Author Topic: Age vs VO2max  (Read 985202 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

entropy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1684
  • b00m!
  • Respect: +276
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2340 on: August 14, 2014, 12:55:05 am »
0
Here's how I approach it. If you can see good ab definition (4-6) in the mirror whilst flexing then you're ok to stabilise and start going back the other way.

Depends on the person though. If you are weight training and have some decent sized abs, you'll be able to see them quite early in a cut. does that mean you dont have to bother cutting? Maybe, maybe not, depends on what it means to see that defn. For me i cud see it when i was around 85kg..   pretty early on and not really lean. So suppose i end up cutting to 72kg to be in single digits bf%, what use would it have been to go by ab visibility, for me, not useful. For someone else, perhaps they only see their abs when they're close to 10%. All depends on the person, how built their abs are, how they store fat, etc. Too much variation for my liking to go by that alone..
Goals: Cutting to 6-8% bodyfat

Coges

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3107
  • Respect: +2267
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2341 on: August 14, 2014, 02:08:18 am »
0
Here's how I approach it. If you can see good ab definition (4-6) in the mirror whilst flexing then you're ok to stabilise and start going back the other way.

Depends on the person though. If you are weight training and have some decent sized abs, you'll be able to see them quite early in a cut. does that mean you dont have to bother cutting? Maybe, maybe not, depends on what it means to see that defn. For me i cud see it when i was around 85kg..   pretty early on and not really lean. So suppose i end up cutting to 72kg to be in single digits bf%, what use would it have been to go by ab visibility, for me, not useful. For someone else, perhaps they only see their abs when they're close to 10%. All depends on the person, how built their abs are, how they store fat, etc. Too much variation for my liking to go by that alone..

This is the difference between you and I. You are extremely detail focused. I'm more big picture.
I don't think there's wrong or right here. Just different shades of mind fuckededness  :D.
"Train as hard as possible, as often as possible, while staying as fresh as possible"
- Zatsiorsky

entropy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1684
  • b00m!
  • Respect: +276
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2342 on: August 14, 2014, 06:29:33 am »
+1
This is the difference between you and I. You are extremely detail focused. I'm more big picture.
I don't think there's wrong or right here. Just different shades of mind fuckededness  :D.

I thought I was the one taking the holistic approach :) I'm looking at more than just the outline of abs popping thru some adipose as a signal to stop cutting. But i'm done with this discussion/debate, it's utterly pointless so i'm bowing out. No ones mind will be change today or ever, you gotta learn the hard way and then it's always obvious that the best advice was the one we didn't want to contemplate. Been there done that, even as recently as  2 months ago  ("i see my abs, i'll be 10% by 80kg fo sho" ...).   
Goals: Cutting to 6-8% bodyfat

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14566
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2343 on: August 14, 2014, 07:57:04 am »
0
So can I still eat my Nutella? That's what I want to know.

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12856
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7961
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2344 on: August 14, 2014, 10:41:07 am »
0
i definitely never said anything about zigging and zagging. your diet, if you are trying to gain or lose weight, should be different on days you train vs. days you don't. but unless you're going for rapid fat loss or keto or something like that then you should be pretty steady over time.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2345 on: August 14, 2014, 12:29:40 pm »
+2
But i'm done with this discussion/debate, it's utterly pointless so i'm bowing out. No ones mind will be change today or ever, you gotta learn the hard way and then it's always obvious that the best advice was the one we didn't want to contemplate.

Very much disagree with the first part ( useless debate ) , love the last part ( best advice is the one you didn't follow ).
Those debates are always very useful, as long as you see them as training philosophy and understanding evaluation/readjustment and not internet flame wars that you have to convince the  world you are right and everyone else is wrong. Not saying you do that, talking generally. In our case, you are right that you can't convince me to go to 8% to bulk again and i can't convince you to start bulking right away. But maybe you have planted a seed in my mind and i will not start at 14-15% but try to get a little lower , like 12-13. And maybe i did the same to you, maybe you will not wait to go to 70kg/8% but start a bit higher, like 75/10. And that would most probably be very much beneficial for both of us. It is a try and catch process, chasing the 'golden mean'.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12856
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7961
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2346 on: August 14, 2014, 12:56:26 pm »
0
This is the difference between you and I. You are extremely detail focused. I'm more big picture.
I don't think there's wrong or right here. Just different shades of mind fuckededness  :D.

I thought I was the one taking the holistic approach :) I'm looking at more than just the outline of abs popping thru some adipose as a signal to stop cutting. But i'm done with this discussion/debate, it's utterly pointless so i'm bowing out. No ones mind will be change today or ever, you gotta learn the hard way and then it's always obvious that the best advice was the one we didn't want to contemplate. Been there done that, even as recently as  2 months ago  ("i see my abs, i'll be 10% by 80kg fo sho" ...).

i don't think it's pointless, although sometimes debating with you can be frustrating because you're so committed to your own idiosyncratic interpretation of things. you're a bit like avishek used to be with his batshit insane exercises, but for nutrition/diet. and that guy was OUT THERE on diet, too, back in the day. he went all raw foods for a while.

what you do works for you pretty well, although you do yo-yo kind of a lot weight-wise. so keep doing your thing, but please don't get frustrated when other people argue against the way you interpret nutrition and diet information. it's not even that you're wrong necessarily -- i don't think anyone on here, except t0ddday during his drop-ins, is enough of an expert to say that with real backed-up confidence; we're all just interpreting what we read, too -- just that the way you read things and claim they should be applied is convoluted and strange and the rest of us just seem to process things a bit more straightforwardly and don't take things to such extremes.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

Coges

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3107
  • Respect: +2267
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2347 on: August 14, 2014, 11:55:08 pm »
0
Good convo all round. Definitely made me think but not sure I'll change much.
Either way, it'll either work or it won't and I hope whatever we're doing works for all of us.
"Train as hard as possible, as often as possible, while staying as fresh as possible"
- Zatsiorsky

entropy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1684
  • b00m!
  • Respect: +276
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2348 on: August 15, 2014, 12:00:48 am »
0
Yeah but todday was also adamant i was 8% bodyfat at 83kg and I shouldn't cut anymore :) It turns out the best judge is simply more data. Cut and you get more data,  better learning about your true bodyfat level, and eventually you'll come close to the truth. The higher your bodyfat the less accurately (and precisely too - for that matter!) you know your true bf%. I fully understand that sometimes things I claim (mostly about myself) fly counter to intuition. That's the part I love the most, secretly, that I can get myself into this situations where reason and logic need to be super sharp to evaluate my claims instead of just plain common sense (which is far more blunt) but needs to be accompanied with critical thinking to work out where the edge cases lie.
Goals: Cutting to 6-8% bodyfat

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2349 on: August 25, 2014, 06:08:20 am »
+2
Aaaaaand, i am back! :D

Body composition measurements:

Net morning weight : 82.2kg / 181.2lbs , season low , :wowthatwasnutswtf:
Waist : 86cm / 33.85'' , ties all time lowest measurement ,  :wowthatwasnutswtf:

Online bodyfat estimation : 15% , ties all time  lowest measurement ,  :wowthatwasnutswtf:
BI scale bodyfat estimation : 14.8% , not 100% sure but this also has to be all time  :personal-record: , :wowthatwasnutswtf:
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : 14.9% , broke under 15% on this average value ,  :personal-record::wowthatwasnutswtf:

Previous:
Net morning weight : 82.4kg / 181.6lbs , same with last time, ties season low!!!
Waist : 86cm / 33.85'' ,  new all time  :personal-record: , broke the 34'' barrier  :wowthatwasnutswtf:

Online bodyfat estimation : 15%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : n/a
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : n/a

Not bad at all for not having done anything even moderately challenging for 3 weeks.

Ok, NEW SEASON. Still thinking about it.
Want to change things around a bit. Not gonna bulk for now, will stick to what i said, attempt to stay at this BW and get stronger/leaner.
Gonna start with GPP style gym, then switch to volume-intensity alternating. I want  to be 'athletically functional' all year round this time, as opposed to the previous years tactics ( bulk to 92+kg / ~20% bf all winter, neglect running & jumping, start cutting and jumping in the spring ). I will try to go out and do sprints and jumps and bball stuff as often as possible. As i also said, there is also the option/possibility of joining a track&field team, but gotta contact them to learn more. I would like to have a great bball endurance this year, i want to be able to use my -whatever mediocre- strength and jumping ability all around the game, not for the first 10 mins, lol. So what i was thinking was to use more bball sessions, instead of going out and doing tempos and jumps and sprints, go and do up-tempo bball practice. Maybe start with that, give some rest and then do some ME jumps/sprints for a finisher.
Dunno, will see , still trying to set it up in my mind.

:lololol:
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2350 on: August 25, 2014, 03:12:09 pm »
0
25 August 2014

Bodyweight@session : ~83.5kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : weird random pain at left... plantaris? see description later.

-45 minutes of bball stuff ( dribbling, shooting, layups etc ). Including a couple of hard tomahawks on the 9'6'' rim.  8)
Tons of fatigue, tons of sweat, aeons out of shape. Expected.

ME JUMPS:
SLRVJ : ~26''
SVJ : ~26''
Dropstep : ~28''
1-step DLRVJ : ~29''
2-steps DLRVJ : ~29''
3-steps DLRVJ : ~29''
-Best i could get was wrist at 9'8'' rim. Not too bad, not too good. Uncoordinated and stiff at runups. Expected.

ME SPRINTS:
3x80m : 13.2 , 12.5 , 12.2
2x100m : 16.2 , 16.1
-Again uncoordinated, all good up to 50-60m but maintaining top speed felt too unnatural and tiring at the same time. Expected too.

Overall though, jumps are ~1-2 inches lower and sprints ~1 second slower than pre-holidays PRs. So it was rather good.

Now, the pain, i get this random sharp ( but not too intense ) pain on my left leg, right under the knee, at the back side. It appeared randomly during holidays too, can't find what triggers it. Also it is not daily, it disappears and reappears after 3-4 days, once, then leaves again. Today it didn't bug at all during bball and dunks and jumps, it appeared at the 80m sprints ( only at acceleration phase, not at top speed ) and disappeared again at the 100m sprints. Any ideas what it could possibly be, anyone?
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14566
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2351 on: August 25, 2014, 06:06:39 pm »
0
Offtopic question, but why can't greeks pronounce "sh"?

As in Porsche? And they use "S" instead?

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12856
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7961
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2352 on: August 25, 2014, 06:12:26 pm »
+1
presumably because the sound doesn't exist in greek? many, many nonnative english speakers can't say "th" and substitute "t" "d" or "z" instead.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14566
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2353 on: August 25, 2014, 06:45:32 pm »
0
Yeah but if I hear you say the sound, I can/should be able to do it.

I mean, if you say Porsche, or if you say "shhhhhhhh" as in to "make silence", it's not that hard to do, right? I just ... don't get it.

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12856
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7961
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2354 on: August 25, 2014, 07:02:18 pm »
0
Yeah but if I hear you say the sound, I can/should be able to do it.

I mean, if you say Porsche, or if you say "shhhhhhhh" as in to "make silence", it's not that hard to do, right? I just ... don't get it.

maybe, with lots of practice. if sounds in other languages were easy to say, no one would speak languages other than their native ones with an accent. i bet you $10 you don't speak english without a detectable nonnative speaker accent.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter