably closer to 75. And there we have a problem because i don't want to be that light, not to mention that my clothes wont fit me.
We will see, carrying on as i am for now, IF FTW!!!!
« Last Edit: August 11, 2014, 09:57:08 am by vag »
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12856
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7961
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2322 on: August 11, 2014, 10:26:09 am »
0
come onnnnn, sub-34. when was the last time you took the full greek-statue measurements?
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2323 on: August 11, 2014, 06:18:19 pm »
0
Why you don't want to be that light?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2324 on: August 12, 2014, 06:32:09 pm »
+1
@LBSS : just when that thread was opened here. Might redo it, was funny.

@raptor: one reason is the stated, my wardrobe will be useless. But as i have said many times, i prefer being heavier, carrying more muscle. I just like it. If i could choose i would much prefer to be like NFL guys and lebron( the 270ish, not the current ) over high/long jumpers and durant. Still cutting though, and i will not start bulking when i go back to gym in 10 days. Gonna try to stay at 81-82 that i will be by then and improve as much as i can strength and movement efficiency at that weight to see what will happen.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?