Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Dreyth

Pages: 1 ... 113 114 [115] 116 117 ... 131
1711
MUSiC anD SHeeT! / Re: My friend's mashups
« on: June 17, 2011, 03:18:09 pm »
Damned dubstep! I like the lyrics from Sarah McLachlan's "Silence." And what's one of the songs called in the second mash-up? Melody sounds familiar.

My brother makes mash-ups too, I should post some but idn where he saves them.

1712
MUSiC anD SHeeT! / Re: old school trance
« on: June 13, 2011, 12:04:40 am »
Quote

I have a feeling I'll be the only poster in this thread (or not now that I said that [or I will now that I said that]).

u felt wrong bruh

my friend sent me above & beyond: group therapy album.. havn't listened to it yet, going to today when i dunk, looks promising though form youtube.

glowstix son.

pc



Dam.. the album kinda disappointed me, but their group therapy tour was phenomenal when I went to see them.

I like their slow songs from the album a lot though:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaXK1j7N-Mc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaXK1j7N-Mc</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGkX8gsMT7c" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGkX8gsMT7c</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se9yBvqQHxk" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se9yBvqQHxk</a>




buttttt i think their older slow/chillout songs kick ass more imo:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oz9fMIBGMMU" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oz9fMIBGMMU</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upA0Ba1Ul4A" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upA0Ba1Ul4A</a>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj7f6w-46_s" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xj7f6w-46_s</a>





And one last comment... I think the "Burning Bridges Mix" of "Thing Called Love" should have been a bonus track on the album. I like it better than the version they put on the album itself:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67PAFrS54eA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67PAFrS54eA</a>


1713
Now, you MIGHT have a point here, but only if you can propose a better model than the percentage based one. Go ahead.

I'll try.


Possible inches you can gain =
[ (70-SVJ) * 0.9 *SVJ ] /  3.2[ SVJ - 3 ]


I'm being kinda serious here. i did a few examples and it looks kinda accurate. SVJ = starting SVJ at 17 years old with no prior jump or weightlifting.

1714
Game 4: Wade was fucking ASTOUNDING. I think he's better than LBJ.

Game 5: SUP?

1715
My opinion is that half-squats are never a legitimate exercise for any purpose under any circumstances.

Any athlete that has a legit TRAINED 36-38" SVJ started out with a 30-32+.

I do not think partial squats are SPP. I think they are an ineffective way to train anything, because their mechanics are sufficiently different from normal human movement patterns that they are actually counterproductive.

You can't create "elite" jumping numbers (36"+) with any kind of squat if elite jumping genetics are not already there

And what the hell does bodyfat have to do with this as a training goal?

My rule of thumb in these matters is ABOUT 25% improvement in untrained vs trained SVJ, with emphasis on the S. I didn't make the goddamn percentages up -- they are the consensus of every high-level S&C coach I've talked to about this, every high-level athlete that has trained the SVJ for performance, and my own personal experience.

Half squats are used -- and their use rationalized in this way -- by coaches that do not know how to teach the full squat successfully, that have never disciplined themselves to learn and use the full squat personally, and that run typical shitty collegiate S&C programs that get by because their recruiters put enough genetics on the team that it looks like half-squats and Hammer Strength actually work.



- Mark Fucking Rippetoe

1716
"Any athlete that has a legit TRAINED 36-38" SVJ started out with a 30-32+. Show us your data, and show us the video of the jump test method you use."

- Mark Rippetoe



LOLLLLLLLLLL ok so if you have a 30" SVJ already you can only increase it by  6" LMFAO.. that's only a 20% increase in vert...


mind you, I've went from a 27" RVJ to now a 38" RVJ over a period of 4 years. Mark Rippetoe has ZERO knowledge when it comes to vert training. What a tool.

1717
HAHHHA GOMAD GOGGLES FOR THE WIN!!!

1718
honeybadger = adarqui?

1719
MOVIES & ENTERTAINMENT & SHeeT! / Re: Limitless
« on: June 04, 2011, 03:14:28 am »
That quote has been mis-quoted all the time. I always hear the 15% version of it...

I think the truth is that you only use 15% at a time.

1720
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: Adarq Dunk Mix
« on: June 04, 2011, 02:44:16 am »
PUNK!

hell yea... love how i feel the anticipation increase at around 2:30...

1721
If you are able to squat 90% of your 1 rep max 6 times then you are not explosive enough.

I can't.



Quote
This shows that you have a nervous system more geared toward strength than you do speed.  Because of this, you should focus more on speed and do less squatting or strength dominant exercises.

Possibly, but actually, I can't tolerate higher rep work (>5 reps). If my last rep on a squat slows down a little, there's a rare chance I can get more than an extra rep. I've been told that I'm pretty explosive in my squats: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMbuo7PetZw I need long pauses in between reps if I want to survive. Not only that, but in person, that 5th rep felt like HELL and there was NO WAY I coulda done another rep, yet some people thought I had another 2 or 3 in me.



Quote
The reason I say squat once a week is so you can feel fresh enough do plyo's and sprints 2-3 times a week.

Friday is a recovery squat workout. It will help me feel fresher. In addition, the wednesday workout looks like it wont hurt too much that it'll hinder my friday workout. Of course, I can auto-regulate that if I'm wrong.



Quote
 Since you will be losing weight, it is more draining on you to have to squat 3 times a week then it is to do low volume speed workouts.


Of course it will be, but that Friday recovery squat will not drain me whatsoever. I've done them before. Plus, even if it were a tiny bit draining, i have 2 days of rest after that, not 1.



Quote
Have you ever tried only lifting heavy once a week?  You think you will lose strength, but in actuality you will not.  If you are slightly overtrained than it is possible to make gains.

My experience tells me that squatting once a week makes me lose a bunch of poundage.... actually.... JUST THIS WEEK IT HAPPENED AND IT MAKES ME ANGRY  >:(

Friday (04/29/11)--------------Squat 335 x 5, 5, 5
Monday (05/02/11)------------Squat 340 x 5, 5, 5
Wednesday (05/04/11)--------Squat 315 x 1 (light day)
Friday (05/06/11) -------------Squat 345 x 5, 5, 5
Monday (05/09/11)------------Squat 350 x 5, 5, 5
Thursday (05/12/11) ----------Squat 355 x 5, 5, 5
Saturday (05/14/11) ----------Squat 315 x 1 (light day)
Tuesday (05/17/11) -----------Squat 360 x 5, 4, 3
Friday (05/20/11) --------------Squat 360 x 5, 5, 5
Sunday (05/22/11) ------------Squat  365 x 10sec, 10sec, 10sec, 10sec, 10sec (just unracks to feel the weight)
Tuesday (05/24/11) -----------Squat 365 x 5, 4, 3

Friday (05/27/11) --------------Squat 315 x 1 (light day)

Wednesday (06/01/11) --------Squat, 365 x 2, 1


Yep. High frequency has always been better for increasing my strength. Whenever I don't squat for about 4 or 5 days I always lose strength. In fact, the reason I did smolov jr for squats a while back was because I missed a few days of squatting and my squat PLUMMETED. And since high frequency works for me, smolov jr exploded my squat numbers up 80lbs in 9 weeks.

In my log snippets up there, notice the constant increasing weight as I squat about 3x a week, and then the drop in the number of times I can rep out 365lbs by the end when I squat less frequently. I went from 365x5 to 365x2 (420 1RM to 385 1RM) simply because I squatted heavy only once in that final week.


And these two cases are not the only times this has happened. There are others, but now I've learned my lesson.




Quote
If you lose strength, it will mainly be due to the fact that you're losing weight.  Trust me, if you cut to 185, (35 pounds in 1 summer) you will feel like complete shit, and the last thing you'll want to do is get your ass under a heavy bar 3 times a week.

I will probably feel like crap... my prediction is that I will auto-regulate a lot and lower the weight to 83% instead of 87% on Wednesdays. Actually, it would be better to switch my wed squat with fri squat since the wed is a little tougher, and i can lower the percentage like i said and have 2 days rest after it. then I should be good to go.


Quote
You will, however, feel much more agile and springy.  Take advantage of this by training for power and speed. Once you start eating at optimal levels again your gains will be significant.

  :personal-record: :personal-record: :personal-record: :personal-record: :personal-record:

1722
 I would assume that the arm swing should be timed in a way that you are overloaded in your eccentric phase but lighter in your concentric phase.

In that case, I would agree with adarqui... early swing time:

arms swing down = more weight while planting
arms swing up = less weight while rising

1723
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: How deep would you call this?
« on: May 30, 2011, 12:12:51 pm »
If full is only breaking parallel, than that's 1/3 squat.
If full is atg, then that's 1/4 squat.

Decide on "full squat" first!

First than, and then then?

I don't understand  :-\

1724
Pics, Videos, & Links / Re: How deep would you call this?
« on: May 29, 2011, 09:07:42 pm »
If full is only breaking parallel, than that's 1/3 squat.
If full is atg, then that's 1/4 squat.

Decide on "full squat" first!

1725
Basketball / Re: Trials
« on: May 28, 2011, 10:32:03 pm »
take 2,000 jumpshots and try to keep your form absolutely identical on every shot.

tomorrow you will be on fire.

Pages: 1 ... 113 114 [115] 116 117 ... 131