Adarq.org

I hope he does great for the contest he will take part in soon, so he can make a name for himself even more and get all the credit and respect he deserve. this guy is the truth man.

same man.. love your comments on his utube too.

when is the contest? saturday right? or sunday?

Me = me.

Since I got this hernia thingy. But at his 120x3 on the squat he has a long way to go. He has great upperbody strength since he worked pretty much all on that... I think he has a bench press of 110x5 at ~85 kg bodyweight.

oh i misread.. my bad

you got an actual hernia? diagnosed? not self diagnosed?
:/

man sometimes i get so bored at the courts.. i played a game of 21, then i bring out cam and im like hey yall wanna get this on film? and those pussies wimped out.. "nah man dont put me on film", probably coz i was destroying them and they knew i was about to actually start playing.. so weak lmfao

anyway, so bored that i did some single leg jumps.. weird cam angles koz i was told not to film:

i guess i was so bored because i wanted to go outdoor today.. then i had to go to this shitty 24hour fitness.. stupid hurricane ruining my dunking.


this dunk came RIGHT AFTER guy told me not to film, dropped it down nasty..

gym finally got new power racks. first time squatting in over a year. Previous PR was 265 lbs once, hit 300 pounds today easy!!!!! almost 2x body weight full squat, weighed in at 155 today. legs feel crazy strong right now and its showing in my vertical.  looking forward to getting back into squatting, hope to get up in the high 300s.

damn..............

cant imagine not squatting for a year, coming back, and then pr'n wtf.

bleh it's raining, sucks, off to 24hour fitness :<

Interesting.  Do you have data on the SVJ/RVJ and strength numbers of the athletes before the test?  My point of view has always been:

1) Athlete is weak and slow:  Plyometrics are of little use
2) Athlete is moderately strong: Plyometrics are useful but weighted plyometrics are not.
3) Athlete is strong reactive and does not carry extra bodyfat:  Plyometrics and weighted plyometrics are useful.


Obviously the scale is continuous.  But the point is basically the more advanced the trainee is the more helpful weighted plyos are.  I think of weighted plyos sort of like depth jumps from a large height.  For advanced athletes they are great.  For beginners they are simply a fast track to injury.    

ya, that's why on here you'll catch alot of us talking about "low level reactive work", stuff like repetitive tuck jumps, pogos, line hop drills, etc.. i like those for beginners or any experience level, as long as they do not carry a high body fat % and are healthy, it's good to get in some rebounding training even if you're weak, but the intensity of the rebound training has to be low if you're weak... people who are really weak trying to perform depth jumps, bounds, etc, are asking for problems.. however, i consider low box dj's as safe for beginners, like 12" boxes etc.. any level of athlete will benefit from light rebound training, it still reinforces improvements in rfd/SEC efficiency.

pC

fucking lmfao..............

Quote from: $ick3nin.v3nd3tta on August 25, 2011, 12:45:49 am

I have also discovered a link between wide nostrils & speed which I don't think nobody else has discovered.

bwahahahaha, how can people not appreciate this!  sickninvendetta >

x2, i giggled like a little girl when i read that.