Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Raptor

Pages: 1 ... 420 421 [422] 423 424 ... 492
6316
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Squat vs Deadlift.
« on: February 22, 2011, 05:55:07 pm »
Yeah definitely. It's probably a good thing to limit your above parallel squats to later on, after you get a good strength base with full squats if you can do full squats safely though, since the more ROM and TUT, and less weight (for safety reasons) is a much better choice for beginners in my opinion. But once you have decent strength (1.5x+, maybe even 1.75x+) then you might get functional benefits from doing half squats or whatever depth you feel it's in the same ROM as your jumps, using the same stance as in a jump in terms of space between the feet etc.

If I wasn't weird enough already, I feel like I can full squat more easily 120 kg right now than I can half squat the same weight, because I reactively load and release better at that depth than at half squat depth. When I half squat 120 I feel my knees/quads overload, and the coupling phase is much slower than at full squat depth.

6317
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Squat vs Deadlift.
« on: February 22, 2011, 05:44:22 pm »
Why would there be differences? I understand than in a running VJ there are forward vectors of movement that determine different loads on different muscles than in a simple, stationary squat, but other than that? Maybe the fact that in a squat you stop at the top and not fully extend and leave the ground as in a jump, hence the hip extension (or hyperextension) part doesn't occur.

And yeah, I know what you say Andrew. You're basically choosing the same point in squat to go up as a VJ would have (at least for you). So basically it's repeating the same ROM, with the coupling phase in the squat occuring at the same depth as it would occur in the VJ (functional training).

But then you say
Quote
"so going deep is more of the quads not being able to do their job, which, at that depth, is of course not there job, it's the glutes job"

If that's true, then maybe we need to focus more on the quads so that they ARE able to to their job, so you bend less in a jump, spend less time on the ground, and all the positive influence these things have on a VJ. If that's true, then you're always going to be limited by the quads, since you don't need the glutes as much if any when you barely bend to 1/4 when you jump.

6318
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Squat vs Deadlift.
« on: February 22, 2011, 05:24:22 pm »
I've always wondered why are the glutes so important if they're not really activated unless you go very deep. I mean for jumping. If when you do a 1/4 squat you use mostly quads, and in a VJ you go into a 1/4 squat, shouldn't the recruitment be very similar (meaning - shouldn't the quads count very much and the glutes very little)?

6319
News, Announcements, & Suggestions / Re: Random adarq.org website news
« on: February 22, 2011, 10:15:37 am »
Well yeah, adarq.org has become a place where some retarded kids make fun of my name posting with anonymous nicknames and think that's so cool and funny. And that's lame as shit. People act like I'm a troll or something, or act like I'm doing "yo mama" jokes with people that I don't know. Then they somehow feel "superior" like they're "teaching me how to behave like a grown-up" while they act like silly little retards.

It would've been even if it wasn't me the target of these so called "attacks". I should know better than to care about this and I will limit my actions to discuss stuff that is really interesting and post in my log, and that's it. It was wasted time anyway so I actually should be greatful about that.

So, I understand what JON is saying, yet considering the current conditions, I don't give a shit anymore.

6320
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Squat vs Deadlift.
« on: February 22, 2011, 09:36:08 am »
To me, the shocking news is the vastus medialis results. Doesn't make any sense.

6321
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Buttocks
« on: February 22, 2011, 02:59:06 am »
Kelly, have you ever done or prescribed very heavy iso calf raises on the top of the movement? Like, hold for 30s with a 200 kg barbell on the back etc?.

Or how about seated iso calf raises?.

Those would pretty much target the soleus...

6322
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Buttocks
« on: February 21, 2011, 05:24:37 pm »
Kelly, have you ever done or prescribed very heavy iso calf raises on the top of the movement? Like, hold for 30s with a 200 kg barbell on the back etc?

6323
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Buttocks
« on: February 21, 2011, 04:57:15 pm »
No, I can't. I live in Romania. It's complicated here with cards and bands and stuff. I don't know any sports store that has bands for training by the way. And I don't think the powerjumper is deliverable in Romania, I think Jack Woodrup sent me the powerjumper himself or something like that.

And by the way, when I said "in the one-leg jump ROM" I meant - with the knee bent 20-26 degrees, so not in the full hip extension. I'd like to overload my amortization phase isometric position, which is knee and hip a little bent.

6324
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Hip flexors
« on: February 21, 2011, 04:53:55 pm »
Interesting. Well in my particular case, I already have incredible stride frequency in sprints, so my beef with the hip flexors would be to use them to pull the non-jumping leg's knee up better in a unilateral jump, so I need explosiveness with that and strength, so my leg is easier to pull up and therefore the movement is faster.

6325
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Buttocks
« on: February 21, 2011, 03:02:47 pm »
I still think of ways to overload the jumping leg isometrically in the same exact position as in a one-leg jump. Beats me a way to do it other than a isometric leg press hold in that ROM.

6326
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Hip flexors
« on: February 21, 2011, 02:57:28 pm »
Any comments on how would you personally train for that?

6327
Bruce Lee was a deep mo-fo alright.

6328
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Buttocks
« on: February 21, 2011, 11:27:47 am »
Well, he did say "changes the stiffness of human tendon-aponeurosis complex in knee extensors". In a hip thrust hold, there isn't too much knee extensor activity other than stabilizing etc.

6329
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Buttocks
« on: February 21, 2011, 10:10:02 am »
How about what I'm doing here:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMEH2u0N-lY" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMEH2u0N-lY</a>

The aim of that was just good ol' plain ISO strength. Rep time is ~20s.

6330
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: Buttocks
« on: February 21, 2011, 10:05:58 am »
If you don't overdo it, you're probably going to gain more by having a more glute driven squat than you'd lose by tendon stiffness adaptations, if any, that will occur in my opinion.

Pages: 1 ... 420 421 [422] 423 424 ... 492