Author Topic: Age vs VO2max  (Read 983153 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1665 on: November 28, 2012, 02:46:57 pm »
0
^^^^^
Hahahahahah , loled IRL!!!
Nothing impressive though, don't forget i am ~195lbs. Also they are 16'' flexed, relaxed they are ~14,5''
Ive been very consistent with upper this season, Monday seated rows + Wednesday curls + Friday chinups seal the deal.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1666 on: November 29, 2012, 05:48:05 am »
0
Cutting evaluation after 4 weeks:

Week 1:
Starting weight : 196
Average Kcal/day consumed : 1950
Average Kcal/day on workout days : 2050
Average Kcal/day no workout days : 1850
Final weight : 198 ( +2 )

Week 2:
Starting weight : 198
Average Kcal/day consumed : 1720
Average Kcal/day on workout days : 1780
Average Kcal/day no workout days : 1675
Final weight : 194,5 ( -3,5 )

Week 3:
Starting weight : 194,5
Average Kcal/day consumed : 2015
Average Kcal/day on workout days : 2125
Average Kcal/day no workout days : 1850
Final weight : 195 ( +0,5 )

Week 4:
Starting weight : 195
Average Kcal/day consumed : 1935
Average Kcal/day on workout days : 2050
Average Kcal/day no workout days : 1850
Final weight : 194,5 ( -0,5 )

Comments :
Something went wrong in the 1st week that skewed my results and decisions. Water retention or sth caused an unjustified weight increase. It was linear all week too , not jsut a random high-weight spike. On the 2nd week loss was too big but that was coming from the weird 198 of week 1. So wrong big increase on week 1 , wrong big decrease in week 2.
Finally it looks like it's stabilised and reacting linealy and 'logically' the last 2 weeks. It looks like 2000 average ( ~2100 on workout days , ~1850 other ) has me on maintenance.
Why i didn't loose weight those 2 weeks? I wasn't consistent with my plan , i was supposed to consume 1900 on workout days and 1700 on others, i am 150-200 kcals off.
Next step : retry week 2's diet ( ~1800 on workout days , ~1600 on others ) and see what happens.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1667 on: December 01, 2012, 09:02:21 am »
0
1 December 2012

Bodyweight@session : ~194
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none?

Lance's 3-set-progress template - workout #13

FRONT SQUATS:
8@121 lbs ( +3 reps )
8@121 lbs ( +3 reps )
8@121 lbs ( -2 reps )
Total = 24 reps ( +4 reps )
-Great but exhausting.

STANDING OHP:
7@93,5 lbs ( +1 rep )
6@93,5 lbs ( same )
6@93,5 lbs ( same )
Total : 19 reps ( +1 rep )
-Very hard.

DEAD HANG CHINUPS:
8@BW+11lbs  ( same )
7@BW+11lbs  ( +1 rep )
7@BW+11lbs  ( +1 rep )
Total = 22 ( +2 reps )
-Very hard here too.

-Upper body was hard. Maybe deficit is catching up with me. Or just a weak day. We will see.
-Quad has not been bugging at all the last 3 days. No quad bugging at all during squats today too. Let's see what happens tomorrow.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2012, 09:20:35 am by vag »
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1668 on: December 03, 2012, 01:52:38 pm »
0
3 December 2012

Bodyweight@session : ~194
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none?

Lance's 3-set-progress template  - workout #14

SQUATS:
5@154 lbs ( +22 reps ) , ( -5 reps )
5@154 lbs ( +22 reps ) , ( -3 reps )
5@154 lbs ( +22 reps ) , ( -3 reps )
Total : 15 reps ( -11 reps )
-Upped intensity, lowered volume. No quad bugging , want to see how quad responds to that.
Last week's estimated 1RMs for the 3 sets were 176-164-164, today they are 173-173-173 so progress!

BENCH PRESS:
6@148,5 lbs ( +1 rep )
5@148,5 lbs ( same )
5@148,5 lbs ( same )
Total : 16 ( +1 rep )
-Very hard , pretty much my limit strength.

SEATED CHEST SUPPORTED MACHINE ROWS:
9@154 lbs ( +1 rep )
8@154 lbs ( same )
8@154 lbs ( same )
Total : 25 ( +1 rep )
-Very hard, limit strength levels here too.

Long lower body stretch.

-Same comments with last time , feels like quad is healing good, also feels like deficit is catching up with me.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1669 on: December 05, 2012, 02:57:10 pm »
0
Quad has been really good lately. Today after a long time i was able to do box pistol squats without any bugging.
I like a lot how it feels and i don't intend to roll back to that endless half-injured cycle so i will keep rehabbing.
Today : long lower body stretch routine, legs afterwards = jello.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12856
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7961
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1670 on: December 05, 2012, 03:10:19 pm »
0
Quad has been really good lately. Today after a long time i was able to do box pistol squats without any bugging.
I like a lot how it feels and i don't intend to roll back to that endless half-injured cycle so i will keep rehabbing.
Today : long lower body stretch routine, legs afterwards = jello.

 :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang: :headbang:
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1671 on: December 06, 2012, 01:33:14 pm »
0
^^^
AELSqwad FTW!

6 December 2012:

More rehab:

ATG FRONT SQUATS:
10@BW
10@BW+10kg
10@BW+20kg
10@BW+20kg

IT band foam rolling.

Long lower body stretching.

I was supposed to do RDLs+TKEs+arms yesterday and front squats+OHP+chinups tomorrow , did this today and will join the lifting days in a RDL+TKE+OHP+chinups on Saturday.
2nd squat session of the week =  :gtfo:
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1672 on: December 08, 2012, 07:38:16 am »
0
8 December 2012

Bodyweight@session : ~192,5  :headbang:
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none?

Lance's 3-set-progress template - workout #15

ROMANIAN DEADLIFTS:
8@198 lbs ( +11 lbs ) , ( -2 reps )
7@198 lbs ( +11 lbs ) , ( same )
7@198 lbs ( +11 lbs ) , ( +1 rep )
Total : 22 reps ( -1 rep )
-Great , mixed grip rulezzz.

SINGLE LEG EXTENSIONS:
15@35 lbs each leg ( +10 lbs )
15@35 lbs each leg ( +5 lbs )
15@35 lbs each leg ( same )
15@35 lbs each leg ( same )
-Changed tempo to 4:0:4. Phased the iso top part out because it felt like it was all VMO, which not the reason i am doing those.

STANDING OHP:
8@93,5 lbs ( +1 rep )
7@93,5 lbs ( +1 rep )
6@93,5 lbs ( same )
Total : 21 reps ( +2 reps )
-Very hard but progress.

DEAD HANG CHINUPS:
8@BW+11lbs  ( same )
7@BW+11lbs  ( same )
7@BW+11lbs  ( same )
Total = 22 ( same )
-Too hard , no progress.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2012, 07:49:11 am by vag »
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1673 on: December 10, 2012, 02:51:14 pm »
+1
10 December 2012

Bodyweight@session : ~191,5  :headbang:
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none?

Lance's 3-set-progress template  - workout #16

SQUATS:
LEG PRESS MACHINE:
15@80 lbs each leg
15@80 lbs each leg
15@80 lbs each leg
15@80 lbs each leg
-Tempo = 4:0:4. Felt awesome.

BENCH PRESS:
7@148,5 lbs ( +1 rep )
6@148,5 lbs ( +1 rep )
6@148,5 lbs ( +1 rep )
Total : 19 ( +3 reps )
-Awesome considering decreasing bodyweight.

SEATED CHEST SUPPORTED MACHINE ROWS:
10@154 lbs ( +1 rep )
9@154 lbs ( +1 rep )
8@154 lbs ( same )
Total : 27 ( +2 reps )
-Awesome considering decreasing bodyweight here too.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1674 on: December 10, 2012, 05:22:54 pm »
0
Leg press? Nice. :D

What ROM? Full or partial?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1675 on: December 11, 2012, 03:48:16 am »
0
Leg press? Nice. :D

What ROM? Full or partial?

Full, thighs touching chest. I wanted a rehabing/strengthening alternative to leg extensions, this one felt better actually.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1676 on: December 11, 2012, 08:19:34 am »
0
Yup. Closed kinetic chain exercise. That's why I'm going with leg presses as well, but partial ROM. I need to really kick the shit out of my VMOs.

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1677 on: December 12, 2012, 02:01:01 pm »
0
12 December 2012

Bodyweight@session : ~191  :almostascoolasnyancat:
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none

Lance's 3-set-progress template - workout #17

ROMANIAN DEADLIFTS:
10@198 lbs ( +2 reps )
9@198 lbs ( +2 reps )
8@198 lbs ( +1 rep )
Total : 27 reps ( +5 reps )
-Awesome! 10@198 is new form :personal-record:

BICEPS EZ-BAR CURLS:
11@87 lbs ( +1 rep ):personal-record:
9@87 lbs ( same )
8@87 lbs ( same )
Total : 28 reps ( +1 rep )

TRICEPS PUSHDOWNS:
10@77 lbs ( same )
10@77 lbs ( same )
10@77 lbs ( same )
Total : 30 reps ( same )
-Better form than last time.

-Lower body stretching.

-Small progress in biceps and triceps but i missed last week's arms workout and i am 3,5 lbs lighter now so...  :headbang:
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34034
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +9111
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1678 on: December 12, 2012, 03:34:51 pm »
+1
# grep l-age-vs-vertical access.log|grep -i google|grep -i bot|awk -F ' ' '{print $1}'|sort|uniq|less
66.249.73.123
66.249.73.77

# grep l-age-vs-vertical access.log|grep -i google|grep -i bot|wc -l
762

 :personal-record:

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #1679 on: December 12, 2012, 04:31:23 pm »
+1
Cutting evaluation after 6 weeks:

Week 1:
Starting weight : 196
Average Kcal/day consumed : 1950
Average Kcal/day on workout days : 2050
Average Kcal/day no workout days : 1850
Final weight : 198 ( +2 )

Week 2:
Starting weight : 198
Average Kcal/day consumed : 1720
Average Kcal/day on workout days : 1780
Average Kcal/day no workout days : 1675
Final weight : 194,5 ( -3,5 )

Week 3:
Starting weight : 194,5
Average Kcal/day consumed : 2015
Average Kcal/day on workout days : 2125
Average Kcal/day no workout days : 1850
Final weight : 195 ( +0,5 )

Week 4:
Starting weight : 195
Average Kcal/day consumed : 1935
Average Kcal/day on workout days : 2050
Average Kcal/day no workout days : 1850
Final weight : 194,5 ( -0,5 )

Weeks 5 & 6:
Starting weight : 194,5
Average Kcal/day consumed : 1970
Average Kcal/day on workout days : 2230
Average Kcal/day no workout days : 1775
Final weight : 191 ( -3,5 )

Comments :
Big success on the last 2 weeks. As you see, average intake didn't change much, it actually increased, workout days income increased by ~200 kcals while no workout intake decreased by ~80kcals. The workout days average would be lower ( around 2100  ) but i had one day that i hit 3000 that skewed the results.
TL;DR version : although caloric intake was about the same i have achieved a linear loss the last 14 days.
What really changed was the quality of the kcals , i minimized carbs , oils , sweets and alcohol and replaced them with mostly protein plus a few complex carbs.
Glad this works, because i have a real hard time eating less than ~1800 on non workout days and ~2000 on workout ones.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?