« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 97 98 [99]   Go Down

Author Topic: warpspeed to the new scenario  (Read 9395870 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2921
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1281
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1470 on: February 01, 2026, 08:14:46 am »
0
01-02-26

Run -- 10.00k, 1:07:08

Curls + laterals

Notes

The plodder returns. Somewhat to be expected with return of actual sessions + also doing leg training yesterday. Guess that the double on Friday was also two quicker runs. Anyway, still excited about training.

Meant to note yesterday, one other change I'll be making is to let pace for sessions on weekday mornings be a little slower if needed. Think I'm just not an early morning guy when it comes to running and maybe some of the grind previously was trying to hit 'fresh weekend' paces at 6.45 pre-food and caffeine.
Logged

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13381
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +8183
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1471 on: February 01, 2026, 10:06:50 am »
0
really interested to see how NSM works for you!
Logged
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2921
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1281
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1472 on: February 02, 2026, 04:07:23 pm »
0
02-02-26

Run -- 7.4k, 51:44

Notes

plodplodplod

Quote from: LBSS on February 01, 2026, 10:06:50 am
really interested to see how NSM works for you!

yeah, looking forward to it. I basically did it before but with less sensible load progression. While i'm not 100% sold on the 'this is the only kind of workout you need' aspect, I think the real point is 'don't burn yourself out, do some form of sensible load tracking, because that allows sensible load progression' which I 100% buy, and which aligns with how I organised my lifting when that was a focus. cba to think about periodisation, tapering, deloads etc, just find something that let's you progression and lock in to that.

This is the plan I made, look how simple!

Logged

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2921
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1281
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1473 on: February 03, 2026, 04:45:06 pm »
0
03-02-26

-- Run
- w/u
- 3 x (8' on, 2' off) [4:29 avg on]
- c/d

Total, 9.01k, 48:52

Notes

Took a while to warm into this. Average HR in the 150s for the reps, so probably a little easy, max HR 164. But fine to start easy while getting used to the routine and sessions again.
Logged

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2921
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1281
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1474 on: February 04, 2026, 03:48:45 pm »
0
04-02-26

Run -- 7.13k, 44:37

Lift -- chins, dips

Notes

Felt pretty good!
Logged

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2921
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1281
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1475 on: Today at 03:58:15 pm »
+1
05-02-26

-- Run
- w/u
- 6:30 @ SubT / 90s rest
- 4 x [1k @ SubT / 90s rest]
- c/d

Total 9.41k, 50:12

OL Calf Raise x a bunch

Notes

4:22 avg pace for the reps, 162 Avg HR, only briefly over 170. So just about nail on the head.

Thought I had selected the workout (meant to be 4 x 6' on / 90s off)  but turns out I accidentally was just in normal run mode. Worked out perfectly since this ended up being 23:58 at SubT when I was aiming for 24 mins.

Calf raises getting easy with +30kg so time to increase. Experience literally 0 pain in my left foot now doing them, which is hype. Still get occasional jabs here and there but basically a non issue now.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 97 98 [99]   Go Up
« previous next »