8461
Strength, Power, Reactivity, & Speed Discussion / Re: why the us sucks at olympic lifting
« on: September 16, 2011, 09:09:51 am »It's not really necessary to compare the numbers of the NBA and NFL players. NBA players play 82 game long seasons (well prob not this year) on 12 man teams where injury prevention is much more important than standing vertical jump. The point is not that NFL or NBA players are great athletes in so far as their vertical jump or sprint speed but that the NFL and NBA take attract a large percentage of talented youth who could otherwise go on to find success in athletics or weightlifting. This is indisputable. Reggie Bush was a mid 10 100m runner, Nate Robinson was a talented 110 hurdler, Javhid Best ran mid 20.x in the 200m, all in high school. I ran against some of these guys. The showed promise, but I guarantee none of them could outperform their high school PR's today. That's because the NFL and the NBA don't make you better at running 100m or 200m or hurdling. They are great athletes because they displayed impressive times at a young age and with limited training. It's impossible to say which of them would have gone on to world-class performance because you really never know... In athletics some people peak at 18 some people at 36.
However, it's not a reach by any stretch to say that a great many athletes who are either in the NFL or NBA (or attempting to make pro-careers out of basketball or american football) could have gone on to great careers in athletics. The US has an incredible amount of ethnic diversity, areas with great weather, lots of money for sports, and well over 300 million people. If the US had the type of cultural focus on athletics that Caribbean countries have you wouldn't see a country with 2.8 million people (Jamaica) out-representing the US in the 100m and matching in the 200m.
all true. still doesn't answer the question of why we suck at olympic lifting, although the lack of cultural emphasis is certainly part of it.
