Author Topic: Are you fucking kidding?  (Read 4475 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
Are you fucking kidding?
« on: April 21, 2010, 04:46:34 pm »
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2-SWEkN63A&playnext_from=TL&videos=Dj_8UtU7Q-M<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2-SWEkN63A" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2-SWEkN63A</a>

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31181
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +7696
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2010, 05:02:15 pm »
0
sick, i'd imagine he could hit about 12' or so.

nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2010, 05:05:23 pm »
0
how are all the combine vertical numbers inflated?

LBSS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11498
  • plugging away...
  • Respect: +6175
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2010, 06:09:41 pm »
0
Oh god I think my head just exploded. That was awesome.
Muscles are nonsensical they have nothing to do with this bullshit.

- Avishek

sunday: long very easy run 80+ mins @ 5:40+ (14+ km)
monday: strength/cross training
tuesday: easy run 60+ mins @ 5:20-5:30 (11+ km)
wednesday: fartlek (mostly easy pace with mix of strides, hills, long tempo) 45 mins (8+ km)
thursday: easy run 60+ mins @ 5:20-5:30 (11+ km), strength/cross-training
friday: rest
saturday: short tempo 6-8x500 @ sub-4:00 (7 km)

strength would be:
- hops 2x10
- box jumps or ME SVJ 2x5
- squats 3x6-8 or weighted BSS/lunges 3x10/leg
- RDL/hypers 2x10-12 or SLRDL 2x10-12/leg
- upper push myo-reps or sets to technical failure
- upper pull myo-reps or sets to technical failure
- leg raises, holds, pallof presses

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31181
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +7696
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2010, 06:34:23 pm »
0
how are all the combine vertical numbers inflated?

double arm reach, shoulders pinched back.. they did single last year and verts were way down, this year im not sure what they did, but there's no way tebow has a 7'11 reach at 6'3 or whatever.


Adam.

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
  • Respect: -1
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2010, 10:53:10 am »
0
how are all the combine vertical numbers inflated?

double arm reach, shoulders pinched back.. they did single last year and verts were way down, this year im not sure what they did, but there's no way tebow has a 7'11 reach at 6'3 or whatever.



The 7'11" reach is what they claimed for that vert detective youtube video you raped. That guy was supposedly 6'3"

TKXII

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1255
  • Respect: -12
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2010, 10:11:51 pm »
0
that look's really close, what do you think he hit? He definitely got above the exit sign, after that I can't really see clearly
"Performance during stretch-shortening cycle exercise is influenced by the visco-elastic properties of the muscle-tendon units. During stretching of an activated muscle, mechanical energy is absorbed in the tendon structures (tendon and aponeurosis) and this energy can subsequently be re-utilized if shortening of the muscle immediately follows the stretching. According to Biscotti (2000), 72% of the elastic energy restitution action comes from tendons, 28% - from contractile elements of muscles.

http://www.verkhoshansky.com/Portals/0/Presentations/Shock%20Method%20Plyometrics.pdf

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31181
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +7696
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2010, 12:26:11 am »
0
that look's really close, what do you think he hit? He definitely got above the exit sign, after that I can't really see clearly

im thinking around 12' or so..

his reach is probably like 92", 144" - 92" = 52.. could be a little higher or lower than 12', but its around there.

flyin.

Raptor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14464
  • Respect: +2394
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - raptorescu
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2010, 04:22:20 am »
0
My measurements indicate a 49 inch vert... although you can't see his legs touching the ground on the landing so it's just speculation, but it has to be pretty close. Doesn't look like an all-effort max jump either.

nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #9 on: May 02, 2010, 09:53:58 pm »
0
i've seen this vid a bunch of times , what do you guys think, how high is he getting?

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXKCiaJsn8Q" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXKCiaJsn8Q</a>

adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31181
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +7696
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #10 on: May 02, 2010, 10:21:50 pm »
0
i've seen this vid a bunch of times , what do you guys think, how high is he getting?

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXKCiaJsn8Q" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXKCiaJsn8Q</a>

ya i've commented on that vid a bunch, i think i thought it was 44" or so legit, i forget though.. regardless he is flying.

i can't click it right now to re-watch it, my computer is heavily lagged.. rendering some video.

pc

nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2010, 01:50:45 am »
0
got ya, what's the height of the top of the backboard square.  I know the square is like 18 inches tall, but it starts below the rim. 

looking at it it seems like the top of the bottom portion of the square is rim height and the line thickness is 2 inches.  so i'm thinking it's 11 ft 4 then is that accurate?

is the box gonna be the same dimensions even on hoops at regular gyms, outside hoops, or those hoops with smaller backboards


adarqui

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31181
  • who run it.
  • Respect: +7696
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #12 on: May 03, 2010, 04:27:02 am »
0
got ya, what's the height of the top of the backboard square.  I know the square is like 18 inches tall, but it starts below the rim.  

looking at it it seems like the top of the bottom portion of the square is rim height and the line thickness is 2 inches.  so i'm thinking it's 11 ft 4 then is that accurate?

is the box gonna be the same dimensions even on hoops at regular gyms, outside hoops, or those hoops with smaller backboards



on most of the rims, top of the square is 11'6".. some rims have the square starting well below the rim, but standard hoops it's 11'6:



pc

nba8340

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
  • Respect: +8
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #13 on: May 03, 2010, 05:59:47 am »
0
aight cause i think my boy might get the top of the square at the end of this week, wanted ot know how high it is

Natho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 460
  • Respect: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Are you fucking kidding?
« Reply #14 on: May 03, 2010, 06:09:27 am »
0
i thought the  top was like ~11', ive touched like an inch below it, damn i must of been flying, nba8340 your friend that you train with wats his vert stats again? i saw his head on the backboard vid  :o
Current highest touch = 11'4" (37"-38")
Squat = 140kg x5
             160KgX1
Weight = 97kg
Height = 6'3"
Reach = 8'2"-8'3"