Author Topic: Age vs VO2max  (Read 983688 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2145 on: May 22, 2014, 05:38:37 am »
0
What does 15:5 mean? 15.5 seconds?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2146 on: May 22, 2014, 07:04:20 am »
0
yes
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2147 on: May 22, 2014, 01:42:23 pm »
0
22 May 2014

Bodyweight@session : ???
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none

1 ½ hour full court basketball
Great endurance. Compromised from heat. Also got shin splints after about 1 hour in. Not too much but there.
Vert felt good to very good, but no rim jumps to report.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2148 on: May 23, 2014, 02:37:15 pm »
0
23 May 2014

Finally got my lazy ass down to foam roll and stretch the shit out of my legs. Took me more than an hour to complete my sequence.
Must do that much more often.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2149 on: May 23, 2014, 02:40:07 pm »
0
You managed to do foam rolling for more than an hour?

#amazedbyyourpatience

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2150 on: May 23, 2014, 02:43:17 pm »
+2
No no, my quads would open up in half if i did, lol.
It was about 1hour 15mins in total, foam rolling AND static stretching.
The foam rolling part was the first 15-20 minutes, the rest was an ultra-long stretching routine, holding about 2 minutes each hold.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2151 on: May 23, 2014, 02:48:19 pm »
0
Still commendable. I would get tired of holding the isometric position from which to stretch for that long.

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12856
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +7961
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2152 on: May 23, 2014, 03:26:27 pm »
0
i commend your extended foam rollering and stretching. good job, bro, indeed.  :goodjobbro:
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

https://www.savannahstate.edu/cost/nrotc/documents/Inform2010-thearmstrongworkout_Enclosure15_5-2-10.pdf

black lives matter

ChrisM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1880
  • Respect: +1370
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2153 on: May 24, 2014, 04:44:09 pm »
0
Props. My post work out stretching is usually 25-30mins. Half that on off days lol
Insert motivational quote here...

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2154 on: May 24, 2014, 06:23:51 pm »
0
Thanks all!
I guess the prolonged duration was kinda cumulative since I rarely do it, like once a month or worse.
Legs feel amazing the next day, I will say yet another time that I MUST stretch and foam roll frequently.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2155 on: May 24, 2014, 07:13:53 pm »
0
Ah... stretching... what a concept...

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2156 on: May 25, 2014, 09:05:33 am »
+1
24 May 2014

Bodyweight@session : ~86,75kg
Soreness : none
Injuries/aches : none

Kelly Baggett's simple periodization routine

PHASE II , Week 2/2

Session B:

18'' DEPTH JUMPS:
2x10
-Very very good.

RHYTHMIC 1/4 JUMP SQUATS:
5@20kg
5@25kg
5@30kg
5@35kg
5@25kg
5@20kg
-Very very good too.

HIGH BAR FULL SQUAT SINGLES @90%:
6x1@102,5kg
-Rest between reps ~2mins
-They felt very hard and slow but on video they looked easy and fast. Weird!

HORIZONTAL LEG PRESS CALVES 'RAISES':
10@470lbs ( +10 lbs )
10@470lbs ( +10 lbs )
10@470lbs ( +10 lbs )
-Very strong.

CHINUPS:
10@BW+10kg , ties  :personal-record:
8@BW+10kg ( +1 rep )
-Total reps  :personal-record:

DIPS:
9@BW ( +1 rep ):personal-record:
8@BW
-Total reps  :personal-record:
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2157 on: May 25, 2014, 09:40:48 am »
0
18 reps in 2 sets for chinups with +10 kg is really good

vag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
  • Respect: +3800
    • View Profile
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2158 on: May 26, 2014, 04:57:22 am »
+1
Thanks, it is my only semi-respectable lift, lol. Moving to BW+12,5kg next time.

Body composition measurements:

Net morning weight : 86,3kg / 190lbs
Waist : 89,25cm / 35,1''

Online bodyfat estimation : 16.7%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : 16.4%
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : 16.55%

Previous:
Net morning weight : 87kg / 191,5lbs
Waist : 90cm / 35,4''

Online bodyfat estimation : 17.2%
BI scale bodyfat estimation : 16.9%
AVERAGE bodyfat estimation : 17.05%

Progress!!! Just about to break the imperial system barriers of 190lbs BW and 35'' waist.
Progress is visible too. Not that i got shredded or something but i see new entries on the mirror: more toned bicep veins, deeper cut on shoulders, 2-pack when flexed.
It is going good, i am preserving strength and mass much better than in every other cut i have done.
I am determined to go lower than i initially said, I had 84-85kg as a barrier but no more, willing to approach 80kg now if it continues to be that efficient.
Target training paces (min/km), calculated from 5K PR 22:49 :
Easy run : 5:48
Tempo run : 4:50
VO2-max run :4:21
Speed form run : 4:02

---

it's the biggest trick in the run game.. go slow to go fast. it doesn't make sense until it smacks you in the face and you're like ....... wtf?

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Age vs Vertical
« Reply #2159 on: May 26, 2014, 05:21:34 am »
0
When is the last time you've been under 80 kg with a good strength level?