Author Topic: Joint by joint vert  (Read 21383 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #45 on: August 14, 2012, 08:29:15 am »
0
Quote

His knees are moving? forward, they should't do that. Form is terrible.

MrBobcabob Acum 7 (de) luni

LanceSTS

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
  • Respect: +550
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/LanceSTS
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #46 on: August 14, 2012, 03:15:33 pm »
0
Quote

His knees are moving? forward, they should't do that. Form is terrible.

MrBobcabob Acum 7 (de) luni

Cults, wonderful on the outside but on the inside are very manipulating. Cult leaders are desperate to trick you into joining. They are after your obedience, your time and your money.

Cults use sophisticated mind control and recruitment techniques that have been refined over time. Beware of thinking that you are immune from cult involvement, the cults have millions of members around the world who once thought they were immune, and still don't know they are in a cult! To spot a cult you need to know how they work and you need to understand the techniques they use. Teaching you these things is what this article is all about.

This article exposes the secret techniques cults will use to try and trick and control you. Cult leaders will not want you to read this, but read it anyway. Once you understand How Cults Work you will be better able to spot and avoid cult recruiters, and protect your family and friends.
Relax.

LanceSTS

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
  • Respect: +550
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/LanceSTS
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #47 on: August 14, 2012, 03:27:11 pm »
0
A cult will have a slick well-rehearsed Public Relations front which hides what the group is really like. You will hear how they help the poor, or support research, or peace, or the environment. They will tell you how happy you will be in their group (and everyone in the cult will always seem very happy and enthusiastic, mainly because they have been told to act happy and will get in trouble if they don't). But you will not be told what life is really like in the group, nor what they really believe. These things will be introduced to you slowly, one at a time, so you will not notice the gradual change, until eventually you are practicing and believing things which at the start would have caused you to run a mile.


 cult leaders will tell you can only be "saved" (or can only be successful) in their organization alone. No other organization has the truth, all others miss the mark. So it is not the belief system that decides your future, but it the belief system AND your membership with that particular group.

Be very suspicious of any group that claims to be better than all the others. A religious group may say that other groups following the same religion are OK, but they are the ones who have a better grasp of the truth and they are superior to the rest. This is often just a subtle version of exclusivism.

Cult leadership is feared. To disagree with leadership is the same as disagreeing with God. The cult leaders will claim to have direct authority from God to control almost all aspects of your life. If the cult is not a religious group then questioning the leaders or program will still be seen as a sign of rebellion and stupidity.

Those who control the information control the person. In a mind control cult any information from outside the cult is considered evil, especially if it is opposing the cult. Members are told not to read it or believe it. Only information supplied by the cult is true. One cult labels any information against it as "persecution" or "spiritual pornography", another cult calls it "apostate literature" and will expel you from the group if you are caught with it. Cults train their members to instantly destroy any critical information given to them, and to not even entertain the thought that the information could be true.

One of the most common forms of commercial cults is the pressure selling organization. These groups ostensibly make money by selling goods via their sales organization, but in reality they make their money by selling goods and motivational materials to their sales organization. Using mind control they seek to enlarge and maintain their sales force, and hence their profits.

« Last Edit: August 14, 2012, 03:33:58 pm by LanceSTS »
Relax.

LanceSTS

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
  • Respect: +550
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/LanceSTS
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #48 on: August 14, 2012, 03:42:20 pm »
+1
Quote

 
Relax.

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #49 on: August 14, 2012, 03:45:47 pm »
0
Quote

His knees are moving? forward, they should't do that. Form is terrible.

MrBobcabob Acum 7 (de) luni

Cults, wonderful on the outside but on the inside are very manipulating. Cult leaders are desperate to trick you into joining. They are after your obedience, your time and your money.


Yeah, I mean - look what's going on in the hole... "The Church of Starting Strength"? I mean seriously...

T0ddday

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1343
  • Respect: +1114
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #50 on: August 14, 2012, 04:36:11 pm »
0
I think the same applies in terms of deadlifts vs squats.

That's why some people have such good deadlift numbers and such poor squat numbers, especially if they high bar squat - you can't cheat using the lowerback as much in the squat as you can in the deadlift.

So obviously people with great lowerback strength but weak leg strength will deadlift much more than they can squat. Think Mutombo on this forum.

That's a great point.  I know I am a little late to the party but I don't know why Steven thinks you can't use your back to a large degree in squats and deadlifts.  Mutumbo's problem is actually common in track athletes (I think he has a sprinting background) who develop pretty intense isometric back strength but generally don't put their quads through a full range of motion until they get to the weight room.  I trained with a 135lb triple jumper who could easily deadlift 440lbs and powerclean 250lbs but couldn't squat 315 to save his life.   Long legs short torso and strong back and glutes will make an athlete find a way to perform every lift without using his quads. 

That said it's really all about the individual and the individuals athletic background.  Qualifying that you perform the lifts with "correct form" is somewhat silly IMHO because ideally compound strength lifts should be performed with the technique that allows you to lift the most weight safely, not the form that makes you "feel the burn" in your quads.  Lifting with form which doesn't allow you to handle the most weight you can makes an exercise lose it's usefulness as a measuring stick for strength improvement.

For me this involves performing a lot of front squats.  I first started squatting and powercleaning (using my back almost completely) in college as part of poor strength and conditioning program for sprinting,  I have deadlifted 560 at 195 without focusing on the lift and when I perform high-bar pause squats with more than 365 pounds on the bar I often end up turning the lift into a hybrid squat/good morning about halfway up.  My back is strong enough that holding my torso erect on the front squat is never the challenge (my weak quads and hamstrings are). 

Raising my max front squat triple from 275 to 325 over the last 6 months has done more for my quads than backsquatting would have.  Additionally, I am now able to perform pause back squats with more weight with less goodmorninish form.  I've raised my max standing vertical from about 34 to 36.5 inches as well despite gaining about 10lbs.   

Don't know if it's made me faster... Really don't believe weight training has that much carryover past about 50 meters and before 50 meters it's only tenths or hundreds of seconds that can be improved anyway.   

The point is... Maybe I could have made the same gains doing Low-Bar back squat with the form Steven prescribed, ie. trying to keep my torso upright and making my LBBS look more like a vertical movement.... But this would have been extremely difficult and hard to accomplish especially when dealing with fatigue.  Front squats allow an athlete with my characteristics to get to the weight room, throw some weight on the bar, try and lift as much as possible, and get stronger legs which carryover to things like vertical jumping.  That's a huge advantage IMHO. 

steven-miller

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 879
  • Respect: +63
    • View Profile
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #51 on: August 14, 2012, 06:23:52 pm »
0
That's a great point.  I know I am a little late to the party but I don't know why Steven thinks you can't use your back to a large degree in squats and deadlifts.

So once again.

In order for the back to do actual work against the bar, the back muscles have to perform a concentric contraction that leads to the bar going up. This is not something that typically happens in back squats of any kind. If there is any significant movement of the back it is usually during the phenomenon idiotically referred to as "butt-wink". Meant with that term is a failure to keep the lumbar spine in extension at the bottom of the squat. But while a concentric contraction of the erectors takes place, this movement is not transmitted to the upper back because "butt-wink" is just moving the pelvis around, not lifting the weight. Therefore this type of back movement cannot be responsible for the completion of the rep. The whole work therefore gets accomplished by the legs, which therefore get trained.

The only instance the back would be able to lift the weight is during a good-morning-ish rep that includes a rounded back, that gets straightened at lock-out. This might sometimes be done but if it is, it is incredibly rare. I have yet to see it done in the gyms I frequent and I see a lot of idiotic shit there.

In the deadlift backs are more likely to contribute to the work against the barbell.  

That said it's really all about the individual and the individuals athletic background.  Qualifying that you perform the lifts with "correct form" is somewhat silly IMHO because ideally compound strength lifts should be performed with the technique that allows you to lift the most weight safely, not the form that makes you "feel the burn" in your quads.  Lifting with form which doesn't allow you to handle the most weight you can makes an exercise lose it's usefulness as a measuring stick for strength improvement.

That is a weird way to look at it since deviations from formerly correct form happen in nearly every exercise over the course of the training progression. And while some of those deviations are relatively safe and allow, for the moment, the completion of a rep or set that would otherwise have been failed, it would be a mistake not to correct these things. The reason is precisely the usefulness of the exercise as a measuring stick for strength improvement. If form is not constant, there is no way one can reasonably account all progress on strength improvements. A good example would be increases in lower back rounding over the course of several deadlift sessions.


The point is... Maybe I could have made the same gains doing Low-Bar back squat with the form Steven prescribed, ie. trying to keep my torso upright and making my LBBS look more like a vertical movement.... But this would have been extremely difficult and hard to accomplish especially when dealing with fatigue.  Front squats allow an athlete with my characteristics to get to the weight room, throw some weight on the bar, try and lift as much as possible, and get stronger legs which carryover to things like vertical jumping.  That's a huge advantage IMHO.  

I think you read the thread wrong. I never advised the LBBS to be performed with a very vertical back, that was Lance. I think a more horizontal back is what actually makes you get more out of it because of the reasons discussed extensively in this thread. I did not advise to do good-mornings though.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2012, 06:25:59 pm by steven-miller »

LanceSTS

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
  • Respect: +550
    • View Profile
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/LanceSTS
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #52 on: August 14, 2012, 06:29:50 pm »
0

I think you read the thread wrong. I never advised the LBBS to be performed with a very vertical back, that was Lance. I think a more horizontal back is what actually makes you get more out of it because of the reasons discussed extensively in this thread. I did not advise to do good-mornings though.


Not exactly what I said, I posted examples of squats, to show examples of squats that train the LEGS more, and that would correlate more to athletic movement, driven from the LEGS.
Relax.

steven-miller

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 879
  • Respect: +63
    • View Profile
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #53 on: August 14, 2012, 06:36:07 pm »
0
Not exactly what I said, I posted examples of squats, to show examples of squats that train the LEGS more, and that would correlate more to athletic movement, driven from the LEGS.

Sorry for the misrepresentation.

TheSituation

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
  • Just remember me when I make it shine
  • Respect: +215
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #54 on: August 14, 2012, 06:58:56 pm »
+1
I can progress in Leg Presses and Barbell Hack Squats faster than Back Squats, does that make them better?

But then again Steven-Miller is a rippetard and thinks his opinion matters because he can squat 450+ pounds.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2012, 07:02:07 pm by TheSituation »
I don't lift for girls, I lift for guys on the internet



[7:31pm] adarq: ripp, being honest, it's hard for u to beat jcsbck, he's on fire lately
[7:31pm] adarq: he's just
[7:31pm] adarq: wrecking people
[7:31pm] adarq: daily




Say NO to Maroko

And also NO to anyone who associates with him. No Taylor Allan. No Adam Scammenauger. No Kelly Baggett. No Elliot Hulse. No Jtrinsey. NO JUMP USA


Don't PM me asking me training questions. I'm here for the lulz. If you want help, post on the forums and get help from all the members, maybe even me.

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #55 on: August 14, 2012, 07:07:19 pm »
0
I can progress in Leg Presses and Barbell Hack Squats faster than Back Squats, does that make them better?

But then again Steven-Miller is a rippetard and thinks his opinion matters because he can squat 450+ pounds.

I can leg press 660 lbs. Does that mean my opinion matters too?!

AWESOME! :highfive:

TheSituation

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
  • Just remember me when I make it shine
  • Respect: +215
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #56 on: August 14, 2012, 07:10:20 pm »
0
I can progress in Leg Presses and Barbell Hack Squats faster than Back Squats, does that make them better?

But then again Steven-Miller is a rippetard and thinks his opinion matters because he can squat 450+ pounds.

I can leg press 660 lbs. Does that mean my opinion matters too?!

AWESOME! :highfive:

He's probably going to respond by insulting me. Somehow that will give his opinion more credibility. He thinks his opinion is important because he increased his squat and jump by a certain amount. That's nice. If I increase my leg press by 400 pounds I'm going to jump higher. Does that make it optimal?

This is the same guy who said half squats are useless because he did them for a month and increased his half squat but couldn't jump any higher, completely ignoring that neural adaptations were responsible for his gains and not muscle gains. The irony of this is he kisses Rippetoe's ass when Rippetoe's entire program is based on this concept. You think you actually put enough more muscle mass every 2 days to squat 5-10 more pounds? No, you're just getting used to/getting better at squatting.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2012, 07:19:05 pm by TheSituation »
I don't lift for girls, I lift for guys on the internet



[7:31pm] adarq: ripp, being honest, it's hard for u to beat jcsbck, he's on fire lately
[7:31pm] adarq: he's just
[7:31pm] adarq: wrecking people
[7:31pm] adarq: daily




Say NO to Maroko

And also NO to anyone who associates with him. No Taylor Allan. No Adam Scammenauger. No Kelly Baggett. No Elliot Hulse. No Jtrinsey. NO JUMP USA


Don't PM me asking me training questions. I'm here for the lulz. If you want help, post on the forums and get help from all the members, maybe even me.

T0ddday

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1343
  • Respect: +1114
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #57 on: August 14, 2012, 07:23:18 pm »
0

That is a weird way to look at it since deviations from formerly correct form happen in nearly every exercise over the course of the training progression. And while some of those deviations are relatively safe and allow, for the moment, the completion of a rep or set that would otherwise have been failed, it would be a mistake not to correct these things. The reason is precisely the usefulness of the exercise as a measuring stick for strength improvement. If form is not constant, there is no way one can reasonably account all progress on strength improvements. A good example would be increases in lower back rounding over the course of several deadlift sessions.


My point isn't that we shouldn't attempt to keep form constant, it's that we shouldn't plan a program around a lift that an athlete can safely lift drastically more with a slight deviation in form which changes the prime movers.  That's why even though RDLs and Glute-Thrusts are excellent ways to build strength they are usually performed as assistance exercises for higher rep counts after the primary lifts are completed; because adding 5 pounds a week to your 3-rep RDL could be achieved with progressively more lumbar involvment and less hamstring recruitment; which is the main goal of the movement.  

One reason compound lifts are so great in a program is that a focus on increasing the load will result in increased strength in one of the muscle groups used; which will lead to increases in athletic performance.  As you said, this may be the weak link getting stronger (ie. a quad dominant athlete might initially build strength primarily in the hamstrings from squatting) initially, but will eventually require all the muscle groups to get stronger.

Thus my point is... although you find it hard to believe... A lot of hip dominant athletes with strong backs (such as many track and field athletes or every american football kid who does tons of powercleans with poor form) will turn the low bar squat into a modified good morning, which will rob the lift of it's usefulness as a lift to build strength in the legs... which is the goal.

The proof of this is that while you might not run into them in your gym their are athletes here who can low bar squat in excess of 500lbs but struggle with front squatting two plates.  You are not in this category... but the fact that it's possible to perform the lift in a manner which will rob it of it's carryover is troubling.

Obviously, you can rob yourself of real gains in other primary lifts, by raising your butt off the bench in bench press or not going to depth in squatting.... but the difference is those form changes are actually cheating and easy to watch for and prevent.  Athletes can perform legal depth low-bar squats that would get white lights in powerlifting meets by shifting a large amount of the load to their back... You can try and coach this away and enforce the athlete to have their hips rise slower and generate more leg drive... but why not just have an athlete attempt to move a load in a lift where the power has to come from the leg drive... like the front squat?   Part of being a good coach is that while you might have a preference for a lift like the LBBS, you should realize that their are exceptions whose progress will be better served with an exercise in which they can concentrate more solely on load lifted and be ready to prescribe an alternative for such athletes.

steven-miller

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 879
  • Respect: +63
    • View Profile
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #58 on: August 14, 2012, 07:50:44 pm »
0
You can try and coach this away and enforce the athlete to have their hips rise slower and generate more leg drive... but why not just have an athlete attempt to move a load in a lift where the power has to come from the leg drive... like the front squat?   Part of being a good coach is that while you might have a preference for a lift like the LBBS, you should realize that their are exceptions whose progress will be better served with an exercise in which they can concentrate more solely on load lifted and be ready to prescribe an alternative for such athletes.

I agree that there are exceptions in which another exercise can legitimately be used in place of the preferred one. But an athlete making an easy to correct form error does not qualify as such in my opinion.

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14565
  • Respect: +2486
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Joint by joint vert
« Reply #59 on: August 15, 2012, 02:17:45 am »
0
Speaking of leg pressing - why is it so "terrible"? I know, stabilization, fixed hips, 45 angle, why not squat? etc etc etc, but seriously - is it that bad if you say leg press + RDL or leg press + hip thrust?

The question is why would you not squat, but in the eventuality you can't squat/don't want to for whatever reason, is the leg press that terrible in combination with the right assistance exercises?