1
Progress Journals & Experimental Routines / Re: warpspeed to the new scenario
« Last post by Joe on July 10, 2025, 04:04:58 pm »10-07-25
Gym--
Stairmaster x 25 mins
Incline walk x 20 mins
Machine Dip x 3 drop
D-Handle Cable Row x 3 drop
OL Seated Calf 40 x 4, 3 + a bunch two legged
Notes
Also jogged to and from the gym (like ~.5k each way) without pain. Hell yeah. Gonna still avoid running a few more days since I'm enjoying this routine, then will slowly reintegrate. Cycling I kind of hate but incline walking and stairmaster I'm into, so could see those sticking around even when I'm fully in the swing of things. No ego attached to them at all so it's easy to just pick an HR and lock in. Lower impact too so don't mind doing it more zone 2 rather than zone 1 without feeling like I'm gonna get beat up as compared to running.
mhmm yeah, maybe. I mean in this case my point is that the PT wouldn't be wrong to say "it's probably this, run less, strengthen your foot and ankle"! but like I can work that out myself and I have no problems sticking to a routine on that basis. So for me, I think the highest value is (a) for stuff that you can't make sense of yourself, (b) when you're someone who's not rly in the know so much or (c) you need some accountability to stick to a rehab routine. That said, I'd defo go much more quickly for anything like lower back or shoulder related. But lower leg + tendon stuff feels in my wheelhouse.
I'm also pretty sceptical of manual therapy beyond acute relief
Gym--
Stairmaster x 25 mins
Incline walk x 20 mins
Machine Dip x 3 drop
D-Handle Cable Row x 3 drop
OL Seated Calf 40 x 4, 3 + a bunch two legged
Notes
Also jogged to and from the gym (like ~.5k each way) without pain. Hell yeah. Gonna still avoid running a few more days since I'm enjoying this routine, then will slowly reintegrate. Cycling I kind of hate but incline walking and stairmaster I'm into, so could see those sticking around even when I'm fully in the swing of things. No ego attached to them at all so it's easy to just pick an HR and lock in. Lower impact too so don't mind doing it more zone 2 rather than zone 1 without feeling like I'm gonna get beat up as compared to running.
go to PT?
maybe if i'm not seeing any improvement after another week of activity modification. i have never had particularly productive experiences with PTs, despite having seen 4 or 5 highly recommended people in my time training. like what are they gonna say "it's probably this, run less, strengthen your foot and ankle" cool thanks i worked that out already.
i guess if you've only had bad experiences, makes sense you wouldn't want to try again. i've definitely had that kind of PT, but i've had some good ones, too. helping identify root causes i wouldn't have thought of, for example. dry needling or other kinds of manual therapy. there must be some good PTs over there.
mhmm yeah, maybe. I mean in this case my point is that the PT wouldn't be wrong to say "it's probably this, run less, strengthen your foot and ankle"! but like I can work that out myself and I have no problems sticking to a routine on that basis. So for me, I think the highest value is (a) for stuff that you can't make sense of yourself, (b) when you're someone who's not rly in the know so much or (c) you need some accountability to stick to a rehab routine. That said, I'd defo go much more quickly for anything like lower back or shoulder related. But lower leg + tendon stuff feels in my wheelhouse.
I'm also pretty sceptical of manual therapy beyond acute relief