interesting article on caleb wilson's training (he just won western states). https://evokeendurance.com/resources/caleb-olsons-build-to-a-course-record-at-transgrancanaria/
the bit i found most interesting is the physiology in the weighted uphills section. i'm sceptical (but not quite doubtful) of the claims in there. like what is muscular endurance/fatigue resistance as opposed to like improving LT1/LT2/general aerobic adaptation
1? is that really capturing the difference in the stimulus from those sorts of routines vs an unburdened _run_ up a hill vs a threshold session? i get that the cadence is going to be a lot lower, so it's maybe like 40% as many contractions to achieve the same power output. curious in how that cashes out in terms of lactate, respiration, or whatever other metrics we might care about.
did i ever show you the Nils Svensson (formerly Nils van der Poel) 'how to skate a 10k' memoir? now that's a good piece on how someone trained for an insane athletic performance (double WR/OR/gold in skating 5k/10k, which are basically equivalent to running 2.5k/5k):
https://www.howtoskate.se/Highlight:
1 reminds me of the classic Greg Nuckols view where "strength endurance" is sort of not a real thing. You can train with sets of 20 and get better at doing more reps with 70% of 1rm without your 1rm changing much, or you can just do low rep training, increase your 1rm and end up being able to do as many reps with 56% of your new 1rm, i.e. same "endurance performance at a given weight" as if you'd done the other program:
https://archive.ph/3UtUp