Author Topic: warpspeed to the new scenario  (Read 19685709 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3059
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1312
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1620 on: June 09, 2026, 01:38:29 pm »
0
09-06-26

Run
- w/u
- 3 x 2k (90") [4:20]
- c/d, including 3 x 15" uphill strides

10.96k, 56:26

Lift
OAC neg, dips, chins, calf raise, curls, laterals

Notes

_almost_ pain free, and the pain was lower than yesterday's. almost ready to be back to it properly. hype. do feel a little detrained --obvs central adaptations are still there but running specific felt meh. like hr was in mid-high 160s for a not very crisp pace. that'll come back quick thoguh.

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3059
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1312
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1621 on: June 10, 2026, 03:38:24 pm »
+1
10-06-26

Run -- 7.15k, 43:24
Cycle -- 17:28, 125 avg HR

Notes

0 pain, hype! and fastest easy run pace since the half, and no random twinges during the day. didn't expect that since yesterday was pretty much almost a full SubT workout + I did calves etc. Still did a split run/cycle just to keep it slow and steady on the return to 100% running, but feeling pretty hyped.

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3059
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1312
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1622 on: June 11, 2026, 04:22:47 pm »
0
11-06-26

Run
- w/u
- 6 x 1k (1'30") [4:18 avg]
- c/d with 3 x 15" strides

10.48k, 57:03

Lift -- chins, dips

Notes

decent decent

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3059
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1312
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1623 on: June 12, 2026, 01:06:36 pm »
0
12-06-26

Run -- 9.21k, 58:34

Notes

super windy again

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3059
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1312
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1624 on: June 13, 2026, 07:29:57 am »
0
13-06-26

Run
- w/u
- 10 x 3' (1') [4:09 avg]
- c/d (including 4 x 15" strides)

Total, 11.58k, 1:01:10

Lift -- chins, dips, RDL, reverse nordic, calves

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3059
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1312
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1625 on: June 14, 2026, 11:36:27 am »
0
14-06-26

Run -- 9.67k, 1:01:04
Cycle -- 49:46, 118 hr

Notes

Fatigue above fitness for the first time since the half, woop woop

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3059
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1312
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1626 on: June 15, 2026, 03:40:54 am »
0
15-06-26

Run -- 9.19k, 58:03

Notes

second half of the run like 30s/k faster than the first half with same HR. sometimes kind of feel like the difference (for me) between running 6:30 and 6:00 isn't actually energy output but just like locking into a different form/style of running that is just more efficient/less sloppy?

Joe

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3059
  • Goobernatorial
  • Respect: +1312
    • View Profile
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1627 on: Today at 12:53:09 pm »
0
16-06-26

AM
Run
- w/u
- 3 x 10' (1') [4:18 avg]
- c/d (with 3 x 20s strides)
Total, 11.57k, 58:56

1 x OAC neg each arm

PM
Cycle - 30 mins, 130 avg HR
Lift - OAC neg, chins, dips, curls, laterals

Notes

best session since the half by a good margin. this was roughly the pace i was hitting pre-half (and then typically in plated shoes, these in unplated 'super trainers'). bit of lower leg complaints, though. think i will try to be more conservative in combined volume of strides + calf work, especially midweek. strides on day, calf work the other, then both on saturday, build up over time.

had a bunch of unexpected free time so a nice little double. Cycle was at usual easy settings, and same cadence etc, but decided to do it without fan. So first half was ~123-5ish avg HR then once I got hot the back half was close ~135 for 10 mins and then ~140 for last 5 mins. Same effort! breathing rate also unchanged. pretty cool. probably would benefit from doing a bit more heat stuff, since it's like pretty clearly a way to directly improve vo2 max via blood volume/red blood cells. bit miserable though.

reread bits of john davis's book. pretty convincing on the 4 determinants of endurance performance. that's part of why i'm trying to be consistent with calf/stride work, as an easy thing to do for running economy. kind of convinced i should do a bit more vo2 max work. just under 14 weeks out from the next half. so maybe a vo2 block is on the cards, if my tendons are willing to do that. i say a vo2 block since i convert from 5k to half pretty well (both races I was within 30-60s of what vdot says)...

eta: rip, didn't get a spot in the berlin half, trying out lottery for another london one that people like around the same time
« Last Edit: Today at 03:37:32 pm by Joe »

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13530
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +8232
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Reply #1628 on: Today at 04:59:53 pm »
0
does berlin do bib exchanges? could try to get in that way. my next half is also 14 weeks out, funnily enough.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek