Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - adarqui

Pages: 1 ... 1456 1457 [1458] 1459 1460 ... 1505
21856
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: February 20, 2010, 05:52:53 am »
2/20/2010

lots of pushups on my pushup-handles

calfs are still so sore from that road-work

pullups tomorrow, and possibly stepups if i can walk.

pc



working on some SL RVJ article.. been doing it for a week or so now.. formatting it is hell.


Damn 50 degrees is freezing,
what happened to your equipment? 

nothing i still got it.. it's good i was over reacting.

21857
Pics, Videos, & Links / kid with nice vert
« on: February 20, 2010, 03:14:10 am »
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTcHWvXjkJA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTcHWvXjkJA</a>

-- courtesy Arowe

21858
Quote
The final plant area was totaly dry and clear. But the runup was on wet so shoes were wet too :-\
So i was feeling afraid to push my legs 100% on runup but it was pure 100% efforts at takeoff.

ah, ya i still wouldnt be able to do that though.. when im dunking i dry my shoes with my hands so much, it's like OCD.

Quote
Still it went great, I could even claim RVJ PRs :
Some jumps i considered 31'' were touching the rim 6'' below my highest finger point , but my hand was not vertical , it had some angle. But wasnt filming so cant claim it. No hurrys , it can wait a couple of weeks...

sick, sounds like it was a very good session.

21859
Bios / Re: THE ADARQUI BIO
« on: February 19, 2010, 03:21:31 pm »
reserved for boxing `ish.


One round shadowboxing, one of 9




Some heavy bag work: rounds 1,2,3



21860

19 February 2010

Vertical jump testing

Weight at session : ~190,5lbs
Jumping on concrete, 10' rim.

Warmup : Dynamic warmup 5' + few medium effort jumps

2x5 Standing Vertical Jumps : Average = max = 26,5''
2x5 Running Vertical Jumps :  Average 31'' , maximum ~31,5''

SVJ = ~2'' below PR , RVJ = 0,5'' below PR
Pretty happy with this session for the following reasons:

1) Havent done rim jumps from 6 January!
2) Court was wet and a bit muddy , the only clear spot was the final landing point so i couldnt push my runup steps.
3) RVJs felt good , and 31'' was easier than ever, 30'' was almost efortless.
4) SVJ - RVJ gap = 5''

Now off for 1 week skiing in the alps , hope my quads wont become a 537% slow-twich! :D





nice man have a good time.

when you come back, keep implementing these things you've been doing and set some new PR's.

man i could never jump on a slippery court, that's rugged.

21861
Bios / Re: THE ADARQUI BIO
« on: February 19, 2010, 06:27:02 am »
Youtube playlists:


2011 stuff:



















2010 stuff:













2009 stuff:




INCEPTION DUNK MIX




ULTRA VIOLENCE DUNK MIX : VOLUME 1

EDDIE & I DUNKING

SOME DUNKS : PART 2

Some nice one's in there: ~38" RVJ


SOME DUNKS



~37-38" RVJ & a hard dunk


PURE-DEDICATION INTRO MIX



36-38" RUNNING VERT on various dunks

225 lb. barbell lunges

285 lb. explosive above-parallel squat

~40+" deep depth drop

infamous Bernard "The Executioner" Hopkins quotes

Two Dunks

 

21862
Bios / THE ADARQUI BIO
« on: February 19, 2010, 06:17:03 am »
FYI: I had to delete alot of my good dunk videos because of the music, so to not get DMCA'd on youtube, so that's why some links might not work.


































































extended bio, based on a question:

http://www.adarq.org/forum/index.php?topic=482.0

21863
News, Announcements, & Suggestions / *** NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION ***
« on: February 19, 2010, 05:26:30 am »

Signup for the forum:

You will receive occasional newsletter updates about the site, forum, blog, and other news.


Register here:



PS:
  • Your email won't be used for spam or anything like that.
  • There will be no "F.REE" gift offers.
  • Squatflex will not be promoted.


21864
being sick sucks...  >:(

ya it does.. :/

get better.

21865
im confused, korfist didn't know who he was talking too? wtf?

i thought he was talking to nuttall etc..

my main problem with korfist, in regards to his opinion on squat, is how he just generalizes it too much.. he acts as if people who squat, have to be squatting deep with considerable volume.

i'm a low volume, high intensity, don't go deeper than perfect form / natural leverages allows, and keep feet neutral..

a question to him could be, "well how would you implement squat correctly, if you had to implement it"..

21866
Performance Training Blog / Re: 06/17/2010: The Ratio Technique
« on: February 19, 2010, 01:04:08 am »
bump, who here can't see the flash animated banner on the top?


21867
Performance Training Blog / The Ratio Technique
« on: February 18, 2010, 05:59:50 pm »

                       SWFObject 2 static publishing example page                                                                
               
                                                                                                                                                                             
                                         

Alternative content

                                       

Get Adobe Flash player

                               
                                                               
                                                       
               
       


02/17/2010: The Ratio Technique

by: adarqui


Once athletes discover periodization, they very often over think the process. You often find programs layed out in full detail, from the exact exercises & sets & reps, to the exact days when training will occur. In most cases, there are a few problems with this approach:

  • Strict schedules do not allow for autoregulation
  • Strict protocols do not promote adjustment
  • Strict schedules might interfere with skill work
  • Strict schedules usually break up training into a 7-day period (training rhythm)


This small blog entry will cover the training rhythm.


Training Rhythm

One of the most important aspects of performance training, is finding a "rhythm" with your training. Finding a rhythm implies knowing how & when you will experience performance drop off's (dips), supercompensations (rises), or potentiation (stim) from training.

  • DIPS: This is when performance decreases, temporarily, due to fatigue of the central nervous system (CNS) or the muscles themself.
  • RISES: This is when performance increases, temporarily, due to a over compensation of the CNS or muscles to the previously experienced fatigue.
  • STIM: This is when performance increases, temporarily, due to a carry over effect from special exercises (heavy squat singles or low volume depth jumps for example). What makes STIM different than supercompensation, is that STIM can occur in the absence of a dip (fatigue) in performance.

Most athletes stick to a routine which fits precisely within a 7 day period. To me, this is most often a mistake, though in some circumstances it might be completely necessary. The problem with a 7 day period, is that it is a "forced" rhythm. Sessions may be performed in the face of too much fatigue, not enough stim, too little frequency, or too much frequency.

One thing is for sure, the body has a natural 24 hour rhythm, set to the rise & fall of the sun. This has evolved from organism to organism for millions of years.



The Ratio Technique

A very effective way to split up training is by using ratios, using a general guideline instead of using specific days of the week.

YOUR BRAIN ON RATIO



Ratio "SYNTAX"
  • session-type-1:session-type-2:session-type-n = X:Y:Z
  • Perform session-type-1 X times in a row, followed by session-type-2 Y times in a row, followed by session-type-N Z times in a row


FULL Example ratio: Peaking power: strength-hypertrophy:strength-power:stim
  • Phase 1: Strength-hypertrophy emphasis: 3:1:1
  • Session 1: strength-hypertrophy
  • Session 2: stremgth-hypertrophy
  • Session 3: strength-hypertrophy
  • Session 4: strength-power
  • Session 5: stim (MSEM)
  • Phase 2: Strength-hypertrophy transition: 2:1:1
  • Session 1: strength-hypertrophy
  • Session 2: strength-hypertrophy
  • Session 3: strength-power
  • Session 4: stim (MSEM)
  • Phase 3: Neutral 1:1:1
  • Session 1: strength-hypertrophy
  • Session 2: strength-power
  • Session 3: stim (MSEM)
  • Phase 4: Peak 0:1:1
  • Session 1: strength-power
  • Session 2: stim (MSEM)
  • Phase 5: In-season 0:0:1
  • Session 1: stim (MSEM)
So for the above example, we could have:

  • Phase 1: Off-season, Rotations = 3
  • Phase 2: Off-season, Rotations = 2
  • Phase 3: Off-season, Rotations = 2
  • Phase 4: Pre-season, Rotations = 3
  • Phase 5: In-season, Rotations = whatever

Since we perform STIM as the last session, Phases 1-4 could have some kind of official testing when you rotate back to session 1. This way you continually monitor your performance, through each phase of the program.

Notice that I just list it as: Session 1, Session 2, Session n. This means, that you don't need to conform to a weekly schedule, instead, you can add or reduce rest days based on how you are adapting to the program. For example, there might be 3 rest days following a strength-hypertrophy session, two rest days following a strength-power session, and one rest day following a stim session. However, that does not mean we must conform exactly, instead, adding or removing rest days may change throughout the program, allowing you to train at optimal levels throughout.

So, if you prefer to plan out your rotations, the above example could be written as:

FULL Example ratio: Peaking power: strength-hypertrophy:strength-power:stim
  • Phase 1: Strength-hypertrophy emphasis: [3:1:1] x 3
  • Phase 2: Strength-hypertrophy transition: [2:1:1] x 2
  • Phase 3: Neutral [1:1:1] x 2
  • Phase 4: Peak [0:1:1] x 3
  • Phase 5: In-season 0:0:1


More quick examples:


Example ratio: Peaking Strength: hypertrophy:strength:stim
  • Phase 1: Hypertrophy emphasis: 3:1:1
  • Phase 2: Hypertrophy transition 2:1:1
  • Phase 3: Neutral 1:1:1
  • Phase 4: Strength transition 1:2:1
  • Phase 5: Strength emphasis 1:3:1


Example ratio: Peaking Power: strength:power
  • Phase 1: Strength emphasis: 3:1
  • Phase 2: Strength transition: 2:1
  • phase 3: Neutral: 1:1
  • Phase 4: Power transition: 1:2
  • Phase 5: Power emphasis: 1:3

In the above two examples, you could then "stack" both blocks together:

  • Block 1: Peaking Strength
  • Block 2: Peaking Power



Example ratio: Conditioning emphasis: strength-power:conditioning
  • Phase 1: Neutral 1:1
  • Phase 2: Conditioning emphasis 1:2
  • Phase 3: Conditioning intensification 1:3


In my own training, I really didn't spend much time on hypertrophy, instead I spent time on strength blocks, mixed strength/power blocks, and finally high frequency training. My ratio's might look like:

  • Phase 1: Strength emphasis = strength:power+stim(plyos+MSEM) -> 3:1
  • Phase 2: Strength transition = strength:power+stim(plyos+MSEM) -> 2:1
  • Phase 3: Neutral = strength:power+stim(plyos+MSEM) -> 1:1
  • Phase 4: High frequency stim =  lower-volume plyos+MSEM:higher-volume plyos+MSEM -> 1:3



So there you have it, my preferred way of structuring programs and the blocks within them.

A few key points
  • Pick qualities based on their interaction with each other, such as:
  • Hypertrophy preceding strength
  • Strength preceding power
  • Power preceding intensification of skill work (skill work in this sense refers to in-season or sport competition)
  • Maintaining strength/power while intensifying conditioning
  • Maintaining strength/power while intensifying skill work
  • Build up quality A, without neglecting quality B
  • Transition from quality A to quality B
  • Build up quality B, without neglecting quality A
  • Possibly use stim throughout to properly assess current performance


pC

-- adarqui

21868
Hey guys I added an interview with Chris Korfist. In it we discuss a bit about foot function and some inno-sport stuff. Check it out at:

http://evolutionaryathletics.com

nice, gonna check it out in a sec.

big fan of korfist.

21869
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: no bounce, need bounce
« on: February 18, 2010, 01:39:42 pm »
I turned my motherfucking ankle on the motherfucking pack ice. On the way to the gym. It's not that bad but enough that it tweaks when I walk and now I'm doing hot/cold and I got an ace bandage, too.

Workout today (such as it was):

foam roll legs (thoroughly)
spin on bike x10mins
stretch a bunch

Was too pissed to do core or anything.

wtf how did that happen??????????

god damn.. ive done dumb shit like that, that's the worst.

i completely dislocated my little toe once doing some training barefoot, thing went sideways.


21870
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: ADARQ's journal
« on: February 17, 2010, 01:49:28 am »
2/16/2010

_49.5 (F) degrees in florida_

i didn't even know... i went training in a t-shirt, shorts, and high socks.. that's freezing for florida.. i get home and my body has red bloches all over it.. hah


shadow boxing:
- 6 rounds
- not that great
- my sleep was real messed up today :/ that's what did it

jogging:
- ~4 miles or so
- i ran to songs, for example, 4 min song = 4 minute run, fast pace.. then rest 1 min
- trying to model boxing work/rest ratio a bit when it comes to jogging

oh ya im jogging cause i dont have my power rack/ssbar right now.. dno when ill use it again.. so i have absolutely no gym equipment, so it's:
- shadow boxing
- pushups
- find a bar for pullups
- core
- tons of jogging/sprinting


ok peace

Pages: 1 ... 1456 1457 [1458] 1459 1460 ... 1505