Adarq.org

I've been trying to not pay attention to too much stuff in the news n articles and what not.(even the one about the bill to confiscate "assault" weapons in georgia that failed)  I happened to notice though in the dem debate about Hillary all of a sudden approves of gay marriage....even though looking it up in 2004 she's basically saying god made adam and eve not adam and steve.  I don't know if she even knows who she is anymore considering shes a politician chameleon just saying whatever she thinks will attract voters.

Bernie has crazy ass hair but he would be waaay better than Hillary and her orange jump suit. 

Also, Bossaball looks amazing

daaamn she did say the "Adam and Steve" slogan once didn't she.. I think I remember her saying that. If so, foul.. I picture a toothless redneck saying that, not an educated woman. :f

edit: I couldn't find it, so she probably didn't say it. I really recall her saying that though. Maybe it was a comedy skit that my brain merged together. dno. weird.

edit #2: so as I was running... it came to me that Sarah Palin might have actually said that.. so the "not an educated woman" comment would definitely apply.



+1 if you find the clip on youtube.. I don't want to search for it, it's going to result in all kinds of weird recommendations on my youtube dashboard. lmfao.

pc

^That is interesting, never heard of that. Found it though.
This article here explains the situation well : http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/10/22/sometimes-estimating-is-better-than-getting-the-exact-answer/

Long story short, it is about estimating to avoid the exact calculation, so the 'reasonable' answer is the one you get doing the calculation on a larger scale.
The exact calculation is 100-25 = 75
The rough calculation is "around 100"-"around 30" = 70.
The meaning of the whole thing is to learn to do good estimations WITHOUT doing the exact calculation.

I agree with the article editor that the 25-100 pages example is not a good one to demonstrate the theory. Because 100-25 is already a pretty simple math core func.
103-28 is better.

Best demo is the one he uses about the prices total:

Suppose you’re buying groceries. You have four items in your cart that cost $1.99, $4.93, $6.03, and $5.14.
If all you have is $20 in your wallet, is that enough to pay for the items?
I think that’s a very realistic question.
It would take you at least a little bit of time to add up those numbers individually and get an exact number. Would it answer your question? Absolutely. But you don’t need an exact answer.
The smarter thing to do would be to simply round the numbers. We should be saying to ourselves, “2 + 5 + 6 + 5 equals 18… throw in some tax… and I should still be under $20.”

I can only speculate, and my speculation is that the concept of the specific college course ( or course section ) was that, avoiding the exact calculation, which the student didn't do.

Ooh ok, just seemed weird too me and they have the no student left behind which basically from my understand is as long as the student shows some kind of effort they wont get held back? idk I'm glad I'm outta school

In other news, the budweiser job that I talked about a few posts back well they picked me to go in and interview.  Around here if you get into budweiser you pretty much won the lottery, easy work with high pay soo I'm hoping this time it works out lol

MOVIE REVIEW TIME!!!!: Prescription Thugs

This movie had a bigger impact on me than Bigger Stronger Faster just for the fact that prescription drugs are just a normal every day thing for the majority of the population and kills a shit ton of people and yet someone takes steroids and they get burned at the cross.  There are quite a few stories in there from pro athletes who took prescription pills, Mike bells story and a story about a ex pharma reps niece who went cold turkey off of anti-psychotic drug aaand didn't end well.  It also goes into the business side of it and how Reagan and Saxophone Bill helped out big pharma, especially with advertising to the public.  Now him and Hillary are trying to ban public advertisements for guns but her and her husband approve of helping these companies brainwash people into thinking they have problems.

The Documentary is awesome, you can rent it on Itunes and we should send hillary and bill off into the ocean on a small piece of ice.

Fair enough.. I mean you really don't need to justify yourself. I just think that most of the stuff he says is just dumb and not viable. The fact that he seems to be teaming up with good old sarah doesn't increase his trustworthiness.

Bench, worked triples and then singles
225x3
250x3
275x2
then 305 for a single and it felt like 85-90%
      -Shoulders are still aching  which is why I only did a single

Incline DB press: 50/60/70 for sets of 10 with palms facing each other and extending to palms forward

Incline Db flyes: 30/40/50 for sets of 10

Lat pulldown tricep pushdowns: 5 sets working heavy then one light burn out set

walked for awhile

starting the new job site today which kinda sucks but oh well